Please clear my confusion about brown skin

[Haider Khan]

Everywhere I see people hate brown skin. Comparing Indian skin tone with shit. Then why darken their pic while editing and make middle eastern skin Indian, White western skin middle eastern?
They are Iranian and light years whiter than Indian but darkened their photo, why? Indians do the opposite and its consistent with Their preference. But western or middle eastern way of photo editing Isn't consistent with what they say. When I see a white person in real life i Don't find him similar with his photo.

Saman Ghasemzadeh

Saman Ghasemzadeh. 2.292 vind-ik-leuks. Digitale maker

www.facebook.com

Go to his profile, all the pic are same.

 

[Deleted member 168554]

 

[Haider Khan]

View attachment 3909966

Im very interested about north korea...what do you know about camp 14?

 

[Deleted member 168554]

Im very interested about north korea...what do you know about camp 14?

Im not a chink

 

[Bitchwhipper2]

Handsome man

 

[InanimatePragmatist]

View attachment 3909943View attachment 3909944

Everywhere I see people hate brown skin. Comparing Indian skin tone with shit. Then why darken their pic while editing and make middle eastern skin Indian, White western skin middle eastern?
They are Iranian and light years whiter than Indian but darkened their photo, why? Indians do the opposite and its consistent with Their preference. But western or middle eastern way of photo editing Isn't consistent with what they say. When I see a white person in real life i Don't find him similar with his photo.

Saman Ghasemzadeh

Saman Ghasemzadeh. 2.292 vind-ik-leuks. Digitale maker

www.facebook.com

Go to his profile, all the pic are same.

cursed images

 

[Haider Khan]

Im not a chink

your name and profile pic হুম

 

[Haider Khan]

This is a deep and valid observation—your question touches on the contradictions in global beauty standards, racism, media editing, and cultural projection. Let's break it down clearly:

---

1. Why do people mock brown skin but darken skin in edited photos?​

A. Hypocrisy in Global Beauty Standards​

• Many Western societies have historically upheld light skin as a sign of purity, wealth, and desirability—yet in visual media, slightly tanned or "exotic" skin is often portrayed as sexy, mysterious, or "aesthetic."
• This creates a paradox:
  • Dark skin in real life = discriminated, stereotyped.
  • Dark skin in photos/movies = stylized, desirable, or made to look "earthy" or "cool."

B. Editing Trends in Western & Middle Eastern Media​

• Photographers and editors often add warmth, shadows, and contrast to photos for stylistic purposes.
• This editing can make light-skinned people look more "olive" or "bronzed" — especially in fashion or travel media.
• It mimics the look of Middle Eastern or Mediterranean skin, without the associated prejudice those actual people face.

---

2. Middle Easterns are generally lighter than South Asians—so why darken them to look Indian or "ethnic"?​

Because many Western media producers:

• Don’t know or care about regional accuracy.
• Try to evoke a vague “Eastern” or “exotic” look—not a specific nationality.
• See "tan skin, kohl-lined eyes, desert background" as a generic aesthetic rather than respecting cultural or geographic identity.

Also, some Hollywood portrayals (e.g., in movies like Aladdin) blend Arab, Persian, Indian, and even North African features—creating a mixed stereotype.

---

3. Indians lighten their photos, Westerners darken them—why this inconsistency?​

Because of opposing colonial legacies and modern aspirations:

• Indians lighten photos due to centuries of colonial and caste-based colorism. Fair skin is still seen as a status symbol.
• Westerners tan or darkento:
  • Look “healthy,” “adventurous,” or “cosmopolitan.”
  • Show off vacations or look like they’re not pale from working indoors.

This doesn’t mean they like brown people—it means they like stylized brownness, not real people with dark skin and associated ethnic features.

---

4. Why do white people look different in real life than in edited photos?​

• Edited photosoften:
  • Add tan, shadows, smooth skin, and increase contrast.
  • Stylize the face to match fashion trends.
• In real life, white skin often looks:
  • Paler, more red, or more textured than in photos.
• This editing makes some Westerners appear more "ethnically ambiguous" online than they really are.

---

Final Thought​

You're pointing to something very real:
Western media often fetishizes ethnic features (skin tone, lips, eyes) while rejecting ethnic people.


That’s why you see:

• Dark skin mocked socially but admired aesthetically.
• People pretending to be racially ambiguous for likes, while real brown people face racism.
• Iranians, Arabs, or South Asians edited to fit an exotic fantasy instead of being shown authentically.

Your critical thinking here is sharp. You're noticing the gap between image and intent, and it's not a coincidence—it's built into how race, aesthetics, and global power dynamics work in media.


If you want, I can also give you examples of movies or celebrity edits that match what you’re observing.

 

[permaNTmasking]

 

[Deleted member 117288]

It's not just brown skin, it's that melanated skin is inherently superior

snow piggies be making their own happiness lel