Piers Morgan tries to shame Nick Fuentes for being a virgin, but gets exposed for being a cuck himself

Gargantuan

Gargantuan

Sub-Admin
Staff
Joined
Mar 31, 2020
Posts
15,470
Reputation
50,883
Context:

Piers Morgan’s interrogation ritual is the perfect example of NPC programming: it’s never about truth, it’s about enforcing conformity through shame.

They always run the same little ritual:
– spot the dissident
– throw a cheap shame jab
– then watch to see if you flinch

Meanwhile, his own wife has been publicly posting things like this for years :forcedsmile:
1765296058105
1765296067744
1765296083869
1765296095219
1765296102608
1765296110678
1765296118713
1765296129917


Never let system NPCs shame you out of your nature.
Shame is the tool of people who have nothing else left: no principle, no coherence, no inner life.
Your authenticity is the one thing they cannot counterfeit.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Woah
Reactions: HTNcutecel, WrothEnd, Yeagerist and 39 others
Man this is like the akash situation repeating again
 
  • +1
Reactions: mrdouchebag and Gargantuan
How the fuck is Fuentes a virgin at 27?

Someone that does shit like this:
1765297373166


Would fuck anything
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: rekcy23, owlofathena, Robert_ and 11 others
resentful subhuman
 
  • +1
Reactions: owlofathena, Robert_, HundredManSlayer and 2 others
I’d love it if he interviewed Clav
 
  • +1
Reactions: owlofathena, SomaliSub5, Sicilian Cyclops and 4 others
Context:
View attachment 4407371
Piers Morgan’s interrogation ritual is the perfect example of NPC programming: it’s never about truth, it’s about enforcing conformity through shame.

They always run the same little ritual:
– spot the dissident
– throw a cheap shame jab
– then watch to see if you flinch

Meanwhile, his own wife has been publicly posting things like this for years :forcedsmile:
View attachment 4407405View attachment 4407408View attachment 4407410View attachment 4407411View attachment 4407412View attachment 4407413View attachment 4407414View attachment 4407415

Never let system NPCs shame you out of your nature.
Shame is the tool of people who have nothing else left: no principle, no coherence, no inner life.
Your authenticity is the one thing they cannot counterfeit.
View attachment 4407440
the edits are cool to be honest. :love:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Finnishmogger, car12345, Soter and 2 others
Ok but none of that changes the fact that its hard to take his arguments seriously when he legit openly admits that his resentment toward women comes from his own negative personal experiences with them. It takes away any credibility of the points he tries to defend...
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gargantuan
i enjoy watching cucks escapades unfolding in public jfl at them
 
  • +1
Reactions: Robert_ and Gargantuan
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: SharpOrange, gymceltard, Gargantuan and 1 other person
IMG 0194

His wife NEEDS bbc
 
  • JFL
Reactions: owlofathena and Gargantuan
Context:
View attachment 4407371
Piers Morgan’s interrogation ritual is the perfect example of NPC programming: it’s never about truth, it’s about enforcing conformity through shame.

They always run the same little ritual:
– spot the dissident
– throw a cheap shame jab
– then watch to see if you flinch

Meanwhile, his own wife has been publicly posting things like this for years :forcedsmile:
View attachment 4407405View attachment 4407408View attachment 4407410View attachment 4407411View attachment 4407412View attachment 4407413View attachment 4407414View attachment 4407415

Never let system NPCs shame you out of your nature.
Shame is the tool of people who have nothing else left: no principle, no coherence, no inner life.
Your authenticity is the one thing they cannot counterfeit.
View attachment 4407440
271k
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gargantuan
Piers Morgan really has no right to say anything to anyone about relationships or sex.
 
  • +1
Reactions: WrothEnd, owlofathena, SomaliSub5 and 2 others
  • +1
Reactions: owlofathena, TechnoBoss and Gargantuan
Ok but none of that changes the fact that its hard to take his arguments seriously when he legit openly admits that his resentment toward women comes from his own negative personal experiences with them. It takes away any credibility of the points he tries to defend...
Credibility isn’t determined by the emotional origin of a belief but by the accuracy of the claim itself.
Dismissing someone’s stance because it came from personal experience is a psychological cope, not an argument.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: SomaliSub5, Finnishmogger, LiL 369 and 1 other person
OP never handed out a tampon to a local girl buddy in need nor even had one in his pocket on deck EVER. Dumb nigger needs to shut the fuckily snipple snap doodle up!
 
Context:
View attachment 4407371
Piers Morgan’s interrogation ritual is the perfect example of NPC programming: it’s never about truth, it’s about enforcing conformity through shame.

They always run the same little ritual:
– spot the dissident
– throw a cheap shame jab
– then watch to see if you flinch

Meanwhile, his own wife has been publicly posting things like this for years :forcedsmile:
View attachment 4407405View attachment 4407408View attachment 4407410View attachment 4407411View attachment 4407412View attachment 4407413View attachment 4407414View attachment 4407415

Never let system NPCs shame you out of your nature.
Shame is the tool of people who have nothing else left: no principle, no coherence, no inner life.
Your authenticity is the one thing they cannot counterfeit.
View attachment 4407440
nah he can't be a virgin i remember him giving blowjob to destiny someone even posted that video here :feelskek:
 
piers is so fucking annoying, i couldnt enjoy this interview.
i cant stand this guy whatsoever
 
  • +1
Reactions: owlofathena, Miami and Gargantuan
You know you're getting owned, pwnd, pwnt, and rekt when you resort to virgin shaming and gay accusations

I really enjoyed the interview from start to finish
 
  • +1
Reactions: WrothEnd, owlofathena and Gargantuan
Credibility isn’t determined by the emotional origin of a belief but by the accuracy of the claim itself.
Dismissing someone’s stance because it came from personal experience is a psychological cope, not an argument.
Its not even so much about his personal experiences. Its about the credibility of the person delivering the message. If the messenger isnt coherent or is biased in the points hes trying to make, he obviously loses credibility and the message loses value, thats whats happening here.

A simple example of this was maradona and his "anti drug campaign"

1765310985763


Edit: Thinking back, it is indeed about him admitting his own negative personal experiences that makes him lose credibility.
 
Last edited:
JS BE MR. SUDS THEORY
 
Its not even so much about his personal experiences. Its about the credibility of the person delivering the message. If the messenger isnt coherent or is biased in the points hes trying to make, he obviously loses credibility and the message loses value, thats whats happening here.

A simple example of this was maradona and his "anti drug campaign"

View attachment 4408114

Edit: Thinking back, it is indeed about him admitting his own negative personal experiences that makes him lose credibility.
It's only non-credible if there's an element of hypocrisy there. If you say drugs are bad and you use drugs, you lose credibility.

has bad experiences with drugs in the past -> comes to the conclusion that drugs are bad -> doesn't use drugs
has bad experiences with women in the past -> comes to the conclusion that women are bad -> doesn't fuck with women

its perfectly rational. That's why anti-drug campaigns use former drug users who got their lives together in their commercials all the time.
 
  • +1
Reactions: LiL 369 and Gargantuan
Its not even so much about his personal experiences. Its about the credibility of the person delivering the message. If the messenger isnt coherent or is biased in the points hes trying to make, he obviously loses credibility and the message loses value, thats whats happening here.

A simple example of this was maradona and his "anti drug campaign"

View attachment 4408114

Edit: Thinking back, it is indeed about him admitting his own negative personal experiences that makes him lose credibility.
You’re mixing up optics with truth.

A messenger can be biased, inconsistent, hypocritical, but none of that makes the underlying claim false.

Maradona (@Brazilec @Maradona69 :feelskek:) doing a campaign like that whilst being high himself doesn’t suddenly make cocaine healthy.
It only means he’s a hypocrite, not that his point is wrong.

Right now, you’re only talking about how it looks, not whether it’s true.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Brazilec and LiL 369
Worst interview ever, Piers made an absolute fool of himself tbh. Everyone in the comments is talking about how hard Nick schooled him :lul:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gargantuan
Damn, I was expecting to read some gibberish.
But OP came with the fucking receipts.

Piers Morgan is such a cuck. His wife is definitely getting BLACKED.
BLACKED RAW
behind his back.

Funny GIF
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Gargantuan and owlofathena
Every single Nick Fuentes debate ends like this. Bro literally can’t lose a debate, he has Joker energy.

 
  • +1
Reactions: Gargantuan
Virgin Shaming is even more pathetic when it's coming from a 60 year old TV journalist and has a wife that so obviously sleeps with other men and Piers knows it but goes along with it because he is a cuck who can't wear the trousers in the relationship. It's beyond cringe, it's despicable. His discussion with Tommy Robinson pissed me off so much I had to turn it off. The only great thing he has done was walking out of Good Morning Britain because he wouldn't apologize to Meghan Markle.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gargantuan

Similar threads

Gmogger
Replies
357
Views
21K
autistic_tendencies
autistic_tendencies

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top