poll (face and height)

[islaymtbs]

who’s gonna do better with girls overall?

 

[GABA.]

whats cl?

 

[islaymtbs]

whats cl?

Cl is chadlite

 

[CalmFrog]

hard one, If the 5'6 guy is hard stuck at 5'6 as in no shoes or lifts make him taller then hes sadly just way too short to compare to someone who is 6'3+, it wouldn't matter if he had a chad face either, because mtns are still above average they still look good

 

[loty]

6'7 mtn has 5x the smv of a manlet cl

 

[islaymtbs]

hard one, If the 5'6 guy is hard stuck at 5'6 as in no shoes or lifts make him taller then hes sadly just way too short to compare to someone who is 6'3+, it wouldn't matter if he had a chad face either, because mtns are still above average they still look good

so let’s say a lmtn would he be slightly above average

 

[GABA.]

6'7 mtn would do better. Though i don't think the difference would be that significant.

 

[islaymtbs]

6'7 mtn has 5x the smv of a manlet cl

let’s say a 6’7 lmtn what would be his SMV /10 overall to girls

 

[loty]

let’s say a 6’7 lmtn what would be his SMV /10 overall to girls

hard to put a number on that scale but he'd be slaying fs even as a lmtn

 

[Topkra]

If the cl was at least 5'9 i would choose him but mtn clears

 

[CalmFrog]

so let’s say a lmtn would he be slightly above average

hltn is your average person looks wise, mtn is where attractiveness starts to show and the failos start to lessen in number and severity (narrow jaw, long/short philrtum and structural faults along those lines that aren't too strong to throw off facial harmony)

thats why when you call someone htn without them looking absolutely attractive (as in objectively) you get berated like a dog in the comments lmao, htn is only given to people who are physically fit and have minor failos (because otherwise you can't rate them properly)

your comparison would've been more thought provoking if the tall guy was ltn because then he would've been average looks wise, but still be in the elite height genetics range

 

[islaymtbs]

hltn is your average person looks wise, mtn is where attractiveness starts to show and the failos start to lessen in number and severity (narrow jaw, long/short philrtum and structural faults along those lines that aren't too strong to throw off facial harmony)

thats why when you call someone htn without them looking absolutely attractive (as in objectively) you get berated like a dog in the comments lmao, htn is only given to people who are physically fit and have minor failos (because otherwise you can't rate them properly)

your comparison would've been more thought provoking if the tall guy was ltn because then he would've been average looks wise, but still be in the elite height genetics range

Thanks man, so does the average guy hltn still do good at that height

 

[islaymtbs]

let’s say a 6’7 lmtn what would be his SMV /10 overall to girls

Loty can you say