JammyCel
Banned
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2024
- Posts
- 65
- Reputation
- 52
I know people constantly say that "Pete davidson is carried by height and d-ck size" but this isnt entirely true. Lets observe this man gayly shall we?
what can i say, he looks hardmonious, he has decent features. and he looks better than tom holland. people whom call this guy ugly are copers. even without height he would still be high MTN. pete davidson is realistically Low HTN. similar rating to that of timothee chalamet. Pete Davidson is not bad looking although he has a good clump of facial flaws.
moral of the story, use a better example when shitting on a celebrity for looks, this guy has so much feminine appeal that guys dont even realize
what can i say, he looks hardmonious, he has decent features. and he looks better than tom holland. people whom call this guy ugly are copers. even without height he would still be high MTN. pete davidson is realistically Low HTN. similar rating to that of timothee chalamet. Pete Davidson is not bad looking although he has a good clump of facial flaws.
moral of the story, use a better example when shitting on a celebrity for looks, this guy has so much feminine appeal that guys dont even realize