D
Deleted member 51358
broken but not destroyed
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2023
- Posts
- 32,903
- Reputation
- 58,826
Took a physics test and got a 65% but that curved to a 93% jfl the average person got like a 40% on the test
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
0Took a physics test and got a 65% but that curved to a 93% jfl the average person got like a 40% on the test
He knew he couldn’t get pussy and chose to be a loser. He chose to be a loser. He embraced itNo wonder Newton preferred physics over woman
It's funny how Newton and Tesla would be called incel if they were alive nowHe knew he couldn’t get pussy and chose to be a loser. He chose to be a loser. He embraced it

They would’ve roped as soon as they heard the word “ mogging”It's funny how Newton and Tesla would be called incel if they were alive now![]()
The job market for a lot of CS graduates has been tough lately. The entry jobs are saturated, but I imagine it's mostly the most common jobs like software engineering, and not niches in cybersecurity. This could be because a niche like cybersecurity would be hard to get in with solely a bachelors.get into computer science
Why didn't you ask for a regrade: "Hello, there's a mistake here, I think I deserve a better grade, I love physics, I think it's pretty obvious...".Took a physics test and got a 65% but that curved to a 93% jfl the average person got like a 40% on the test
Will be somewhat easier for a fresher if he is from a good college and got a good cgpaThe job market for a lot of CS graduates has been tough lately. The entry jobs are saturated, but I imagine it's mostly the most common jobs like software engineering, and not niches in cybersecurity. This could be because a niche like cybersecurity would be hard to get in with solely a bachelors.
the market is ever evolving especially as we step into spatial computing. as of right now imo it’s the most fruitful degree out of any. as is biology. the sciences as a whole.The job market for a lot of CS graduates has been tough lately. The entry jobs are saturated, but I imagine it's mostly the most common jobs like software engineering, and not niches in cybersecurity. This could be because a niche like cybersecurity would be hard to get in with solely a bachelors.
For all I know, some possible theories for quantum gravity have become more mathematically robust but there's a lack of experimental guidance so they remain unproven theories at best.Has anyone made any notable progress to reconcile quantum physics and general relativity under a unified theory?
Tesla predicted the state of society todayIt's funny how Newton and Tesla would be called incel if they were alive now![]()
My physics teach isn’t a foid(obviously) and I’m fine with my 93%Why didn't you ask for a regrade: "Hello, there's a mistake here, I think I deserve a better grade, I love physics, I think it's pretty obvious...".
View attachment 2738705
Nope it’s just conjecture it seems physics in general hasn’t seen many big leaps forwards were stagnant man. We need another Einstein or Planck or HeisenbergHas anyone made any notable progress to reconcile quantum physics and general relativity under a unified theory?
Good advice tbh but I love physics manget into computer science
Damn that’s sad, imagine the world if we had this shit figured outNope it’s just conjecture it seems physics in general hasn’t seen many big leaps forwards were stagnant man. We need another Einstein or Planck or Heisenberg
If only it were that simple. Einstein, Planck, and Heisenberg accelerated breakthroughs because their theoretical leaps solved existing experimental inconsistencies, even if direct proof took time; today's stagnation lies in the scale of experiments needed, not a lack of theoretical progress.Nope it’s just conjecture it seems physics in general hasn’t seen many big leaps forwards were stagnant man. We need another Einstein or Planck or Heisenberg
Damn do you think that it will be like how the idea of quanta(atoms) has existed for thousands of years but has only been proven to exist relatively recently in timeIf only it were that simple. Einstein, Planck, and Heisenberg accelerated breakthroughs because their theoretical leaps solved existing experimental inconsistencies, even if direct proof took time; today's stagnation lies in the scale of experiments needed, not a lack of theoretical progress.
The primary reason it's hard to prove theories of quantum gravity experimentally is that the effects of quantum gravity are far too weak and occur at energy scales vastly beyond our current technological capabilities.