Personality type tests are stupid and childish

[Dr. Mog]

These men who classify themselves as INTJ, DICK DJ, Blowjob BJ or whatever are the male equivalent of females obsessed with astrology “omg, I’m a virgo, I gotta get railed raw before the end of this business month or else I’ll lose my aura uwu.”

Those ‘personality type’ tests are stupid imo. No one would tick all of the right answers in the questions as you would only answer of what you perceive yourself as.

You gotta have a straight forward unbiased noted points and perception of yourself in order to get the correct personality type which majority of the people lack. Classifying someone with the term introvert and extrovert doesn’t intrigue me either. Introverts tend to be extroverted around people with whom they know they are dominant with. You could be dominant in one social circle, mid in one more and a total outcasted ghost in another. Unlike looks, personality is fluid. It can attain the shape of the container in which it is occupied in and fit in.

For eg, you would stutter with a HTB cashier at an exit of a costco, while you would act dominant and may talk in an upper tone with a balding shortcel cashier in the same store. The same former ones who considered themselves introvert before; after that incident, now consider themselves an extrovert for talking roughly with their heads up. You are the same person with the same clothes buying the same things in the same store yet your NTness changed cause you have been put up with different types of people.

 

[IOS]

yes, we act more idiot in front of attractive people and try to act bold infront of uglier people

but why tf uglier people act vold infront of me
are they delusional or something?

 

[Deleted member 81858]

I thought the same thing and avoided them for years. I assumed they were a typical liberal/redditor type thing that was closely related to things like therapy etc. but upon doing them and making others do them I realised that they are somewhat accurate given that people generally respond to questions based on how they think, but of course its not 100% accurate.

I think the issue is that we are fed so much lies from foids and phycologists that we do a mental shortcut and assume its all wrong, which will be more right than wrong (its what I did), but theres still some value in this type of stuff even if its a bit cringe.

 

[Deleted member 103097]

Dnr. For understanding other people it's better than nothing, for understanding yourself it's pointless

 

[realshit]

Questi uomini che si classificano come INTJ, DICK DJ, Blowjob BJ o come altro sono l'equivalente maschile delle donne ossessionate dall'astrologia "Oddio, sono una vergine, devo farmi sfondare prima della fine di questo mese lavorativo, altrimenti perderò la mia aura, uwu".

Quei test di "tipo di personalità" sono stupidi secondo me. Nessuno metterebbe tutte le risposte giuste nelle domande, perché risponderesti solo a ciò che percepisci di te stesso .

Devi avere punti di vista e una percezione di te stesso diretti e imparziali per ottenere il tipo di personalità corretto che manca alla maggior parte delle persone. Classificare qualcuno con i termini introverso ed estroverso non mi intriga neanche. Gli introversi tendono a essere estroversi con le persone con cui sanno di essere dominanti. Potresti essere dominante in una cerchia sociale, mediocre in un'altra e un fantasma totalmente emarginato in un'altra. A differenza dell'aspetto, la personalità è fluida. Può assumere la forma del contenitore in cui è occupata e adattarsi.illola nera:

Ad esempio, balbetteresti con un cassiere HTB all'uscita di un Costco, mentre ti comporteresti in modo dominante e potresti parlare con un tono alto con un cassiere calvo e basso nello stesso negozio. Gli stessi ex che prima si consideravano introversi; dopo quell'incidente, ora si considerano estroversi perché parlano bruscamente a testa alta. Sei la stessa persona con gli stessi vestiti che compra le stesse cose nello stesso negozio, ma la tua NTness è cambiata perché sei stato messo a confronto con tipi diversi di persone.

completely agree

 

[MrMogger]

yes, we act more idiot in front of attractive people and try to act bold infront of uglier people

but why tf uglier people act vold infront of me
are they delusional or something?

Asking a question while trying to edge for an answer is stupid. Be direct. Against a bigger guy a smaller guy know the odds are clearly put against him. Acting "void" or ghosting the bigger guy is just another way for the wild manlet to survive another day unscathed.

 

[wizardcowboy]

Salutations, Dr Mog

First, the whole Introvert/Extrovert characterization is outdated and a misrepresentation of the bigger picture. Puts too much emphasis on archetypes and not enough to the specific traits.
The personality test I believe you are referring to with those characterizations is the Myer-Briggs Test

, which is outdated and has more of a zodiac cult type following; where people attribute changeable behaviors/actions or lack thereof to a specific archetype.

A test like the Hexaco

, has no classifications but scores individually on 6 trait-based metrics (Honest-Humility, Emotionality, Extraversion...) with respect to the mean of test-takers.
Here is a Hexaco result of mine from October this year-

Although psychology and psychoanalysis was/is largely based in pseudoscience, modern personality tests try to place an individual on a spectrum of common, generalized traits that applies to most people. Answering truthfully can help one see where they score on select traits compared to an average.

No one would tick all of the right answers in the questions as you would only answer of what you perceive yourself as.

This may seem obvious, but usually how you genuinely perceive yourself catalyzes how others perceive you. Key emphasis on the word genuinely. Even if you are deluded to an extent and genuinely believe yourself as something you possibly are not, people will respond as though you were (false positive equivalency), unless it's blatantly obvious/ easily discernable that you aren't. On the other hand people can smell fabrication, ingenuity, so you aren't fooling yourself nor others.

Unlike looks, personality is fluid. It can attain the shape of the container in which it is occupied in and fit in.

You could deliberately differ your characters for different audiences, and others would only know you by what you display towards them. No one knows you as deeply as you know yourself (no one cares to actually) and no one has access to your inner dialogues.

For eg, you would stutter with a HTB cashier at an exit of a costco, while you would act dominant and may talk in an upper tone with a balding shortcel cashier in the same store. The same former ones who considered themselves introvert before; after that incident, now consider themselves an extrovert for talking roughly with their heads up. You are the same person with the same clothes buying the same things in the same store yet your NTness changed cause you have been put up with different types of people.

Regardless of personality, people consciously/subconsciously will behave differently in different scenarios (unless they are a humanoid or deep on the spectrum)
You would act differently if you're aiming to impress someone vs just minding your business. You also would act differently depending on your perception of the others value/rank or potential contributions that can be made towards you.

Unless rankings/positions in social hierarchy are explicitly stated, most interactions between two people is a tug for power over the other. How they go about it depends on their individual traits

 

[Dr. Mog]

Salutations, Dr Mog

First, the whole Introvert/Extrovert characterization is outdated and a misrepresentation of the bigger picture. Puts too much emphasis on archetypes and not enough to the specific traits.
The personality test I believe you are referring to with those characterizations is the Myer-Briggs TestView attachment 3366460, which is outdated and has more of a zodiac cult type following; where people attribute changeable behaviors/actions or lack thereof to a specific archetype.

A test like the HexacoView attachment 3366456, has no classifications but scores individually on 6 trait-based metrics (Honest-Humility, Emotionality, Extraversion...) with respect to the mean of test-takers.
Here is a Hexaco result of mine from October this year-View attachment 3366605


Although psychology and psychoanalysis was/is largely based in pseudoscience, modern personality tests try to place an individual on a spectrum of common, generalized traits that applies to most people. Answering truthfully can help one see where they score on select traits compared to an average.


This may seem obvious, but usually how you genuinely perceive yourself catalyzes how others perceive you. Key emphasis on the word genuinely. Even if you are deluded to an extent and genuinely believe yourself as something you possibly are not, people will respond as though you were (false positive equivalency), unless it's blatantly obvious/ easily discernable that you aren't. On the other hand people can smell fabrication, ingenuity, so you aren't fooling yourself nor others.

You could deliberately differ your characters for different audiences, and others would only know you by what you display towards them. No one knows you as deeply as you know yourself (no one cares to actually) and no one has access to your inner dialogues.

Regardless of personality, people consciously/subconsciously will behave differently in different scenarios (unless they are a humanoid or deep on the spectrum)
You would act differently if you're aiming to impress someone vs just minding your business. You also would act differently depending on your perception of the others value/rank or potential contributions that can be made towards you.

Unless rankings/positions in social hierarchy are explicitly stated, most interactions between two people is a tug for power over the other. How they go about it depends on their individual traits

Salutations, ChatGPT GrAYcel

Care to explain what point are you trying to make here other than by showing me yet another new way to fool myself with a personality test?

 

[AlphaLooksmaxxer666]

yeah me too even personality is dictated by genetics not a test

 

[Xangsane]

These men who classify themselves as INTJ, DICK DJ, Blowjob BJ or whatever are the male equivalent of females obsessed with astrology “omg, I’m a virgo, I gotta get railed raw before the end of this business month or else I’ll lose my aura uwu.”

Those ‘personality type’ tests are stupid imo. No one would tick all of the right answers in the questions as you would only answer of what you perceive yourself as.

You gotta have a straight forward unbiased noted points and perception of yourself in order to get the correct personality type which majority of the people lack. Classifying someone with the term introvert and extrovert doesn’t intrigue me either. Introverts tend to be extroverted around people with whom they know they are dominant with. You could be dominant in one social circle, mid in one more and a total outcasted ghost in another. Unlike looks, personality is fluid. It can attain the shape of the container in which it is occupied in and fit in.

For eg, you would stutter with a HTB cashier at an exit of a costco, while you would act dominant and may talk in an upper tone with a balding shortcel cashier in the same store. The same former ones who considered themselves introvert before; after that incident, now consider themselves an extrovert for talking roughly with their heads up. You are the same person with the same clothes buying the same things in the same store yet your NTness changed cause you have been put up with different types of people.

you should see the thread where people are lining up on here to get wife predictions on indian type astrology. And these often have a high accuracy rate

 

[Dr. Mog]

you should see the thread where people are lining up on here to get wife predictions on indian type astrology. And these often have a high accuracy rate

Might work but still heavily superstitious.

It’s works on focusing on the birth date and time of the person, this would allow the astrologist to dictate which stars in the universe have aligned at what time. They would then check the star alignment of the significant partner/girlfriend/spouse to measure the comparability between them.

Not exactly sure how this works but yeah that’s about it.

 

[Darkeningstar]

I partly agree. Although I don't like mtbi distinctions, regarding the part about extroversion you consider a superficial nomenclature.

Clearly seeing it in a binary way is wrong, and most people tend to be pole-oriented rather than very extroverted or very introverted.

 

[Xangsane]

Might work but still heavily superstitious.

It’s works on focusing on the birth date and time of the person, this would allow the astrologist to dictate which stars in the universe have aligned at what time. They would then check the star alignment of the significant partner/girlfriend/spouse to measure the comparability between them.

Not exactly sure how this works but yeah that’s about it.

since this is sidereal (pajeet) method they solely use the native's D1 and D9 charts to determine (with precision) the looks of the spouse. Nothing about compatibility

even the D8 they can predict life expectancy

 

[flippasav]

I think they’re simply false

 

[Dr. Mog]

but why tf uglier people act vold infront of me
are they delusional or something?

It’s an inbuilt defence mechanism; inferior beings tend to estimate you will view them as someone below you which is why they try their best to look down on your first to showcase themselves and (try to) assert dominance.

 

[wizardcowboy]

Salutations, ChatGPT GrAYcel

Care to explain what point are you trying to make here other than by showing me yet another new way to fool myself with a personality test?

No GPT here bud, straight off the dome. I guess my point was certain personality tests could offer insight on how you measure up towards the average in different traits. It's not a bad or good thing nor is it mystical or predicting anything

 

[Tenzen Thenziro]

No GPT here bud, straight off the dome. I guess my point was certain personality tests could offer insight on how you measure up towards the average in different traits. It's not a bad or good thing nor is it mystical or predicting anything

If you dive deep into the mbti functions, carl jung works and the big five (the most scientific personality test), a bigger picture of your personality can be created, just simple ISTP and or some shit is not a good lead.

 

[Tenzen Thenziro]

The shadow self gaved me insight about some hidden talents and desires (boxing and gym at 16).

 

[wizardcowboy]

unfortunately you are just saying buzzwords with no understanding of their meaning, its my fault for responding to this tarded post

 

[Deleted member 110111]

These men who classify themselves as INTJ, DICK DJ, Blowjob BJ or whatever are the male equivalent of females obsessed with astrology “omg, I’m a virgo, I gotta get railed raw before the end of this business month or else I’ll lose my aura uwu.”

Those ‘personality type’ tests are stupid imo. No one would tick all of the right answers in the questions as you would only answer of what you perceive yourself as.

You gotta have a straight forward unbiased noted points and perception of yourself in order to get the correct personality type which majority of the people lack. Classifying someone with the term introvert and extrovert doesn’t intrigue me either. Introverts tend to be extroverted around people with whom they know they are dominant with. You could be dominant in one social circle, mid in one more and a total outcasted ghost in another. Unlike looks, personality is fluid. It can attain the shape of the container in which it is occupied in and fit in.

For eg, you would stutter with a HTB cashier at an exit of a costco, while you would act dominant and may talk in an upper tone with a balding shortcel cashier in the same store. The same former ones who considered themselves introvert before; after that incident, now consider themselves an extrovert for talking roughly with their heads up. You are the same person with the same clothes buying the same things in the same store yet your NTness changed cause you have been put up with different types of people.

I am sigma

 

[Deleted member 119232]

I am sigma

You are gay