Political paradox from my opinion

truelighttriad

truelighttriad

Iron
Joined
Feb 26, 2024
Posts
38
Reputation
15
As I take it basing from the political compass the obvious correct opinion is to be right wing but the thing I have an unending issue with is the question of “is it correct to be libertarian or authoritarian ” in the short term both have their merits from different situations, as an example for the authoritarian side I’ll take china which around 30% of the population of which live in complete poverty as they deserve since most of them could change their situation at will, while the other 70 % lives in solid of great condition all the while the country itself is progressing at a rapid rate in most fields, the problem arrises when the leader(xi jinping)passes , it isn’t known weather the next leader will be as competent as the last.

As for the libertarian side the future of the country is decided by the general values /opinions of the public which in the long term are bound to be destroyed by 3rd party organisations (in our case the Jews ) who don’t care about the wellbeing of the nation and only feel a need for personal gain,

So to sum up, in the short term both sides could work but in the long term they are both doomed to fail, so I don’t know which side is better overall,

I would like to hear the opinion of org rotters on this matter
 
  • +1
Reactions: Hess and iblamecurrygenetics
i’d be fine with either no government or china level
no point in the western ideas on a “in between”
 
i’d be fine with either no government or china level
no point in the western ideas on a “in between”
Yeah in between is doomed to fail sooner while progressing less in that time , so what I’ve come to by myself is that both variants would work out as well as the other, the idiots of the European Union decided to sacrifice success for equality which does not exist, at the end of the day everything comes down to the survival of the fittest
 
  • +1
Reactions: iblamecurrygenetics
Yeah in between is doomed to fail sooner while progressing less in that time , so what I’ve come to by myself is that both variants would work out as well as the other, the idiots of the European Union decided to sacrifice success for equality which does not exist, at the end of the day everything comes down to the survival of the fittest
it’s just all of the stupid social programs that do nothing and pretend like the government actually cares lmao
all they want is ur money and nothing else
 
it’s just all of the stupid social programs that do nothing and pretend like the government actually cares lmao
all they want is ur money and nothing else
The programmes are just propaganda/ distraction from the real problems, all forms of extremism are criticised in media because the politicians know that basically any form of extremist government would benefit the people more instead of the politicians who want money/power
 
Unfetted capitalism will not be a good thing, china has it right to a degree, let capitalists have control and suddenly your native population is getting replaced for cheap labor, rather control them heavily than let them act freely without any restrictions
 
Unfetted capitalism will not be a good thing, china has it right to a degree, let capitalists have control and suddenly your native population is getting replaced for cheap labor, rather control them heavily than let them act freely without any restrictions
This is why a lot of NS even thought the bolsheviks even more preferable than the kike jew overlords in america
 
  • +1
Reactions: truelighttriad

Similar threads

Jason Voorhees
Replies
42
Views
314
inyerta
inyerta
NoExit
Replies
5
Views
37
Centurion Hunter
Centurion Hunter
emulator
Replies
15
Views
91
mrfriday
mrfriday
romey_y
Replies
28
Views
101
fraudedsub5
F
agarthancha
Replies
49
Views
230
spanishfoidslayer
spanishfoidslayer

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →