Perfect big juicy pregnant boobs

[HarrierDuBois]

Highly doubt that but aight

Come here and you'll see.

 

[DelonLover1999]

How am I not? Provide examples.

You can't disagree about objectivity, which is why I say people are coping. I am knowledgeable but people don't wanna hear it.

You’re not free from it = it could happen to you too, at any moment, and you wouldn’t notice (at least not immediately)

You absolutely can disagree about objectivity. It happens all the time, even in much more rigorous fields, like physics

Being easy to place phenotypically isn’t a prereq for attractiveness, some gl actors and models often have 5-page classification threads on apricity

 

[Acne Victim]

The Devil spoke through this post. Racemixing and even phenotypical mixing breaks the charm of high pedigree phenotypes.

Chico is not pure either

 

[HarrierDuBois]

You’re not free from it = it could happen to you too, at any moment, and you wouldn’t notice (at least not immediately)

Thanks for the examples provided.

You absolutely can disagree about objectivity. It happens all the time, even in much more rigorous fields, like physics

Disagreements surrounding "objectivity" where the basis is lack of knowledge is not really a legitimate example.

Being easy to place phenotypically isn’t a prereq for attractiveness, some gl actors and models often have 5-page classification threads on apricity

It's not a prereq, but unless you reach a looks level at which your unique composition will halo you it will hinder you. Also it's much less charming to be ambiguous rather than clear cut.

 

[HarrierDuBois]

Chico is not pure either

So? His phenotype is not charming, he is carried by ideal craniofacial development, ratios, and insane features.

 

[Acne Victim]

So? His phenotype is not charming, he is carried by ideal craniofacial development, ratios, and insane features.

How is his phenotype not charming tho.

 

[DelonLover1999]

Also it's much less charming to be ambiguous rather than clear cut.

Why?

Disagreements surrounding "objectivity" where the basis is lack of knowledge is not really a legitimate example.

Lack of knowledge? The best in the world disagree over objective things every single day of the year lol

Thanks for the examples provided.

It’s a cognitive bias. If you’re human, you’re not free from it.

 

[HarrierDuBois]

How is his phenotype not charming tho.

Plain coloring and boring. If not for his one of a kind triangular eye area his face would be averagely perfect and incredibly boring, basically an upgraded lighter Tobias Sorensen.

Why?

Which car looks better, the harmoniously balanced one or the one with influences from everywhere?

Lack of knowledge? The best in the world disagree over objective things every single day of the year lol

You can't disagree about something objective and if you can it wasn't objective to begin with.

It’s a cognitive bias. If you’re human, you’re not free from it.

I don't rate with biases.

 

[DelonLover1999]

Plain coloring and boring. If not for his one of a kind triangular eye area his face would be averagely perfect and incredibly boring, basically an upgraded lighter Tobias Sorensen.

Which car looks better, the harmoniously balanced one or the one with influences from everywhere?

You can't disagree about something objective and if you can it wasn't objective to begin with.

I don't rate with biases.

Everyone rates with bias, you’re not special.

Looks theory isn’t math, you’re not proving theorems and putting QED at the bottom of the page. And even if it was…

All you have is a connection to evolutionary biology and statistical analysis, two highly ‘imperfect’ subjects

Also that car analogy is disingenuous asf and you know it lmao

 

[HarrierDuBois]

Everyone rates with bias, you’re not special.

Looks theory isn’t math, you’re not proving theorems and putting QED at the bottom of the page. And even if it was…

All you have is a connection to evolutionary biology and statistical analysis, two highly ‘imperfect’ subjects

Also that car analogy is disingenuous asf and you know it lmao

Looks are math. Hence why you can calcuate ratios and correspond it to improving.

The car analogy is not disingenuous, something consisting of the same parts looks way better than when you start putting other parts there.

 

[Acne Victim]

Plain coloring and boring. If not for his one of a kind triangular eye area his face would be averagely perfect and incredibly boring, basically an upgraded lighter Tobias Sorensen.

Hmm yeah fair

 

[DelonLover1999]

Looks are math. Hence why you can calcuate ratios and correspond it to improving.

The car analogy is not disingenuous, something consisting of the same parts looks way better than when you start putting other parts there.

Ratios are math, but the human brain does not perceive them in a single, unified way, or else everyone would pretty much agree. Even among the most knowledgeable ppl in the world, there will be preferences

Music can also be boiled down to just math and numbers, in fact anything that exists in the physical world can, does that mean it’s now objective?

Ambiguity can be incredibly charming. Think of genre-bending movies.

 

[Acne Victim]

Plain coloring and boring. If not for his one of a kind triangular eye area his face would be averagely perfect and incredibly boring, basically an upgraded lighter Tobias Sorensen.

btw bro do u know if this dalit is mixed with something? his colouring and some ratios are really similar to mine even though he is a dane. i can use him as inspiration for a lot of surgeries to be frank

 

[HarrierDuBois]

Ratios are math, but the human brain does not perceive them in a single, unified way, or else everyone would pretty much agree. Even among the most knowledgeable ppl in the world, there will be preferences

No one perceives a fox as a knight, at a certain level some things are too powerful.

Music can also be boiled down to just math and numbers, in fact anything that exists in the physical world can, does that mean it’s now objective?

I guess not.

Ambiguity can be incredibly charming. Think of genre-bending movies.

Not the same thing at all. Genre is a human made concept meanwhile inherited phenotypical features signaling ancestry is not.

btw bro do u know if this dalit is mixed with something? his colouring and some ratios are really similar to mine even though he is a dane. i can use him as inspiration for a lot of surgeries to be frank

He is appearently only danish but I agree he looks quite non danish, med specifically.

 

[DelonLover1999]

No one perceives a fox as a knight, at a certain level some things are too powerful.

I guess not.

Not the same thing at all. Genre is a human made concept meanwhile inherited phenotypical features signaling ancestry is not.

That fox v knight shit is fun and all but there’s a lot more to physical perception than just two categories. There also exist ppl who act nothing like they look like, although that’s very very rare

I truly believe that ‘charm’ being linked to phenotypical purity is just an opinion you hold. Unless you wanna show me something that supports it.

 

[Gengar]

OP is Indian confirmed.

 

[HarrierDuBois]

That fox v knight shit is fun and all but there’s a lot more to physical perception than just two categories.

One of many behavioural axes.

There also exist ppl who act nothing like they look like, although that’s very very rare

I look quite foxy but am a kind guy.

I truly believe that ‘charm’ being linked to phenotypical purity is just an opinion you hold. Unless you wanna show me something that supports it.

You're stuck on the word charm, didn't mean charismatic I meant it has an intriguing advantage to be high pedigree, looks preserved.

 

[Researcher of Incel]

View attachment 2506383

Boobs are overrated