[PhD Research Paper] Illusions of Grandeur: Tracing 1STMAN’s Psychological Decline

Seth Walsh

Seth Walsh

The man in the mirror is my only threat
Contributor
Joined
Jan 12, 2020
Posts
8,529
Reputation
16,289

1STMAN (Kris-Paul Sturmey): Psychological Profile and Downward Spiral​


Background and Persona​


Kris-Paul Sturmey (online alias “1STMAN”) is a London-based men’s lifestyle influencer who launched the 1STMAN brand (blog/YouTube) in his mid-20s. In a 2017 interview, a 25‑year‑old Sturmey described himself as an “entrepreneur and director” creating self‑improvement content for menthemanblueprint.comthemanblueprint.com. The 1STMAN website today markets a testosterone‑boosting supplement (“Male Advantage”) and a weekly membership community on Skool1st-man.com. On camera, he projects a hyper‑masculine “high value” persona – ostentatiously referencing luxury cars, workout routines, and alpha male rhetoric. Critics note that this image has evolved into a performance: forum analysts argue that 1STMAN’s constant bravado (e.g. boasting of “thousands” of female conquests) serves as “compensatory grandiosity” to mask deep insecuritylooksmax.org. In sum, the official narrative is self‑improvement and success, but outside observers see a fragile persona built on unverified claims.


Key Life Events and Triggers (Timeline)​


  • Mid‑20s (≈2018) – Sturmey began experiencing significant hair loss (male‑pattern baldness). Early content focused on “mewing” (jaw exercises) and hair remedies. According to analysts, losing his hair in his mid‑20s was a narcissistic injury: he initially blamed temporary causes (“telogen effluvium”) but eventually realized his genes were the causelooksmax.org. This loss of a key masculinity symbol purportedly “shattered his identity,” triggering overcompensation through deepening his voice, aggressive posture and misogynistic talklooksmax.orglooksmax.org.
  • Mid‑20s – Around the same period, Sturmey either left or lost his (reported) finance career. Online evidence (a Medium author page and forum claims) suggests he had worked in hedge funds or private equitylooksmax.orgmedium.com. Analysts note that by age 26 he was “unemployed and just using inheritance” despite claiming a “top finance job”looksmax.org. This abrupt career collapse forced him to fund his lifestyle through online ventures (renting luxury cars for videos, selling courses, etc.).
  • 2021 (Age ~28) – Sturmey’s father died, leaving an inheritance. Walsh’s analysis (and forum discussion) indicates he inherited significant money but refused to admit it, instead portraying himself as “self‑made”looksmax.orglooksmax.org. This unresolved “parenteral legacy trauma” is thought to underlie both guilt and denial: he publicly belittles others’ inherited wealth while privately depending on itlooksmax.org. His digital persona became more lavish around this time (green‑screen penthouse shots, claims of 100K+ monthly revenue)looksmax.orglooksmax.org, arguably to prove his success to a father he can no longer impress.
  • August 2022 (30th Birthday) – A major inflection point occurred just before Sturmey’s 30th birthday when a popular YouTuber (“Memeulous”) released a mocking critique of 1STMAN. According to forum reports, Sturmey reacted strongly: one commentator noted he was “crying over a Memeulous vid on his 30th birthday,” even emailing Memeulous about itlooksmax.org. He himself ominously said that “a weaker man would commit suicide over this” critiquelooksmax.org. Walsh and others consider this humiliation a tipping point: turning 30 (and being bald) made Sturmey feel “it’s pretty much over” for his dreamslooksmax.orglooksmax.org. Observers see the Memeulous video as accelerating his despair and driving him deeper into delusional defenses.
  • 2023–2024 – In the aftermath, Sturmey doubled down on monetization schemes. He launched a paid “Skool” coaching membership and a flagship program called “1M House” (promising access to luxury international homes). Independent investigators quickly called “1M House” a scam: subscribers paid thousands, but there were no actual houses behind the offerreddit.comreddit.com. Critics noted Sturmey deleted or disabled all negative comments on these sales pitchesreddit.comreddit.com. Meanwhile he continued producing content: some collaborations (e.g. with influencer Rob Lipsett) kept him in the loop, but others (and his own audience) increasingly viewed him as a cautionary case study. In mid‑2024, influential men’s forums (looksmax.org) began detailed exposés of his trajectory, predicting collapselooksmax.orglooksmax.org.

Financial and Professional Status​


Sturmey’s actual finances appear precarious. The 1STMAN brand sells supplements, apparel and courses1st-man.com, but there is little evidence these generate substantial profit. Forum analysts assert he is effectively unemployed and living off inheritancelooksmax.orglooksmax.org. For example, one forum member bluntly states that at age ~35 he’s “mid 30s, completely unemployed, renting an apartment off the money from his Dad’s will”looksmax.org. Walsh echoes this view: he writes that Sturmey’s income comes from family money while claiming false high earningslooksmax.orglooksmax.org. Meanwhile, his public ventures raise red flags. The “1M House” program – charging ~$3,000 for access to non‑existent housing – was labeled “basically a timeshare but way overpriced” by a concerned YouTuberreddit.comreddit.com. All negative questions about this project were reportedly deleted from his channelsreddit.comreddit.com. In short, observers believe Sturmey’s financial situation is likely defined by debt and dwindling assets, rather than sustainable business successlooksmax.orglooksmax.org.


Social Relationships and Isolation​


There are no publicly known romantic relationships in Sturmey’s life. Forum analysts conclude he is almost certainly single and likely a virgin, despite his boasts. As Walsh notes, Sturmey’s claims of huge numbers of partners are “textbook overcompensation” for lonelinesslooksmax.org. His rhetoric about women is exceptionally hostile or transactional: framing himself as the one who “rejects” women allows him to project his fear of rejection and vulnerabilitylooksmax.org. Likewise, he cultivates few friends. One commentary observes that “women avoid him due to his instability; male peers see him as a joke”looksmax.org. In other words, his arrogance and transactional view of relationships repel genuine connection, creating a feedback loop: “arrogance... repels genuine connection, trapping him in a cycle of loneliness → grandiosity → further isolation”looksmax.org. This social isolation feeds into his persona – he increasingly uses his audience as entertainment (or a self‑affirming “case study”) rather than seeking real companionshiplooksmax.orglooksmax.org.


Defense Mechanisms and Personality Traits​


  • Narcissistic Compensation: Sturmey shows classic narcissistic defense. He inflates achievements and desirability to ward off shame. For example, he boasts of “thousands” of female conquests despite no evidence; analysts say this is a fantasy masking the opposite realitylooksmax.org. His moral code is rigidly performance‑based: he must appear dominant, successful and unemotional. When confronted, he deploys reaction formation – expressing contempt or hatred (for women, for “haters,” etc.) that is interpreted as a defense against his own vulnerability. For instance, his lengthy rants about “prostitutes” in Barcelona are seen not as genuine outrage but as projection of self-loathing: he hates that he must pay for intimacy he secretly cannot attain, so he blames the womenlooksmax.org.
  • Denial and Splitting: He habitually denies reality that threatens his ego. Walsh notes he persisted in claiming he was “self‑made” even after inheriting wealth, a denial of dependencylooksmax.orglooksmax.org. He also splits people into “high value” vs. “losers,” absolving himself of empathy. This black‑and‑white thinking lets him avoid acknowledging any weakness. Even about age, his self-talk oscillates wildly: in one video he raves about being a 20s boss-man, in another he frets obsessively about turning 30. His commentators see this as a fragmented identity and evidence he must dissociate when faced with dissonancelooksmax.org.
  • Projection: Sturmey projects many of his feelings onto others. He repeatedly accuses others of the very things he fears. For example, he often claims that society (or other men) are weak/unclean, mirroring his own fear of inadequacylooksmax.orglooksmax.org. Forum analysts especially note that he projects self-doubt onto women: his misogyny is viewed as a shield for anxiety about intimacylooksmax.org.
  • Compulsive Grandiosity: Maintaining a grandiose image consumes him. He constantly seeks external validation (views, subscriptions, paid programs) to shore up his self-worth. Walsh describes this as an “external validation trap,” noting that Sturmey ties his entire identity to sex, money and statuslooksmax.orglooksmax.org. This leaves him on shaky ground: any hit to his image (negative comments, age reality, financial loss) threatens severe emotional collapse.
  • Intellectual Rigidity / Possible Deficits: Critics often remark that Sturmey seems naïve or cognitively rigid. One forum post bluntly states, “I don’t think he’s particularly intelligent tbh”looksmax.org. His repeated mistakes – believing his own hype, ignoring obvious business flaws, failing to see contradictions – suggest deficits in insight. He has not adjusted his strategy despite failing to deliver on promises (e.g. no houses for “1M House”), indicating poor self-reflection. His inability to truthfully assess himself (e.g. admitting if he were actually wealthy or successful) also shows low cognitive/emotional awareness.
  • Emotional Inauthenticity: Sturmey rarely appears emotionally genuine. His videos and posts are scripted and performative. Walsh’s analysis concludes he is a “deeply lonely individual trapped in a self-created prison of lies”looksmax.org. He rarely expresses natural vulnerability; instead he switches between bravado and rage. Maintaining this façade reportedly leaves him “emotionally bankrupt,” draining him so he eventually “goes numb” or has anger outburstslooksmax.org. This chronic inauthenticity means he lacks real empathy or vulnerability; he cannot form trust and, paradoxically, becomes more isolated.

Coping with Aging and Appearance​


Sturmey’s coping style revolves around extreme “looksmaxxing.” Losing his hair and youth triggered an identity crisis, and he responded by trying to physically optimize himself. He has produced tutorials on posture, grooming, fitness, and runs a “Male Advantage” supplement line1st-man.com. These efforts can be seen as ritualistic attempts to reclaim lost youth. However, observers view them as defensive: Walsh notes that his “hypermasculine” transformation (deep voice, gym obsession, scolding tone) is essentially a reaction-formation against his fear of weaknesslooksmax.orglooksmax.org. Instead of accepting aging, he denies reality through these obsessions. As he himself put it, he started training his jaw with mewing exercises when hair loss beganlooksmax.org. In sum, his physical self-improvement is less about wellness and more about symbolically battling the passage of time and proving to himself (and others) that he remains a “high-value” man.


Current Phase: Downward Spiral​


All these factors have converged into what commentators describe as a downward psychological spiral. Forums predict that 1STMAN’s current trajectory leads to burnout or breakdown. As Walsh warns, once his scams collapse or he’s exposed, the expected outcome is a mental health crisis (depression, suicidal ideation) or total withdrawal from his online lifelooksmax.org. Indeed, his own statements – like the “suicide” comment after the Memeulous video – suggest suicidal thoughts lurk beneath his bravadolooksmax.org. Analysts outline two bleak scenarios: an implosion where failure and public humiliation trigger collapse, or an escalation where he doubles down on extreme tactics and radicalizes, risking legal or health consequenceslooksmax.orglooksmax.org.


In either case, the consensus is that Sturmey’s current path is unsustainable. The forum analysis concludes a likely “collapse within 2–3 years” as debt, isolation and disillusionment catch up with himlooksmax.orglooksmax.org. Even its “best case” (an awakening prompted by rock bottom) would require him to abandon his persona – something he has shown no genuine readiness to do.


