Peptides are cope

[Peco]

The only reason peptides aren't viewed as much of a cope as things like skincare is that people are scared of injecting them. Almost all the people that talk about peptides have never taken them and never will yet they talk about them increasing the hype around them. If a large amount of people started using peptides everybody would soon realize they don't have the magical effects that people advocate for and they would be seen as extreme copes.

All the studies that people show to prove that these things work exist for every skincare ingredient as well. Yet people on here fall for the logical fallacy of believing that if something is more dangerous/harder to consume then it must work better and not be a scam. I guarantee you that if peptides were easier to consume and more accessible they would be clowned on by everybody on this forum.

This is a recurring pattern with all the methods that are considered most effective on this forum. The logical fallacy of believing that more negative side effects = better positive results is very common and is also the reason why a lot of natural methods that actually work are considered by most people as copes, because they have nothing dangerous attached to them.

 

[sunnypenguin141]

100%, even if peptides were indeed effective the weight of the negative side effects makes it absolutely not worth it.
Recently the peptide industry has invested countless of money on the marketing of their products to get them featured on multiple forms of social media to target young and naive people.

Stay natural.

 

[sherry12]

The only reason peptides aren't viewed as much of a cope as things like skincare is that people are scared of injecting them. Almost all the people that talk about peptides have never taken them and never will yet they talk about them increasing the hype around them. If a large amount of people started using peptides everybody would soon realize they don't have the magical effects that people advocate for and they would be seen as extreme copes.

All the studies that people show to prove that these things work exist for every skincare ingredient as well. Yet people on here fall for the logical fallacy of believing that if something is more dangerous/harder to consume then it must work better and not be a scam. I guarantee you that if peptides were easier to consume and more accessible they would be clowned on by everybody on this forum.

This is a recurring pattern with all the methods that are considered most effective on this forum. The logical fallacy of believing that more negative side effects = better positive results is very common and is also the reason why a lot of natural methods that actually work are considered by most people as copes, because they have nothing dangerous attached to them.

did not read a fucking molecule just kys

 

[Peco]

100%, even if peptides were indeed effective the weight of the negative side effects makes it absolutely not worth it.
Recently the peptide industry has invested countless of money on the marketing of their products to get them featured on multiple forms of social media to target young and naive people.

Stay natural.

Exactly, it's not a coincidence that the rise in popularity of peptides is linear to that of looksmaxxing. Companies realized they can profit on people's insecurities and started pushing them on the market by leveraging the logical fallacy I explained above.

 

[mxsada]

The only reason peptides aren't viewed as much of a cope as things like skincare is that people are scared of injecting them. Almost all the people that talk about peptides have never taken them and never will yet they talk about them increasing the hype around them. If a large amount of people started using peptides everybody would soon realize they don't have the magical effects that people advocate for and they would be seen as extreme copes.

All the studies that people show to prove that these things work exist for every skincare ingredient as well. Yet people on here fall for the logical fallacy of believing that if something is more dangerous/harder to consume then it must work better and not be a scam. I guarantee you that if peptides were easier to consume and more accessible they would be clowned on by everybody on this forum.

This is a recurring pattern with all the methods that are considered most effective on this forum. The logical fallacy of believing that more negative side effects = better positive results is very common and is also the reason why a lot of natural methods that actually work are considered by most people as copes, because they have nothing dangerous attached to them.

in fact, most of peptides are useless, pharmaceuticals are law

 

[mxsada]

Exactly, it's not a coincidence that the rise in popularity of peptides is linear to that of looksmaxxing. Companies realized they can profit on people's insecurities and started pushing them on the market by leveraging the logical fallacy I explained above.

bro are you even a real human are you that stupid?

 

[Peco]

bro are you even a real human are you that stupid?

What's wrong with what I said ?

 

[imnotagreyceliswear]

The only reason peptides aren't viewed as much of a cope as things like skincare is that people are scared of injecting them. Almost all the people that talk about peptides have never taken them and never will yet they talk about them increasing the hype around them. If a large amount of people started using peptides everybody would soon realize they don't have the magical effects that people advocate for and they would be seen as extreme copes.

All the studies that people show to prove that these things work exist for every skincare ingredient as well. Yet people on here fall for the logical fallacy of believing that if something is more dangerous/harder to consume then it must work better and not be a scam. I guarantee you that if peptides were easier to consume and more accessible they would be clowned on by everybody on this forum.

This is a recurring pattern with all the methods that are considered most effective on this forum. The logical fallacy of believing that more negative side effects = better positive results is very common and is also the reason why a lot of natural methods that actually work are considered by most people as copes, because they have nothing dangerous attached to them.

DNR NIGGER

 

[KellSS]

 

[Peco]

DNR NIGGER

Feb 1,2026

 

[MakinItHappen]

Cope for health, no.

Cope for facial aesthetics, KINDA.

If your problem is shit like insulin resistance, then denying it can help with weight loss and thus facial aesthetics, is intellectually retarded. Coz it can.

It can help with weight, skin-care and facial masculinisation.... relative to what you take....... but it cannot create dashing features or bone structure/density that isn't there to begin with.

You need a foundation to work from. Like Clavicular. Like every 5.5-6.5/10

 

[LiverLover12]

I agree with you 100%. Simply because people subconsciously consider steroids and peptides to be something illegal and dangerous, it automatically becomes something that works. And most likely their bones don't grow; it's just a placebo effect.
P.S. For the niggas who don't believe him there is a thread: https://looksmax.org/threads/why-hgh-is-cope-and-will-not-work-for-you-hgh-users-gtfih.1887337/

 

[Peco]

Cope for health, no.

Cope for facial aesthetics, KINDA.

If your problem is shit like insulin resistance, then denying it can help with weight loss and thus facial aesthetics, is intellectually retarded. Coz it can.

It can help with weight, skin-care and facial masculinisation.... relative to what you take....... but it cannot create dashing features or bone structure/density that isn't there to begin with.

You need a foundation to work from. Like Clavicular. Like every 5.5-6.5/10

What I mean is that like skincare or other things regarded as copes it can help, it doesn't mean it's completly useless but it will not yield the results most people expect