tyowuwe
Bronze
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2025
- Posts
- 340
- Reputation
- 288
- This was made taking into account female dating app statical preferences where 5'11+ typically becomes the idealistic tipping point of mass appeal
- Also this is rooted in female preference on average (Ideally is 6-7 inches taller than their partner)
- This also mirrors the skewed ratings of the OK Cupid study done on women rating men
Manlet
2/10: 5'0'-5'1
2.5/10: 5'1-5'3
3/10: 5'3-5'5
3.5/10: 5'5-5'7
Heightcel
4/10: 5'7-5'9
4.5/10: 5'9-5'10
Bare Minimum
5/10: 5'10-5'11
5.5/10: 5'11-6'0
Tallish
6/10: 6'0-6'1
6.5/10: 6'1-6'1.5
Tall
7/10: 6'1.5-6'2
7.5/10: 6'2-6'3
Titan
8/10: 6'3-6'3.5
8.5/10: 6'3.5-6'4
Terra-Titan
9/10: 6'4-6'4.5
9.5/10: 6'4.5-6'5
Perfection
10/10: 6'5
"Why stop at 6'5. More Height is better boyo"
Height shows diminishing returns/negative yields at 6'6+. Maintaining an appealing physique at that height becomes near impossible too, hence why we see women capping their maximum height preference at around 6'4-6'5.
"5'9 is average why is it Heightcel range"
This is based on female preference not on actual averages. For example, studies show women rate the average man as below average attractiveness. But that makes no sense right? No shit it doesn't, they're hypergamous and unintelligent and have overinflated egos. You're skewed down lower than you actual statical place globally because women will always think the average man is richer, taller, hotter, and smarter than what they actually are.