In summary, 1STMAN’s public history shows a man with deep insecurity who has constructed an elaborate persona to defend against pain. Key events (hair loss in his 20s, father’s death in 2021, the Memeulous mockery at 30) appear to have intensified his isolation and triggered stronger defenses. Analysts like Walsh depict a pattern of narcissistic grandiosity and projection concealing profound shame and lonelinesslooksmax.orglooksmax.org. His coping mechanisms (obsessive self-improvement, selling dubious programs) provide temporary relief but ultimately feed the downward spiral. Unless Sturmey acknowledges reality and receives help, observers believe his trajectory will only worsen – a cautionary case of ego collapse in the social‑media agelooksmax.orglooksmax.org.


Sources: Public records (blogs, LinkedIn, 1STMAN website) and analyses by community observers. For example, a forum analysis by Seth Walsh (looksmax.org, 2025) and others document these traits and events in detaillooksmax.orglooksmax.orglooksmax.orglooksmax.org. Behavioral patterns are drawn from Sturmey’s own statements (e.g. on YouTube and social media) and commentary by critics on Reddit and men’s forumslooksmax.orgreddit.com. All speculative inferences are attributed to these sources.
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
  • Woah
Reactions: Jonas2k7, Depresso and piec
Current signal
– Audience isn’t buying the “high-value” fantasy; top comments call him lonely or ask “where the b*tches at?”
– He replies with unverifiable claims (“girl off-camera”) and jokey threats (“internet breaks if I pan left”), classic narcissistic denial/deflection.
– Engagement ≈ ridicule, not admiration. Momentum points down.


Probable arc


Age bandLikely realityKey drivers
30-39 (now → 2032)Inheritance + course/coaching trickle keep lights on. Audience shrinks; negative sentiment dominates. Escalates hype (“New Jason Statham”) and pay-wall schemes (Granada house subs). Frequent platform bans/strikes possible. Intermittent depressive crashes.Narcissistic injury from aging, baldness, financial strain. Doubling-down defence loop.
40-49 (2032-2042)Revenue dries; refinance or liquidate family assets. Health declines (stress, PED use, joint damage). Reputation = “washed-up fake guru.” May pivot to fringe ideology or vanish into a tiny echo-chamber Telegram group. Risk of minor fraud charges if refund disputes accumulate. Social circle ≈ zero.Lost novelty, algorithmic irrelevance, legal pressure, cumulative shame.
50-59 (2042-2052)Two realistic endpoints: 1) Reclusion in low-cost region, living off remnant capital, sporadic bitter uploads; or 2) Quiet identity change, low-wage/behind-the-scenes job, internet past scrubbed. Chronic health issues likely; romantic life minimal. Genuine personal growth unlikely without external intervention, which he rejects.No income engine, aging body, irreversible brand toxicity.

Bottom line
Without a total break from the persona, trajectory is steady erosion: dwindling money, shrinking audience, deepening isolation, worsening mental and physical health.
 
Last edited:
EXTRMELY IMPORTANT PLEASE READ
1 What happened

LayerChain of eventsPsychological consequence
Early 20s : body + identity shockRapid male-pattern baldness, mediocre looks, collapse of hedge-fund trainee role.Narcissistic injury → baseline insecurity (“I’m nothing without status”).
Mid-20s : substitute identityBuilds the 1STMAN persona: gym, supplements, luxury props, “male-advantage” rhetoric. Gains minor YouTube traction; algorithms reward extremity.External validation replaces internal cohesion – classic compensatory narcissism.
2021 : father’s death + inheritanceLoses primary attachment figure and financial safety net merges with persona (he must now perform the wealth).Unresolved grief, guilt over dependency → stronger denial (“self-made”).
2022 : Memeulous public ridicule, age-30 milestoneGlobal humiliation reinforces fear of being ordinary; admits suicidal ideation.Ego splits: grandiose false-selfashamed true-self. To keep the split sealed he intensifies the act.
2023-24 : revenue stall, “1M-House” flopReal cashflow far below lifestyle costs; community queries deleted.Cognitive dissonance escalates; paranoia toward critics; reality-testing erodes.
2025 : Granada isolation short (“New Jason Statham”)Lives alone, staging cinematic shorts in an empty house, claiming hidden girlfriend. Comment section ≈ public mirror of his loneliness.Delusional coping: micro-lies (“girl off-camera”) become daily armour; any challenge triggers sarcastic fantasy replies.
Core pathology
  • Pathological narcissism (overt-covert cycle). Ego is a shell around shame; must inflate or implode.
  • Addiction to algorithmic dopamine. Short-form metrics replace genuine attachment → social atrophy.
  • Erotic deprivation. Zero secure intimacy; sexuality discussed only as conquest numbers → reinforces emptiness.
  • Reality-testing decay. Echo-chamber plus sunk-cost keeps him from admitting failure; micro-delusions protect ego.
  • Low affect tolerance. No tools for grief, boredom, or humiliation → he reaches for grandiosity or rage.

2 Realistic life-course forecast (assuming no intervention)
AgeLikely stateMechanism
30-34Intermittent “high-value” uploads, mounting comment hostility, Patreon/Skool churn. Quiet loans against inheritance. Occasional impulsive relocation for fresh backdrop.Narcissistic supply hunt + financial bleed.
35-39Audience <10 k, revenue <$2 k/mo. Health issues (joint pain, TRT side-effects). Possible minor fraud litigation/refund claims. Increased alcohol or benzo use.Diminishing returns → desperation loop.
40-49Withdrawal phase. Either: (A) fringe-ideology pivot (manosphere extremist, crypto-cult) or (B) vanish to low-cost country, living off remainder of estate. Social circle ≈ zero. Chronic depression.Identity foreclosure; no adaptive coping acquired.
50-59Outcome bifurcation: lonely recluse with medical comorbidities or late therapeutic break-through after health crisis forces contact with professionals. Odds favour the former without external pull.Entropy of untreated personality disorder.

3 Why this path is so sticky
  1. Algorithmic positive-feedback – Platforms reward extremes; each like extends the delusion that the act is working.
  2. Sunk-cost fallacy – Ten years invested in a persona; admitting failure = psychic death.
  3. Shame-avoidant cognition – Any evidence contradicting grandiosity is either deleted, mocked, or reframed as “haters.”
  4. Lack of corrective relationships – No intimate partner or stable friend to reality-check him. Isolation lets pathology metastasize.

4 Intervention levers (theoretical)
LeverRationaleFeasibility
Forced transparency (e.g., demonetization, legal action)Collapses the fantasy economy, forcing contact with reality.Medium; depends on platform policy or claimant momentum.
Human anchor (mentor, therapist, intimate partner with boundaries)Provides mirroring + gradual shame exposure in a safe frame.Low; he distrusts equals, idealizes/devalues helpers.
Structured meaning outside metrics (trade, in-person coaching, charity)Builds self-worth through observable, offline competence.Medium-low; requires stepping away from camera.
Pharmacological + CBT for narcissistic depressionAddresses mood dysregulation and cognitive rigidity.Only after rock-bottom; ego now blocks it.

5 Lessons for everyone else
  1. Do not outsource self-worth to algorithms. Metrics are narcotics; use them as tools, not mirrors.
  2. Grieve losses, don’t mask them. Hair, status, relationships—unprocessed grief mutates into narcissistic rage.
  3. Maintain reality-testing friendships. Regular face-to-face peers prevent echo-chamber distortions.
  4. Tie identity to process, not persona. Skills learned and people served outlast image games.
  5. Monitor “success inflation.” When each milestone feels emptier, that’s a signal to recalibrate purpose, not double dose.

Condensed outlook​

If nothing disrupts the cycle, 1STMAN ages into an isolated, cash-strapped, physically deteriorating man clinging to a fantasy brand no one believes. The tragedy isn’t the grift; it’s the untreated shame addiction that made the grift necessary in the first place.
 
Last edited:

1STMAN (Kris-Paul Sturmey): Psychological Profile and Downward Spiral​


Background and Persona​


Kris-Paul Sturmey (online alias “1STMAN”) is a London-based men’s lifestyle influencer who launched the 1STMAN brand (blog/YouTube) in his mid-20s. In a 2017 interview, a 25‑year‑old Sturmey described himself as an “entrepreneur and director” creating self‑improvement content for menthemanblueprint.comthemanblueprint.com. The 1STMAN website today markets a testosterone‑boosting supplement (“Male Advantage”) and a weekly membership community on Skool1st-man.com. On camera, he projects a hyper‑masculine “high value” persona – ostentatiously referencing luxury cars, workout routines, and alpha male rhetoric. Critics note that this image has evolved into a performance: forum analysts argue that 1STMAN’s constant bravado (e.g. boasting of “thousands” of female conquests) serves as “compensatory grandiosity” to mask deep insecuritylooksmax.org. In sum, the official narrative is self‑improvement and success, but outside observers see a fragile persona built on unverified claims.


Key Life Events and Triggers (Timeline)​


  • Mid‑20s (≈2018) – Sturmey began experiencing significant hair loss (male‑pattern baldness). Early content focused on “mewing” (jaw exercises) and hair remedies. According to analysts, losing his hair in his mid‑20s was a narcissistic injury: he initially blamed temporary causes (“telogen effluvium”) but eventually realized his genes were the causelooksmax.org. This loss of a key masculinity symbol purportedly “shattered his identity,” triggering overcompensation through deepening his voice, aggressive posture and misogynistic talklooksmax.orglooksmax.org.
  • Mid‑20s – Around the same period, Sturmey either left or lost his (reported) finance career. Online evidence (a Medium author page and forum claims) suggests he had worked in hedge funds or private equitylooksmax.orgmedium.com. Analysts note that by age 26 he was “unemployed and just using inheritance” despite claiming a “top finance job”looksmax.org. This abrupt career collapse forced him to fund his lifestyle through online ventures (renting luxury cars for videos, selling courses, etc.).
  • 2021 (Age ~28) – Sturmey’s father died, leaving an inheritance. Walsh’s analysis (and forum discussion) indicates he inherited significant money but refused to admit it, instead portraying himself as “self‑made”looksmax.orglooksmax.org. This unresolved “parenteral legacy trauma” is thought to underlie both guilt and denial: he publicly belittles others’ inherited wealth while privately depending on itlooksmax.org. His digital persona became more lavish around this time (green‑screen penthouse shots, claims of 100K+ monthly revenue)looksmax.orglooksmax.org, arguably to prove his success to a father he can no longer impress.
  • August 2022 (30th Birthday) – A major inflection point occurred just before Sturmey’s 30th birthday when a popular YouTuber (“Memeulous”) released a mocking critique of 1STMAN. According to forum reports, Sturmey reacted strongly: one commentator noted he was “crying over a Memeulous vid on his 30th birthday,” even emailing Memeulous about itlooksmax.org. He himself ominously said that “a weaker man would commit suicide over this” critiquelooksmax.org. Walsh and others consider this humiliation a tipping point: turning 30 (and being bald) made Sturmey feel “it’s pretty much over” for his dreamslooksmax.orglooksmax.org. Observers see the Memeulous video as accelerating his despair and driving him deeper into delusional defenses.
  • 2023–2024 – In the aftermath, Sturmey doubled down on monetization schemes. He launched a paid “Skool” coaching membership and a flagship program called “1M House” (promising access to luxury international homes). Independent investigators quickly called “1M House” a scam: subscribers paid thousands, but there were no actual houses behind the offerreddit.comreddit.com. Critics noted Sturmey deleted or disabled all negative comments on these sales pitchesreddit.comreddit.com. Meanwhile he continued producing content: some collaborations (e.g. with influencer Rob Lipsett) kept him in the loop, but others (and his own audience) increasingly viewed him as a cautionary case study. In mid‑2024, influential men’s forums (looksmax.org) began detailed exposés of his trajectory, predicting collapselooksmax.orglooksmax.org.

Financial and Professional Status​


Sturmey’s actual finances appear precarious. The 1STMAN brand sells supplements, apparel and courses1st-man.com, but there is little evidence these generate substantial profit. Forum analysts assert he is effectively unemployed and living off inheritancelooksmax.orglooksmax.org. For example, one forum member bluntly states that at age ~35 he’s “mid 30s, completely unemployed, renting an apartment off the money from his Dad’s will”looksmax.org. Walsh echoes this view: he writes that Sturmey’s income comes from family money while claiming false high earningslooksmax.orglooksmax.org. Meanwhile, his public ventures raise red flags. The “1M House” program – charging ~$3,000 for access to non‑existent housing – was labeled “basically a timeshare but way overpriced” by a concerned YouTuberreddit.comreddit.com. All negative questions about this project were reportedly deleted from his channelsreddit.comreddit.com. In short, observers believe Sturmey’s financial situation is likely defined by debt and dwindling assets, rather than sustainable business successlooksmax.orglooksmax.org.


Social Relationships and Isolation​


There are no publicly known romantic relationships in Sturmey’s life. Forum analysts conclude he is almost certainly single and likely a virgin, despite his boasts. As Walsh notes, Sturmey’s claims of huge numbers of partners are “textbook overcompensation” for lonelinesslooksmax.org. His rhetoric about women is exceptionally hostile or transactional: framing himself as the one who “rejects” women allows him to project his fear of rejection and vulnerabilitylooksmax.org. Likewise, he cultivates few friends. One commentary observes that “women avoid him due to his instability; male peers see him as a joke”looksmax.org. In other words, his arrogance and transactional view of relationships repel genuine connection, creating a feedback loop: “arrogance... repels genuine connection, trapping him in a cycle of loneliness → grandiosity → further isolation”looksmax.org. This social isolation feeds into his persona – he increasingly uses his audience as entertainment (or a self‑affirming “case study”) rather than seeking real companionshiplooksmax.orglooksmax.org.


Defense Mechanisms and Personality Traits​


  • Narcissistic Compensation: Sturmey shows classic narcissistic defense. He inflates achievements and desirability to ward off shame. For example, he boasts of “thousands” of female conquests despite no evidence; analysts say this is a fantasy masking the opposite realitylooksmax.org. His moral code is rigidly performance‑based: he must appear dominant, successful and unemotional. When confronted, he deploys reaction formation – expressing contempt or hatred (for women, for “haters,” etc.) that is interpreted as a defense against his own vulnerability. For instance, his lengthy rants about “prostitutes” in Barcelona are seen not as genuine outrage but as projection of self-loathing: he hates that he must pay for intimacy he secretly cannot attain, so he blames the womenlooksmax.org.
  • Denial and Splitting: He habitually denies reality that threatens his ego. Walsh notes he persisted in claiming he was “self‑made” even after inheriting wealth, a denial of dependencylooksmax.orglooksmax.org. He also splits people into “high value” vs. “losers,” absolving himself of empathy. This black‑and‑white thinking lets him avoid acknowledging any weakness. Even about age, his self-talk oscillates wildly: in one video he raves about being a 20s boss-man, in another he frets obsessively about turning 30. His commentators see this as a fragmented identity and evidence he must dissociate when faced with dissonancelooksmax.org.
  • Projection: Sturmey projects many of his feelings onto others. He repeatedly accuses others of the very things he fears. For example, he often claims that society (or other men) are weak/unclean, mirroring his own fear of inadequacylooksmax.orglooksmax.org. Forum analysts especially note that he projects self-doubt onto women: his misogyny is viewed as a shield for anxiety about intimacylooksmax.org.
  • Compulsive Grandiosity: Maintaining a grandiose image consumes him. He constantly seeks external validation (views, subscriptions, paid programs) to shore up his self-worth. Walsh describes this as an “external validation trap,” noting that Sturmey ties his entire identity to sex, money and statuslooksmax.orglooksmax.org. This leaves him on shaky ground: any hit to his image (negative comments, age reality, financial loss) threatens severe emotional collapse.
  • Intellectual Rigidity / Possible Deficits: Critics often remark that Sturmey seems naïve or cognitively rigid. One forum post bluntly states, “I don’t think he’s particularly intelligent tbh”looksmax.org. His repeated mistakes – believing his own hype, ignoring obvious business flaws, failing to see contradictions – suggest deficits in insight. He has not adjusted his strategy despite failing to deliver on promises (e.g. no houses for “1M House”), indicating poor self-reflection. His inability to truthfully assess himself (e.g. admitting if he were actually wealthy or successful) also shows low cognitive/emotional awareness.
  • Emotional Inauthenticity: Sturmey rarely appears emotionally genuine. His videos and posts are scripted and performative. Walsh’s analysis concludes he is a “deeply lonely individual trapped in a self-created prison of lies”looksmax.org. He rarely expresses natural vulnerability; instead he switches between bravado and rage. Maintaining this façade reportedly leaves him “emotionally bankrupt,” draining him so he eventually “goes numb” or has anger outburstslooksmax.org. This chronic inauthenticity means he lacks real empathy or vulnerability; he cannot form trust and, paradoxically, becomes more isolated.

Coping with Aging and Appearance​


Sturmey’s coping style revolves around extreme “looksmaxxing.” Losing his hair and youth triggered an identity crisis, and he responded by trying to physically optimize himself. He has produced tutorials on posture, grooming, fitness, and runs a “Male Advantage” supplement line1st-man.com. These efforts can be seen as ritualistic attempts to reclaim lost youth. However, observers view them as defensive: Walsh notes that his “hypermasculine” transformation (deep voice, gym obsession, scolding tone) is essentially a reaction-formation against his fear of weaknesslooksmax.orglooksmax.org. Instead of accepting aging, he denies reality through these obsessions. As he himself put it, he started training his jaw with mewing exercises when hair loss beganlooksmax.org. In sum, his physical self-improvement is less about wellness and more about symbolically battling the passage of time and proving to himself (and others) that he remains a “high-value” man.


Current Phase: Downward Spiral​


All these factors have converged into what commentators describe as a downward psychological spiral. Forums predict that 1STMAN’s current trajectory leads to burnout or breakdown. As Walsh warns, once his scams collapse or he’s exposed, the expected outcome is a mental health crisis (depression, suicidal ideation) or total withdrawal from his online lifelooksmax.org. Indeed, his own statements – like the “suicide” comment after the Memeulous video – suggest suicidal thoughts lurk beneath his bravadolooksmax.org. Analysts outline two bleak scenarios: an implosion where failure and public humiliation trigger collapse, or an escalation where he doubles down on extreme tactics and radicalizes, risking legal or health consequenceslooksmax.orglooksmax.org.


In either case, the consensus is that Sturmey’s current path is unsustainable. The forum analysis concludes a likely “collapse within 2–3 years” as debt, isolation and disillusionment catch up with himlooksmax.orglooksmax.org. Even its “best case” (an awakening prompted by rock bottom) would require him to abandon his persona – something he has shown no genuine readiness to do.


In summary, 1STMAN’s public history shows a man with deep insecurity who has constructed an elaborate persona to defend against pain. Key events (hair loss in his 20s, father’s death in 2021, the Memeulous mockery at 30) appear to have intensified his isolation and triggered stronger defenses. Analysts like Walsh depict a pattern of narcissistic grandiosity and projection concealing profound shame and lonelinesslooksmax.orglooksmax.org. His coping mechanisms (obsessive self-improvement, selling dubious programs) provide temporary relief but ultimately feed the downward spiral. Unless Sturmey acknowledges reality and receives help, observers believe his trajectory will only worsen – a cautionary case of ego collapse in the social‑media agelooksmax.orglooksmax.org.


Sources: Public records (blogs, LinkedIn, 1STMAN website) and analyses by community observers. For example, a forum analysis by Seth Walsh (looksmax.org, 2025) and others document these traits and events in detaillooksmax.orglooksmax.orglooksmax.orglooksmax.org. Behavioral patterns are drawn from Sturmey’s own statements (e.g. on YouTube and social media) and commentary by critics on Reddit and men’s forumslooksmax.orgreddit.com. All speculative inferences are attributed to these sources.
gpt?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Seth Walsh

1STMAN (Kris-Paul Sturmey): Psychological Profile and Downward Spiral​


Background and Persona​


Kris-Paul Sturmey (online alias “1STMAN”) is a London-based men’s lifestyle influencer who launched the 1STMAN brand (blog/YouTube) in his mid-20s. In a 2017 interview, a 25‑year‑old Sturmey described himself as an “entrepreneur and director” creating self‑improvement content for menthemanblueprint.comthemanblueprint.com. The 1STMAN website today markets a testosterone‑boosting supplement (“Male Advantage”) and a weekly membership community on Skool1st-man.com. On camera, he projects a hyper‑masculine “high value” persona – ostentatiously referencing luxury cars, workout routines, and alpha male rhetoric. Critics note that this image has evolved into a performance: forum analysts argue that 1STMAN’s constant bravado (e.g. boasting of “thousands” of female conquests) serves as “compensatory grandiosity” to mask deep insecuritylooksmax.org. In sum, the official narrative is self‑improvement and success, but outside observers see a fragile persona built on unverified claims.


Key Life Events and Triggers (Timeline)​


  • Mid‑20s (≈2018) – Sturmey began experiencing significant hair loss (male‑pattern baldness). Early content focused on “mewing” (jaw exercises) and hair remedies. According to analysts, losing his hair in his mid‑20s was a narcissistic injury: he initially blamed temporary causes (“telogen effluvium”) but eventually realized his genes were the causelooksmax.org. This loss of a key masculinity symbol purportedly “shattered his identity,” triggering overcompensation through deepening his voice, aggressive posture and misogynistic talklooksmax.orglooksmax.org.
  • Mid‑20s – Around the same period, Sturmey either left or lost his (reported) finance career. Online evidence (a Medium author page and forum claims) suggests he had worked in hedge funds or private equitylooksmax.orgmedium.com. Analysts note that by age 26 he was “unemployed and just using inheritance” despite claiming a “top finance job”looksmax.org. This abrupt career collapse forced him to fund his lifestyle through online ventures (renting luxury cars for videos, selling courses, etc.).
  • 2021 (Age ~28) – Sturmey’s father died, leaving an inheritance. Walsh’s analysis (and forum discussion) indicates he inherited significant money but refused to admit it, instead portraying himself as “self‑made”looksmax.orglooksmax.org. This unresolved “parenteral legacy trauma” is thought to underlie both guilt and denial: he publicly belittles others’ inherited wealth while privately depending on itlooksmax.org. His digital persona became more lavish around this time (green‑screen penthouse shots, claims of 100K+ monthly revenue)looksmax.orglooksmax.org, arguably to prove his success to a father he can no longer impress.
  • August 2022 (30th Birthday) – A major inflection point occurred just before Sturmey’s 30th birthday when a popular YouTuber (“Memeulous”) released a mocking critique of 1STMAN. According to forum reports, Sturmey reacted strongly: one commentator noted he was “crying over a Memeulous vid on his 30th birthday,” even emailing Memeulous about itlooksmax.org. He himself ominously said that “a weaker man would commit suicide over this” critiquelooksmax.org. Walsh and others consider this humiliation a tipping point: turning 30 (and being bald) made Sturmey feel “it’s pretty much over” for his dreamslooksmax.orglooksmax.org. Observers see the Memeulous video as accelerating his despair and driving him deeper into delusional defenses.
  • 2023–2024 – In the aftermath, Sturmey doubled down on monetization schemes. He launched a paid “Skool” coaching membership and a flagship program called “1M House” (promising access to luxury international homes). Independent investigators quickly called “1M House” a scam: subscribers paid thousands, but there were no actual houses behind the offerreddit.comreddit.com. Critics noted Sturmey deleted or disabled all negative comments on these sales pitchesreddit.comreddit.com. Meanwhile he continued producing content: some collaborations (e.g. with influencer Rob Lipsett) kept him in the loop, but others (and his own audience) increasingly viewed him as a cautionary case study. In mid‑2024, influential men’s forums (looksmax.org) began detailed exposés of his trajectory, predicting collapselooksmax.orglooksmax.org.

Financial and Professional Status​


Sturmey’s actual finances appear precarious. The 1STMAN brand sells supplements, apparel and courses1st-man.com, but there is little evidence these generate substantial profit. Forum analysts assert he is effectively unemployed and living off inheritancelooksmax.orglooksmax.org. For example, one forum member bluntly states that at age ~35 he’s “mid 30s, completely unemployed, renting an apartment off the money from his Dad’s will”looksmax.org. Walsh echoes this view: he writes that Sturmey’s income comes from family money while claiming false high earningslooksmax.orglooksmax.org. Meanwhile, his public ventures raise red flags. The “1M House” program – charging ~$3,000 for access to non‑existent housing – was labeled “basically a timeshare but way overpriced” by a concerned YouTuberreddit.comreddit.com. All negative questions about this project were reportedly deleted from his channelsreddit.comreddit.com. In short, observers believe Sturmey’s financial situation is likely defined by debt and dwindling assets, rather than sustainable business successlooksmax.orglooksmax.org.


Social Relationships and Isolation​


There are no publicly known romantic relationships in Sturmey’s life. Forum analysts conclude he is almost certainly single and likely a virgin, despite his boasts. As Walsh notes, Sturmey’s claims of huge numbers of partners are “textbook overcompensation” for lonelinesslooksmax.org. His rhetoric about women is exceptionally hostile or transactional: framing himself as the one who “rejects” women allows him to project his fear of rejection and vulnerabilitylooksmax.org. Likewise, he cultivates few friends. One commentary observes that “women avoid him due to his instability; male peers see him as a joke”looksmax.org. In other words, his arrogance and transactional view of relationships repel genuine connection, creating a feedback loop: “arrogance... repels genuine connection, trapping him in a cycle of loneliness → grandiosity → further isolation”looksmax.org. This social isolation feeds into his persona – he increasingly uses his audience as entertainment (or a self‑affirming “case study”) rather than seeking real companionshiplooksmax.orglooksmax.org.


Defense Mechanisms and Personality Traits​


  • Narcissistic Compensation: Sturmey shows classic narcissistic defense. He inflates achievements and desirability to ward off shame. For example, he boasts of “thousands” of female conquests despite no evidence; analysts say this is a fantasy masking the opposite realitylooksmax.org. His moral code is rigidly performance‑based: he must appear dominant, successful and unemotional. When confronted, he deploys reaction formation – expressing contempt or hatred (for women, for “haters,” etc.) that is interpreted as a defense against his own vulnerability. For instance, his lengthy rants about “prostitutes” in Barcelona are seen not as genuine outrage but as projection of self-loathing: he hates that he must pay for intimacy he secretly cannot attain, so he blames the womenlooksmax.org.
  • Denial and Splitting: He habitually denies reality that threatens his ego. Walsh notes he persisted in claiming he was “self‑made” even after inheriting wealth, a denial of dependencylooksmax.orglooksmax.org. He also splits people into “high value” vs. “losers,” absolving himself of empathy. This black‑and‑white thinking lets him avoid acknowledging any weakness. Even about age, his self-talk oscillates wildly: in one video he raves about being a 20s boss-man, in another he frets obsessively about turning 30. His commentators see this as a fragmented identity and evidence he must dissociate when faced with dissonancelooksmax.org.
  • Projection: Sturmey projects many of his feelings onto others. He repeatedly accuses others of the very things he fears. For example, he often claims that society (or other men) are weak/unclean, mirroring his own fear of inadequacylooksmax.orglooksmax.org. Forum analysts especially note that he projects self-doubt onto women: his misogyny is viewed as a shield for anxiety about intimacylooksmax.org.
  • Compulsive Grandiosity: Maintaining a grandiose image consumes him. He constantly seeks external validation (views, subscriptions, paid programs) to shore up his self-worth. Walsh describes this as an “external validation trap,” noting that Sturmey ties his entire identity to sex, money and statuslooksmax.orglooksmax.org. This leaves him on shaky ground: any hit to his image (negative comments, age reality, financial loss) threatens severe emotional collapse.
  • Intellectual Rigidity / Possible Deficits: Critics often remark that Sturmey seems naïve or cognitively rigid. One forum post bluntly states, “I don’t think he’s particularly intelligent tbh”looksmax.org. His repeated mistakes – believing his own hype, ignoring obvious business flaws, failing to see contradictions – suggest deficits in insight. He has not adjusted his strategy despite failing to deliver on promises (e.g. no houses for “1M House”), indicating poor self-reflection. His inability to truthfully assess himself (e.g. admitting if he were actually wealthy or successful) also shows low cognitive/emotional awareness.
  • Emotional Inauthenticity: Sturmey rarely appears emotionally genuine. His videos and posts are scripted and performative. Walsh’s analysis concludes he is a “deeply lonely individual trapped in a self-created prison of lies”looksmax.org. He rarely expresses natural vulnerability; instead he switches between bravado and rage. Maintaining this façade reportedly leaves him “emotionally bankrupt,” draining him so he eventually “goes numb” or has anger outburstslooksmax.org. This chronic inauthenticity means he lacks real empathy or vulnerability; he cannot form trust and, paradoxically, becomes more isolated.

