Pillars of attractiveness questions

arx

arx

manlet
Joined
Jul 9, 2026
Posts
1,085
Reputation
1,252
Would you guys rank them in order of importance? Or would you say they’re all fairly equal.

I would say, for males atleast, i think in general a majority of people would rank the pillars in this order

Harmony
Misc
Dimo
Ang

Personally I think dimo would be higher up if we were to rank them

What are your guys thoughts?
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Scandi., iamnotaracist and Stalker
 
Would you guys rank them in order of importance? Or would you say they’re all fairly equal.

I would say, for males atleast, i think a general people would rank the pillars in this order

Harmony
Misc
Dimo
Ang

Personally I think dimo is just as important if we were to rank them

What are your guys thoughts?
1. Harm
2. Misc
3 and 4. Either Ang or Dimo is better, personally I'd say dimo is more important than ang
 
  • +1
Reactions: arx
1. Harm
2. Misc
3 and 4. Either Ang or Dimo is better, personally I'd say dimo is more important than ang
I would agree with this list except dimo, I feel like the higher dimo you have it can make up for other lacking factors (like harmony)

For example : Louis Allen the third
IMG 5708



He looks good, eyeballing it you might call him chad, but in reality an objective analysis will show that his harmony is extraordinarily lowz.

but with his harmony being low, it gets made up for with his dimorphism being so high at a 9.

That’s why I have dimo over misc and Ang personally but I get where you’re coming from.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ltnheII
Would you guys rank them in order of importance? Or would you say they’re all fairly equal.

I would say, for males atleast, i think in general a majority of people would rank the pillars in this order

Harmony
Misc
Dimo
Ang

Personally I think dimo would be higher up if we were to rank them

What are your guys thoughts?

1. Harmony
2. Misc
3. Angularity
4. Dimo

However in my opinion

8 harm with 9 misc looks better than 9 harm with 8 misc
 
  • +1
Reactions: arx and iblamecurrygenetics
I would agree with this list except dimo, I feel like the higher dimo you have it can make up for other lacking factors (like harmony)

For example : Louis Allen the thirdView attachment 5437379


He looks good, eyeballing it you might call him chad, but in reality an objective analysis will show that his harmony is extraordinarily lowz.

but with his harmony being low, it gets made up for with his dimorphism being so high at a 9.

That’s why I have dimo over misc and Ang personally but I get where you’re coming from.
Dimo over misc and ang must be the most ridiculous thing I ever heard on this forum, and no one would eyeball him at Chad JFL
 
harm
misc
dimo
ang
i feel like a commonality between most lists is that angularity tends to be the lowest and evth else is up for debate
 
Would you guys rank them in order of importance? Or would you say they’re all fairly equal.

I would say, for males atleast, i think in general a majority of people would rank the pillars in this order

Harmony
Misc
Dimo
Ang

Personally I think dimo would be higher up if we were to rank them

What are your guys thoughts?
I wouldn’t put dimo any higher
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: arx
harm
misc
dimo
ang
i feel like a commonality between most lists is that angularity tends to be the lowest and evth else is up for debate
Nah all my top analyzer friends have ang above dimo
 
  • Woah
Reactions: arx
maybe if you joined org 3 days ago:lul:
Really?

I feel like if you were to put him a room with just random people from around the world and they were to eyeball it, they were to call him chad.

Not that he is.
 
  • +1
Reactions: iblamecurrygenetics
Nah all my top analyzer friends have ang above dimo
i still feel it’s up to debate ngl
there’s always cases of X being better than Y but in another case Y is better than X yk
 
Dimo over misc and ang must be the most ridiculous thing I ever heard on this forum, and no one would eyeball him at Chad JFL
Really?

I feel like if you were to put him a room with just random people from around the world and they were to eyeball it, they were to call him chad.

Not that he is.
 
Really?

I feel like if you were to put him a room with just random people from around the world and they were to eyeball it, they were to call him chad.

Not that he is.
Thats because normies use chad for anyone above Mtn
 
  • +1
Reactions: iblamecurrygenetics and arx
i still feel it’s up to debate ngl
there’s always cases of X being better than Y but in another case Y is better than X yk
Well i dont get how would dimo be higher than angularity?
 
  • +1
Reactions: iblamecurrygenetics
Really?

I feel like if you were to put him a room with just random people from around the world and they were to eyeball it, they were to call him chad.

Not that he is.
first glance the eye contrast does him really well i think i’m a room of like 100 ppl he’s probably gonna be most or at the very worst 2nd-3rd
 
Well i dont get how would dimo be higher than angularity?
i’ve seen a couple dudes who have high angularity but they look androgynous from a few feminine features and it made their faces look weird
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: arx
Thats because normies use chad for anyone above Mtn
Obviously good looking , but no where near Chad.

thus why I said most people (basically normies), eyeballing him, once you analyze him and realize his harm is like a 5(if I remember), you’ll realize he isn’t chad
 
  • +1
Reactions: iblamecurrygenetics
i’ve seen a couple dudes who have high angularity but they look androgynous from a few feminine features and it made their faces look weird
Most likely harm or misc failos then
 
  • +1
Reactions: iblamecurrygenetics
But again I am still learning so
 
  • +1
Reactions: iblamecurrygenetics
10% harm 5% ang 5% dimo 5% misc 60% appeal 30% psl
 
probably right then
now that i think ab it ang n dimo are like either or
i would argue ang to be much more important tho, angularity isnt just Hollow cheeks its things like gonion shape and eversion, zygomatic shape and projection, Chin shape squareness and height, example of two models who have major angularity failos is sean o prys gonions and simon nessmans chin width, and if you have high harm you most likely have high enough dimo (10 dimo is cope) i explained why in a former post not to long ago
 
  • +1
Reactions: arx
I had it


Harmony
Misc
Dimo
Ang


Idk anymore

Isn’t dimo related to things like more bonemass?
i would argue ang to be much more important tho, angularity isnt just Hollow cheeks its things like gonion shape and eversion, zygomatic shape and projection, Chin shape squareness and height, example of two models who have major angularity failos is sean o prys gonions and simon nessmans chin width, and if you have high harm you most likely have high enough dimo (10 dimo is cope) i explained why in a former post not to long ago
 

Similar threads

CelestialEmpire
Replies
5
Views
63
Rxndependant
Rxndependant
Fritter77
Replies
0
Views
45
Fritter77
Fritter77
Fritter77
Replies
7
Views
92
Fritter77
Fritter77
GG's
Replies
0
Views
13
GG's
GG's
abdo 1569
Replies
15
Views
75
abdo 1569
abdo 1569

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →