Petition to revoke the allowance of homosexuals™ on .me

[Deleted member 6475]

Isn't that why you were unbanned in the first place kek?

Shut up fucking AI

 

[Deleted member 11406]

This is a serious case

Serious case is the jb mega thread tier, that's was a serious case

 

[Ritalincel]

Shut up fucking AI

I'll take that as a yes

I agree with your post though, fags should indeed be disallowed from posting here .

 

[Deleted member 6475]

I'll take that as a yes

I agree with your post though, fags should indeed be disallowed from posting here .

Vote then. Every vote counts

 

[Copeful]

I'll take that as a yes

I agree with your post though, fags should indeed be disallowed from posting here .

Holy shit this dude finally said something that makes sense

 

[Deleted member 6475]

If you’re gonna make a proposition, at least make a proper one. Revoking the rule if 50.1% has voted for it would only be fair if the vast majority of the userbase has participated in voting, otherwise it’s inherently unfair.

It ends in 2 days. i think most people that are here regularly will have voted.
We can also make it i dont know any percentage thats not absurdly high.
70% like its right now should be pretty telling already tho.

 

[Hightwolf]

Bro your poll is shit because it doesn't account for low iq fucks like me.
I saw the post say 'revoke the allowance of homosexuals' so I just clicked yes. Who tf reads poll titles.

 

[Deleted member 7173]

This is such bullshit, since when does a blackpilled website allow homos. This is arguably worse than allowing jews

 

[Alexanderr]

It ends in 2 days. i think most people that are here regularly will have voted.

If that were the case, hundreds of people would’ve voted by now.

We can also make it i dont know any percentage thats not absurdly high.
70% like its right now should be pretty telling already tho.

I’m guessing you’ll receive at most 200 votes (a signficant part of those against the revocation), while there’s easily triple that amount of users on the forum every day. Besides, you haven’t actually brought up a proper argument.

 

[Deleted member 6475]

Bro your poll is shit because it doesn't account for low iq fucks like me.
I saw the post say 'revoke the allowance of homosexuals' so I just clicked yes. Who tf reads poll titles.

Thats why i put the option to change vote

 

[Deleted member 4612]

 

[Deleted member 6475]

If that were the case, hundreds of people would’ve voted by now.

I’m guessing you’ll receive at most 200 votes (a signficant part of those against the revocation), while there’s easily triple that amount of users on forum every day. Besides, you haven’t actually brought up a proper argument.

The argument is that we are here to talk about attracting women. Gays have it much easier to get laid / have a succesful sex life than hetero men. Even at 3psl that is a very common scenario. They hop on Grindr and boom sex in a timespan of a few hours no matter their smv or whatever.

Also they have different looks standards and goals so its not productive to have them here at all.

Next point is the clarity of what you can say and what you can not say. People get banned thinking they are totally safe. So either ban it entirely or allow it entirely. Also allowing gay people is the first step to allowing more degeneracy women transgenders et cetera.

@her mogs

 

[Deleted member 6908]

Focus on LooksMaxing yourself rather than using your hatred for the women who confuse you for being invisible, to take out on batty boys.

 

[Copeful]

Focus on LooksMaxing yourself rather than using your hatred for the women who confuse you for being invisible, to take out on batty boys.

 

[Deleted member 6475]

Focus on LooksMaxing yourself rather than using your hatred for the women who confuse you for being invisible, to take out on batty boys.

You were a male prostitute on cam sites and whored yourself out. Your opinion on this topic has 0 value in this degeneracy free democratic poll.

 

[Alexanderr]

The argument is that we are here to talk about attracting women. Gays have it much easier to get laid / have a succesful sex life than hetero men. Even at 3psl that is a very common scenario. They hop on Grindr and boom sex in a timespan of a few hours no matter their smv or whatever.

Also they have different looks standards and goals so its not productive to have them here at all.

Then why not bring that up in your initial post? I suppose you brought up a decent argument, however, gays have never been prevented from joining the forum.

No one brings up their sexuality in applications, which is why you wouldn’t be able to bar them from joining, the vast majority of gay men on the forum never mentioning their sexuality either.

I for one don’t care if the rule gets revoked or not since it doesn’t change anything aside from @RealSurgerymax getting banned even though he’s been a big help to anyone with questions regarding surgery etc...

 

[Deleted member 6475]

Then why not bring that up in your initial post? I suppose you brought up a decent argument, however, gays have never been prevented from joining the forum.

No one brings up their sexuality in applications, which is why you wouldn’t be able to bar them from joining, the vast majority of gay men on the forum never mentioning their sexuality either.

I for one don’t care if the rule gets revoked or not since it doesn’t change anything aside from @RealSurgerymax getting banned even though he’s been a big help to anyone with questions regarding surgery etc...

Why are you trying to appeal to my empathy? How does that have anything to do with anything.
This is also about principles and preventing further deterioration of the forum. Today we allow gays to be here in 2 weeks we can have pride flags in a month we can tell each other to make gangbang orgys etc. This is not a good spirit for the forum at all if we allow that to happen. Thats just the gateway to 4chan 2.0.

Of course gay people could still hide here. But if they say they are gay they would get banned. Easy as that.

 

[here]

ban all gays EXCEPT @RealSurgerymax or allow people to make gay jokes and unban @goat2x tbh

 

[owlofathena]

Fuck you @austrianvirgin the site benefits from having gay members

 

[Deleted member 6475]

Fuck you @austrianvirgin the site benefits from having gay members

It does not

 

[Deleted member 6908]

It does not

It actually does because they know what makes a man attractive. They have the natural sexual attraction to men.

We on the other hand have to use science.

Also quit being so emotional. Your estrogen levels can be smelt from London.

 

[owlofathena]

I'll take that as a yes

I agree with your post though, fags should indeed be disallowed from posting here .

Robot indeed

 

[owlofathena]

It actually does because they know what makes a man attractive. They have the natural sexual attraction to men.

We on the other hand have to use science.

Also quit being so emotional. Your estrogen levels can be smelt from London.

Gay men are the biggest looksmaxxers

 

[Deleted member 6475]

It actually does because they know what makes a man attractive. They have the natural sexual attraction to men.

We on the other hand have to use science.

Also quit being so emotional. Your estrogen levels can be smelt from London.

They know what makes a man attractive FOR THEM not for WOMEN. Okay?
Gays also use eyeliner to make themselves "more presentable" for their Top.. would you do that to attract women?
They dont know more than the average normie about attracting women. And their personalities obviously are also much different than ours. So are their pasts and yeah it just doesnt match.

 

[Stare]

I don't care at all about wether gays are allowed or not but if they are then people shouldn't get banned for gay jokes, specially in the offtopic section

 

[owlofathena]

@Trungvu cuck for voting no

 

[Deleted member 6908]

They know what makes a man attractive FOR THEM not for WOMEN. Okay?
Gays also use eyeliner to make themselves "more presentable" for their Top.. would you do that to attract women?
They dont know more than the average normie about attracting women. And their personalities obviously are also much different than ours. So are their pasts and yeah it just doesnt match.

I don't know about so much different from "ours". Certainly mine, but your emotional hysterics are definitely something I'm sure the average fag would be able to relate to.

 

[Deleted member 8461]

wtf gays are natural looksmaxxers. 100% of them are softmaxxed to the fullest and a bigger ratio of gay to straight men get surgeries. @Win200 is based and provided the forum with more useful information in a single thread than most of you niggers with your fucking 5,000+ posts. Fucking lol @ you sad edgelords trying to exclude gays because you think it makes you more like chad. Chad has dozens of gay friends you low IQ monkeys

 

[Deleted member 6475]

I don't know about so much different from "yours". Certainly mine, but your emotional hysterics are definitely something I'm sure the average fag would be able to relate to.

What emotional hysterics are you talking about you cappucinoskinned infiltrator

 

[Alexanderr]

Why are you trying to appeal to my empathy? How does that have anything to do with anything.

This is also about principles and preventing further deterioration of the forum. Today we allow gays to be here in 2 weeks we can have pride flags in a month we can tell each other to make gangbang orgys etc. This is not a good spirit for the forum at all if we allow that to happen.

Here I am wondering why you didn’t bring any of this up in your initial post, would’ve made a lot more sense if you did.

I’m just guessing here but I think the rule wasn’t made with the intent of preventing the presence of homosexuals but rather merely the prevention of the forum getting filled with gay content but since simply stating your sexuality could be interpreted as gay content, many interpreted it as the disallowance of homosexuals as a whole.

I mean, it makes sense, does it not?
If the rule was made with the intention of disallowing homosexuals, it would’ve evidently stated so instead of doing it in a rather vague manner.

 

[Deleted member 3323]

I advocate for not removing the rule since now users who already get bullied for revealing their orientation now cant take back what they said, removing the rule will worsen it.

 

[Deleted member 9048]

@Trungvu cuck for voting no

 

[Deleted member 6475]

wtf gays are natural looksmaxxers. 100% of them are softmaxxed to the fullest and a bigger ratio of gay to straight men get surgeries. @Win200 is based and provided the forum with more useful information in a single thread than most of you niggers with your fucking 5,000+ posts. Fucking lol @ you sad edgelords trying to exclude gays because you think it makes you more like chad. Chad has dozens of gay friends you low IQ monkeys

 

[Deleted member 6475]

I advocate for not removing the rule since now users who already get bullied for revealing their orientation now cant take back what they said, removing the rule will worsen it.

Have to bring casualties. So many didnt reveal it anyway.

 

[Deleted member 6908]

What emotional hysterics are you talking about you cappucinoskinned infiltrator

I just don't get why you're so 'passionate' about this topic. It makes zero sense to me.

The place is hardly in danger of becoming an online gay-bar.

 

[Deleted member 6475]

I’m just guessing here but I think the rule wasn’t made with the intent of preventing the presence of homosexuals but rather merely the prevention of the forum getting filled with gay content but since simply stating your sexuality could be interpreted as gay content, many interpreted it as the disallowance of homosexuals as a whole.

I mean, it makes sense, does it not?
If the rule was made with the intention of disallowing homosexuals, it would’ve evidently stated so instead of doing it in a rather vague manner.

I am for a total prohibiton of gays. That would be harder than the original rules then. Sure would be. It would change the spirit of the forum to the better again tho. And the influx of gay content lately also speaks for my side of the story.

 

[Deleted member 6475]

I just don't get why you're so 'passionate' about this topic. It makes zero sense to me.

The place is hardly in danger of becoming an online gay-bar.

I speak for those who are not brave enough to do it.

 

[Deleted member 6908]

I speak for those who are not brave enough to do it.

Gimme a fucking break man. You sound like a fucking activist for women who've been raped or beaten by their partners.

 

[Deleted member 6475]

Gimme a fucking break man. You sound like a fucking activist for women who've been raped or beaten by their partners.

Okay i was trolling with that one. But i think i made my point clear already.

 

[Deleted member 8461]

View attachment 905099
Holy shit this dude finally said something that makes sense

i'm pretty sure ritalincel is bisexual

 

[Deleted member 10536]

should i vote yes or no bro

Low t trait ngl

 

[RAITEIII]

If you’re gonna make a proposition, at least make a proper one. Revoking the rule if 50.1% has voted for it would only be fair if the vast majority of the userbase has participated in voting, otherwise it’s inherently unfair.

But this was implemented without taking into account what many of us said? In fact till this day I hold my opinion that this was poorly thought by whoever was behind this.

The fact that openly gay men were not be allowed here does not mean anyone here has to be homophobic or repressors JFL. You have communities for all type of people, blacks, Indians, whites, gays, lesbians. It does not mean they're trying to exclude anyone or that they have anything against people. They just want a place with people who share a lot of similarities.

Stating that you're gay is completely irrelevant for the nature of this forum. And even if someone wants to claim that it's to "specify different aesthethics" then what the hell does that mean? That now there exists some type of place on this forum for men who are looking forward being gay and completely deviated from what most of us? JFL according to this rule u can start make up tutorials specifying that since you're gay you're looking for different aesthethics so it may not be applicable for average user.

It's completely disrespectful and dishonest for anyone who is gay to be used for "whatever tips they have" and then be told "oh dont say you're gay too much", in fact don't talk about anything whatsoever. It defeats the purpose of trying to be inclusive of gay community.

If someone likes the community and is gay, like that high iq surgeon, they are free to join and keep their sexuality private, after all it's nobody's business nor has any relevance in any post! He didn't need ever to say "I'm gay" to feel accepted on this forum.

I am someone who "supports" LGBT community but understand that this could change the nature of this forum.

 

[Alexanderr]

But this was implemented without taking into account what many of us said? In fact till this day I hold my opinion that this was poorly thought by whoever was behind this.

Read my post above, I’m pretty sure the rule wasn’t meant to prevent the presence of gay people from the start but rather solely gay content.

 

[Deleted member 6892]

Voted no
No homos on .me

 

[Deleted member 9072]

wtf gays are natural looksmaxxers. 100% of them are softmaxxed to the fullest and a bigger ratio of gay to straight men get surgeries. @Win200 is based and provided the forum with more useful information in a single thread than most of you niggers with your fucking 5,000+ posts. Fucking lol @ you sad edgelords trying to exclude gays because you think it makes you more like chad. Chad has dozens of gay friends you low IQ monkeys

This @Win200 looks like an utter fag
he looksmaxxed to look gay

 

[RAITEIII]

Then why not bring that up in your initial post? I suppose you brought up a decent argument, however, gays have never been prevented from joining the forum.

No one brings up their sexuality in applications, which is why you wouldn’t be able to bar them from joining, the vast majority of gay men on the forum never mentioning their sexuality either.

I for one don’t care if the rule gets revoked or not since it doesn’t change anything aside from @RealSurgerymax getting banned even though he’s been a big help to anyone with questions regarding surgery etc...

if surgerymaxx were to be banned then itd be shown that the staff members don't mind taking actions that will bring negative repercussions to the forum.

Surgerymaxx is the best example as to why this wasn't needed. He had been here for a long time and never considered to be an issue the fact that he's keeping his sexuality in private. Simply because he's a high iq individual and he doesn't need to let all the world know that he's gay in any single situation he's involved with. If that's how anyone feels that's not my business.

 

[Deleted member 6892]

It actually does because they know what makes a man attractive. They have the natural sexual attraction to men.

We on the other hand have to use science.

Also quit being so emotional. Your estrogen levels can be smelt from London.

What gays find attractive in men is not the same as what women find attractive in men

 

[Deleted member 6908]

What gays find attractive in men is not the same as what women find attractive in men

Ok.

Question for you:

Do women find particular gay guys attractive on a level beyond any other? Yes or no? They are natural looksmaxers.

 

[Alexanderr]

Surgerymaxx is the best example as to why this wasn't needed. He had been here for a long time and never considered to be an issue the fact that he's keeping his sexuality in private. Simply because he's a high iq individual and he doesn't need to let all the world know that he's gay in any single situation he's involved with. If that's how anyone feels that's not my business.

I’m just guessing here but I think the rule wasn’t made with the intent of preventing the presence of homosexuals but rather merely the prevention of the forum getting filled with gay content but since simply stating your sexuality could be interpreted as gay content, many interpreted it as the disallowance of homosexuals as a whole.

I mean, it makes sense, does it not?
If the rule was made with the intention of disallowing homosexuals, it would’ve evidently stated so instead of doing it in a rather vague manner.

 

[Deleted member 6908]

What gays find attractive in men is not the same as what women find attractive in men

Also you must realise that Gay guys love hetrosexual Straight guys.

So much so they are setting themselves as 'female' on apps like tinder and both appearing on my swiping and liking me.