Coping with Aging and Appearance​


Sturmey’s coping style revolves around extreme “looksmaxxing.” Losing his hair and youth triggered an identity crisis, and he responded by trying to physically optimize himself. He has produced tutorials on posture, grooming, fitness, and runs a “Male Advantage” supplement line1st-man.com. These efforts can be seen as ritualistic attempts to reclaim lost youth. However, observers view them as defensive: Walsh notes that his “hypermasculine” transformation (deep voice, gym obsession, scolding tone) is essentially a reaction-formation against his fear of weaknesslooksmax.orglooksmax.org. Instead of accepting aging, he denies reality through these obsessions. As he himself put it, he started training his jaw with mewing exercises when hair loss beganlooksmax.org. In sum, his physical self-improvement is less about wellness and more about symbolically battling the passage of time and proving to himself (and others) that he remains a “high-value” man.


Current Phase: Downward Spiral​


All these factors have converged into what commentators describe as a downward psychological spiral. Forums predict that 1STMAN’s current trajectory leads to burnout or breakdown. As Walsh warns, once his scams collapse or he’s exposed, the expected outcome is a mental health crisis (depression, suicidal ideation) or total withdrawal from his online lifelooksmax.org. Indeed, his own statements – like the “suicide” comment after the Memeulous video – suggest suicidal thoughts lurk beneath his bravadolooksmax.org. Analysts outline two bleak scenarios: an implosion where failure and public humiliation trigger collapse, or an escalation where he doubles down on extreme tactics and radicalizes, risking legal or health consequenceslooksmax.orglooksmax.org.


In either case, the consensus is that Sturmey’s current path is unsustainable. The forum analysis concludes a likely “collapse within 2–3 years” as debt, isolation and disillusionment catch up with himlooksmax.orglooksmax.org. Even its “best case” (an awakening prompted by rock bottom) would require him to abandon his persona – something he has shown no genuine readiness to do.


In summary, 1STMAN’s public history shows a man with deep insecurity who has constructed an elaborate persona to defend against pain. Key events (hair loss in his 20s, father’s death in 2021, the Memeulous mockery at 30) appear to have intensified his isolation and triggered stronger defenses. Analysts like Walsh depict a pattern of narcissistic grandiosity and projection concealing profound shame and lonelinesslooksmax.orglooksmax.org. His coping mechanisms (obsessive self-improvement, selling dubious programs) provide temporary relief but ultimately feed the downward spiral. Unless Sturmey acknowledges reality and receives help, observers believe his trajectory will only worsen – a cautionary case of ego collapse in the social‑media agelooksmax.orglooksmax.org.


Sources: Public records (blogs, LinkedIn, 1STMAN website) and analyses by community observers. For example, a forum analysis by Seth Walsh (looksmax.org, 2025) and others document these traits and events in detaillooksmax.orglooksmax.orglooksmax.orglooksmax.org. Behavioral patterns are drawn from Sturmey’s own statements (e.g. on YouTube and social media) and commentary by critics on Reddit and men’s forumslooksmax.orgreddit.com. All speculative inferences are attributed to these sources.
I am 18 years old I turned like in March :lasereyes: do I have time to fully looksmax and not end up like this?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Seth Walsh
idk wtf is this just leeching the BOTB reacts
 
  • Woah
Reactions: Seth Walsh
OpenAI Deep Research.

It managed to quote the forum and a lot of my posts. (Never knew I've been posting about him since like 2022)
 
  • +1
Reactions: Depresso
I am 18 years old I turned like in March :lasereyes: do I have time to fully looksmax and not end up like this?
idk. just dont be delusional with a huge ego and you wont end up like him. looksmaxxing has nothing to do with it.
 
Don't understand what you're saying mate :)
when you gonna become famous and your thread will be on "Best of the best" i will get reactions on my reply because i'm one of the first repliers
 
when you gonna become famous and your thread will be on "Best of the best" i will get reactions on my reply because i'm one of the first repliers
High IQ.

I have like 1 or 2 threads on BOTB I think.

My style of obsessive threads aren't fit for BOTB, I doubt I will ever have one on there again, and I don't care too:)
 
  • Woah
Reactions: Serial Coomer

Similar threads

JeanneDArcAlter
Discussion JeanneDArcAlter
Replies
27
Views
479
JeanneDArcAlter
JeanneDArcAlter
Seth Walsh
Replies
27
Views
429
Seth Walsh
Seth Walsh
disillusioned
Replies
4
Views
166
160cmcurry
160cmcurry
Seth Walsh
Replies
16
Views
550
Yliaster
Yliaster

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top