Politics megathread. Ask me anything

Explain why I’m interested
Idk if it would work in the modern era though
I have my doubts too.

I'm a very radical person, I don't believe in freedom. With freedom comes exploitation and degeneracy. I'm very traditional too
 
Why are you left wing ?
 
Why are you economically left-wing? Surely you're not a commie? Whereabouts on the left side of the spectrum are you? I presume since you said you're NS, you would describe yourself as aligning with the Third Position.
Communist economics are very similar to NS economics
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: registerfasterusing
Communist economics are very similar to NS economics
Nah. Natsoc economics are hierarchical and rigid unlike communism which is all about equality. Nazis despised equality. Workers in nazi germany for example didn't have rights to any strikes or protests for worker's rights. Hitler said that national socialism is germanic tribalism and a germanic way of living unlike marxist socialism which bases great value on equality. The only thing that is similar between marxist socialism and natsoc is that the govt had control over the markets and a final say in what companies could produce. Natsoc is more close to state capitalism/corporatism than communism.
 
  • +1
Reactions: registerfasterusing and TAChipmunk
not one right take in this entire thread
 
Nah. Natsoc economics are hierarchical and rigid unlike communism which is all about equality. Nazis despised equality. Workers in nazi germany for example didn't have rights to any strikes or protests for worker's rights. Hitler said that national socialism is germanic tribalism and a germanic way of living unlike marxist socialism which bases great value on equality. The only thing that is similar between marxist socialism and natsoc is that the govt had control over the markets and a final say in what companies could produce. Natsoc is more close to state capitalism/corporatism than communism.
Workers in soviet Russia were also not allowed to strike or protest..
 
Workers in soviet Russia were also not allowed to strike or protest..
Not the point. The point was that in natsoc germany, they didn’t value so called ’’worker’s rights’’. You could also make the argument that ussr wasn’t communist but socialist. Natsoc thought doesn’t put any emphasis on class struggle which is an essential element of all socialist countries and socialist/communist thought. Nazism views inequality as natural and benefitial to the nation or ’’race’’ while communism does not.

Communism means a stateless society where everything is shared. This ideal is impossible to attain and this is the reason why every single so called communist states have failed.
 
Workers in soviet Russia were also not allowed to strike or protest..
Also the nazis abolished welfare, which again is an essential element of marxian socialist thought.
 
Also the nazis abolished welfare, which again is an essential element of marxian socialist thought.
:unsure: I don't think they did

Not the point. The point was that in natsoc germany, they didn’t value so called ’’worker’s rights’’. You could also make the argument that ussr wasn’t communist but socialist. Natsoc thought doesn’t put any emphasis on class struggle which is an essential element of all socialist countries and socialist/communist thought. Nazism views inequality as natural and benefitial to the nation or ’’race’’ while communism does not.

Communism means a stateless society where everything is shared. This ideal is impossible to attain and this is the reason why every single so called communist states have failed.
Why are you just straight up lying ? They didn't value "workers rights" ? While the nazis thought race inequality was natural they didn't think the same for those in the race.
 
:unsure: I don't think they did


Why are you just straight up lying ? They didn't value "workers rights" ? While the nazis thought race inequality was natural they didn't think the same for those in the race.
I'm not lying. They didn't believe in class struggle. Hitler wrote in mein kampf that welfare made people feeble and weak. The nazis had a charity organization but that's about it. As for Völkisch equality, yes it was equality before the law for all racial germans. However it was not economic equality for all germans. The nazis viewed life as a struggle so naturally they wanted people to struggle for their daily livelihood. The only welfare policies that were implemented in nazi germany were in the early 30s due to staggering unemployement. After they eliminated unemployement they eliminated nationalized welfare.
1751947287128


Besides why do you have a communist as your avi? I thought you were ancap?
 
  • +1
Reactions: psychomandible
I'm not lying. They didn't believe in class struggle. Hitler wrote in mein kampf that welfare made people feeble and weak. The nazis had a charity organization but that's about it. As for Völkisch equality, yes it was equality before the law for all racial germans. However it was not economic equality for all germans. The nazis viewed life as a struggle so naturally they wanted people to struggle for their daily livelihood. The only welfare policies that were implemented in nazi germany were in the early 30s due to staggering unemployement. After they eliminated unemployement they eliminated nationalized welfare.
View attachment 3897942

Besides why do you have a communist as your avi? I thought you were ancap?
I am ancap he is just a mogger
 
  • +1
Reactions: Volksstaffel
Answer this


Not necessarily wrong. A authoritarian regime doesn't really interfere in your power as a man tho.
Unless you're a insecure "alpha male" like Andrew Tate or something.
Under natsoc you have just as many possibilities to show off your strength as a man
 
  • +1
Reactions: CorinthianLOX and Clqs
If a nations strength comes from racial purity why did Nazi Germany rely on forced labor from conquered people and steal resources from ‘inferior’ nations to sustain its economy tbh tbh
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Volksstaffel
If a nations strength comes from racial purity why did Nazi Germany rely on forced labor from conquered people and steal resources from ‘inferior’ nations to sustain its economy tbh tbh
Don't think they depended on forced labour. They simply had the opportunity.
Resources are non existent in Germany. All we have is coal. So obviously we relied on foreign resources
 
  • +1
Reactions: VV62
Don't think they depended on forced labour. They simply had the opportunity.
Resources are non existent in Germany. All we have is coal. So obviously we relied on foreign resources
So the system only worked by invading others and using their resources doesn't seem that sustainable tbh
 
  • +1
Reactions: Volksstaffel
So the system only worked by invading others and using their resources doesn't seem that sustainable tbh
The system was very successful for 7 years without invasion by trade with others.
Germany will always be reliant on other countries.
Invading them and conquering their resources is a reasonable and smart approach
 
  • +1
Reactions: VV62
Wyd when every party js shit
 
  • +1
Reactions: Volksstaffel
  • +1
Reactions: CorinthianLOX

Similar threads

SubSigma
Replies
38
Views
273
laworg
laworg
lifeless
Replies
41
Views
563
lifeless
lifeless
asdvek
Replies
29
Views
268
highcheekbones
highcheekbones
superpsycho
Replies
21
Views
224
veganessujuc@gmail.
veganessujuc@gmail.
heightmaxxing
Replies
5
Views
58
heightmaxxing
heightmaxxing

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top