PERFECT HEIGHT RATING SCALE

tyowuwe

tyowuwe

Bronze
Joined
Nov 14, 2025
Posts
340
Reputation
290
Dress Up National Basketball Association GIF by NBA

- This was made taking into account female dating app statical preferences where 5'11+ typically becomes the idealistic tipping point of mass appeal
- Also this is rooted in female preference on average (Ideally is 6-7 inches taller than their partner)
- This also mirrors the skewed ratings of the OK Cupid study done on women rating men

Manlet
2/10: 5'0'-5'1
2.5/10: 5'1-5'3
3/10: 5'3-5'5
3.5/10: 5'5-5'7

Heightcel

4/10: 5'7-5'9
4.5/10: 5'9-5'10

Bare Minimum
5/10: 5'10-5'11
5.5/10: 5'11-6'0

Tallish
6/10: 6'0-6'1
6.5/10: 6'1-6'1.5


Tall
7/10: 6'1.5-6'2
7.5/10: 6'2-6'3


Titan
8/10: 6'3-6'3.5
8.5/10: 6'3.5-6'4

Terra-Titan

9/10: 6'4-6'4.5
9.5/10: 6'4.5-6'5

Perfection

10/10: 6'5

"Why stop at 6'5. More Height is better boyo"

Height shows diminishing returns/negative yields at 6'6+. Maintaining an appealing physique at that height becomes near impossible too, hence why we see women capping their maximum height preference at around 6'4-6'5.

"5'9 is average why is it Heightcel range"
This is based on female preference not on actual averages. For example, studies show women rate the average man as below average attractiveness. But that makes no sense right? No shit it doesn't, they're hypergamous and unintelligent and have overinflated egos. You're skewed down lower than you actual statical place globally because women will always think the average man is richer, taller, hotter, and smarter than what they actually are.
 
  • +1
Reactions: bluebandz, Nerogen, realboyo and 4 others
rating these heights in the perspective of a hypergamous fat foid
 
  • +1
Reactions: tyowuwe
id rather be 7’0 tall than 6’5. Height doesnt have any diminishing returns until maybe over 7’5
 
id rather be 7’0 tall than 6’5. Height doesnt have any diminishing returns until maybe over 7’5
Nah man. Most studies show pretty significant drop offs in appeal past 6’6. But 7’0 would still be better than 5’9.
 
Dress Up National Basketball Association GIF by NBA

- This was made taking into account female dating app statical preferences where 5'11+ typically becomes the idealistic tipping point of mass appeal
- Also this is rooted in female preference on average (Ideally is 6-7 inches taller than their partner)
- This also mirrors the skewed ratings of the OK Cupid study done on women rating men

Manlet
2/10: 5'0'-5'1
2.5/10: 5'1-5'3
3/10: 5'3-5'5
3.5/10: 5'5-5'7

Heightcel

4/10: 5'7-5'9
4.5/10: 5'9-5'10

Bare Minimum
5/10: 5'10-5'11
5.5/10: 5'11-6'0

Tallish
6/10: 6'0-6'1
6.5/10: 6'1-6'1.5


Tall
7/10: 6'1.5-6'2
7.5/10: 6'2-6'3


Titan
8/10: 6'3-6'3.5
8.5/10: 6'3.5-6'4

Terra-Titan

9/10: 6'4-6'4.5
9.5/10: 6'4.5-6'5

Perfection

10/10: 6'5

"Why stop at 6'5. More Height is better boyo"

Height shows diminishing returns/negative yields at 6'6+. Maintaining an appealing physique at that height becomes near impossible too, hence why we see women capping their maximum height preference at around 6'4-6'5.

"5'9 is average why is it Heightcel range"
This is based on female preference not on actual averages. For example, studies show women rate the average man as below average attractiveness. But that makes no sense right? No shit it doesn't, they're hypergamous and unintelligent and have overinflated egos. You're skewed down lower than you actual statical place globally because women will always think the average man is richer, taller, hotter, and smarter than what they actually are.
People will call this BS but this is in the eyes of the most fat disgusting foid you know
 
  • +1
Reactions: tyowuwe
id rather be 7’0 tall than 6’5. Height doesnt have any diminishing returns until maybe over 7’5
how you gonna board a plane at 7 foot

you wont be able to travel the world:( unless by boat
 
Nah man. Most studies show pretty significant drop offs in appeal past 6’6. But 7’0 would still be better than 5’9.
Because the avg girl is 5’4 lol… just get with a really tall girl if this is a problem

if you have broad shoulders 7’0 tall is like way more attractive than 6’5
 
Because the avg girl is 5’4 lol… just get with a really tall girl if this is a problem

if you have broad shoulders 7’0 tall is like way more attractive than 6’5
Yes. My list is about broad appeal (ie what the perfect height to a woman is for the majority). “Really Tall girls” are rare and hence the selection of a 7’0 man as ideal is just as rare. 1SD above average female height is 5’7.5, making 6’2.5 the match for that woman according to their standard. At 7’0 the match for that becomes so far from the mean it’s increase in female market selection isnt worth the net decreases of shorter women outside your range now you’re that tall.
 
how you gonna board a plane at 7 foot

you wont be able to travel the world:( unless by boat
6’5 is already uncomfortable in a plane, if you think 6’5 is the ideal height but somehow think 7’0 isnt then think again
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: yushmaxx
6’5 is already uncomfortable in a plane, if you think 6’5 is the ideal height but somehow think 7’0 isnt then think again
I mean im just going off of studies we already have, if you have evidence that 7’0 is better than 6’5 feel free to present it
 
  • JFL
Reactions: soggra
6’5 is already uncomfortable in a plane, if you think 6’5 is the ideal height but somehow think 7’0 isnt then think again
Also, imagine you find your dream girl but shes like five foot 6 how are yall gonna kiss
 
I mean im just going off of studies we already have, if you have evidence that 7’0 is better than 6’5 feel free to present it
why would there be any studies done on this? Only about 3000 7ft tall people in the world rn. Just think about the fact that a 7’0 man towers over a 6’5 man, 7’0 man is gonna outshine him
 
why would there be any studies done on this? Only about 3000 7ft tall people in the world rn. Just think about the fact that a 7’0 man towers over a 6’5 man, 7’0 man is gonna outshine him
i havent seen a 6’5 person in like 6 months now, giga ropefuel if your already 6’5 and you go outside only to get heightmogged by a 7’0 slayer JFL
 
  • +1
Reactions: tyowuwe and soggra
Also, imagine you find your dream girl but shes like five foot 6 how are yall gonna kiss
Life is not all about women, i mostly just like the idea of being very tall with long limbs its super aesthetically pleasing imo
i havent seen a 6’5 person in like 6 months now, giga ropefuel if your already 6’5 and you go outside only to get heightmogged by a 7’0 slayer JFL
Thats one way to prove my point
 
id rather be 7’0 tall than 6’5. Height doesnt have any diminishing returns until maybe over 7’5
Bro most 7’0+ are not genetically gifted athletes whose genes let them somehow support that height. You’d very likely be a lanklet with a life span of 30 and be in chronic pain with no status halo, and in that case all the girls that want to be with you are just fetishizing your height asw since you’d be a shriveled bean pole.

I’m 6’3 barefoot in an affluent suburb in Canada and only see a couple people taller than me when I’m out for a day, if any. In my school of 2000 only like 5 dudes were taller. in what world would you need to be 7’0, at 6’5 you’re 1000% maxing out height halo without fucked up health since you’d already be the tallest in any building. Deadass even 6’4 is enough it’s just that ppl who are 6’1 or 6’2 claiming 6’5 like marlon or mr beast making people think it’s not that tall (even then they’re tall asf in any media), an actual 6’5 is basically as tall as a door frame.

I’ve only seen like one dude who was remotely close to 7’0 this year and it was some guy at Costco around 6’10 who looked like he was abt to wither away😂good luck thinking u can even looking remotely like a normal human being without blasting roids or having Giannis’ genes

The avg 6’5 guy def has a higher quality of life and smv than the avg 7’0 guy. At 6’5 99% will have a good life whereas at 7’0+ you’re either the 1% of 7footers who are in the NBA (40 players) who are absolutely ballin ig which is what you’re thinking of or whatever other small percentage. However, the majority are just normal people with chronic spine pain. You’d wake, up go to the bathroom and die because you herniated 3 discs trying to bend forward to wipe your ass:lul:
 
  • +1
Reactions: tyowuwe
Bro most 7’0+ are not genetically gifted athletes whose genes let them somehow support that height. You’d very likely be a lanklet with a life span of 30 and be in chronic pain with no status halo, and in that case all the girls that want to be with you are just fetishizing your height asw since you’d be a shriveled bean pole.

I’m 6’3 barefoot in an affluent suburb in Canada and only see a couple people taller than me when I’m out for a day, if any. In my school of 2000 only like 5 dudes were taller. in what world would you need to be 7’0, at 6’5 you’re 1000% maxing out height halo without fucked up health since you’d already be the tallest in any building. Deadass even 6’4 is enough it’s just that ppl who are 6’1 or 6’2 claiming 6’5 like marlon or mr beast making people think it’s not that tall (even then they’re tall asf in any media), an actual 6’5 is basically as tall as a door frame.

I’ve only seen like one dude who was remotely close to 7’0 this year and it was some guy at Costco around 6’10 who looked like he was abt to wither away😂good luck thinking u can even looking remotely like a normal human being without blasting roids or having Giannis’ genes

The avg 6’5 guy def has a higher quality of life and smv than the avg 7’0 guy. At 6’5 99% will have a good life whereas at 7’0+ you’re either the 1% of 7footers who are in the NBA (40 players) who are absolutely ballin ig which is what you’re thinking of or whatever other small percentage. However, the majority are just normal people with chronic spine pain. You’d wake, up go to the bathroom and die because you herniated 3 discs trying to bend forward to wipe your ass:lul:
This is exactly why 6’5 is typically the peak. Any taller and you’re ending up like that one guy at your Costco JFL
 
  • +1
Reactions: realboyo
Bro most 7’0+ are not genetically gifted athletes whose genes let them somehow support that height. You’d very likely be a lanklet with a life span of 30 and be in chronic pain with no status halo, and in that case all the girls that want to be with you are just fetishizing your height asw since you’d be a shriveled bean pole.

I’m 6’3 barefoot in an affluent suburb in Canada and only see a couple people taller than me when I’m out for a day, if any. In my school of 2000 only like 5 dudes were taller. in what world would you need to be 7’0, at 6’5 you’re 1000% maxing out height halo without fucked up health since you’d already be the tallest in any building. Deadass even 6’4 is enough it’s just that ppl who are 6’1 or 6’2 claiming 6’5 like marlon or mr beast making people think it’s not that tall (even then they’re tall asf in any media), an actual 6’5 is basically as tall as a door frame.

I’ve only seen like one dude who was remotely close to 7’0 this year and it was some guy at Costco around 6’10 who looked like he was abt to wither away😂good luck thinking u can even looking remotely like a normal human being without blasting roids or having Giannis’ genes

The avg 6’5 guy def has a higher quality of life and smv than the avg 7’0 guy. At 6’5 99% will have a good life whereas at 7’0+ you’re either the 1% of 7footers who are in the NBA (40 players) who are absolutely ballin ig which is what you’re thinking of or whatever other small percentage. However, the majority are just normal people with chronic spine pain. You’d wake, up go to the bathroom and die because you herniated 3 discs trying to bend forward to wipe your ass:lul:
bro not every 7ft person has acromegaly. If your 7’0 because of genetics and not acromegaly than how would being that tall make you unhealthy?
 
bro not every 7ft person has acromegaly. If your 7’0 because of genetics and not acromegaly than how would being that tall make you unhealthy?
Much higher cardiovascular strain and tumor risk at such a height.
 
  • +1
Reactions: realboyo
  • +1
Reactions: tyowuwe
Dress Up National Basketball Association GIF by NBA

- This was made taking into account female dating app statical preferences where 5'11+ typically becomes the idealistic tipping point of mass appeal
- Also this is rooted in female preference on average (Ideally is 6-7 inches taller than their partner)
- This also mirrors the skewed ratings of the OK Cupid study done on women rating men

Manlet
2/10: 5'0'-5'1
2.5/10: 5'1-5'3
3/10: 5'3-5'5
3.5/10: 5'5-5'7

Heightcel

4/10: 5'7-5'9
4.5/10: 5'9-5'10

Bare Minimum
5/10: 5'10-5'11
5.5/10: 5'11-6'0

Tallish
6/10: 6'0-6'1
6.5/10: 6'1-6'1.5


Tall
7/10: 6'1.5-6'2
7.5/10: 6'2-6'3


Titan
8/10: 6'3-6'3.5
8.5/10: 6'3.5-6'4

Terra-Titan

9/10: 6'4-6'4.5
9.5/10: 6'4.5-6'5

Perfection

10/10: 6'5

"Why stop at 6'5. More Height is better boyo"

Height shows diminishing returns/negative yields at 6'6+. Maintaining an appealing physique at that height becomes near impossible too, hence why we see women capping their maximum height preference at around 6'4-6'5.

"5'9 is average why is it Heightcel range"
This is based on female preference not on actual averages. For example, studies show women rate the average man as below average attractiveness. But that makes no sense right? No shit it doesn't, they're hypergamous and unintelligent and have overinflated egos. You're skewed down lower than you actual statical place globally because women will always think the average man is richer, taller, hotter, and smarter than what they actually are.
repped because i was called a heightcel and not manlet
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: realboyo and tyowuwe

Similar threads

xlefort
Replies
27
Views
190
xlefort
xlefort
mi(r)in
Replies
28
Views
104
Kingofmallu
Kingofmallu
Kelner
Replies
5
Views
65
Kingly
Kingly
glamyrnui
Replies
2
Views
37
iblamerickyd
iblamerickyd
STZ||LLTN
Replies
6
Views
35
MROK1231
MROK1231

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →