[POLL] Facial Depth to Head Depth Ratio

[thecel]

Ideal Facial Depth to Head Depth Ratio Poll

Facial Depth to Head Depth Ratio

[Measured in Side View] The Distance from the Nasion to the Tragus : The Distance from the Nasion to the Occiput Read More: It’s over if you have a bad front/back ratio The key to an attractive side profile (warrior skull) is a high front–back ratio. The “front” is the section of the skull ahead of the ears, and the “back” is the section of the skull behind the ears. Attractive men have sagittally long front skulls and sagittally short rear skulls: See the... looksmax.org

---

Which of the following is ideal?


44%




47.8%




51.5%




55.5%




59.4%




62.3%

 

[thecel]

imo:

55% to 60% is the ideal range for aesthetics. Having this ratio in this range gives you that modelesque mogger forward-grown side profile look.

Ratios above 60% look uncanny and unideal.

50% to 55% is a normal-looking, sub-ideal range. You don’t look mogger and you don’t look subhuman. Just regular and standard.

---

Sub 50% is subhuman tier. Sub 45% is deformed tier.

40% front/back ratio

 

[first snow]

imo:

55% to 60% is the ideal range for aesthetics. Having this ratio in this range gives you that modelesque mogger forward-grown side profile look.

View attachment 3729317View attachment 3729295View attachment 3729301View attachment 3729306View attachment 3729308

Ratios above 60% look uncanny and unideal.

50% to 55% is a normal-looking, sub-ideal range. You don’t look mogger and you don’t look subhuman. Just regular and standard.

---

Sub 50% is subhuman tier. Sub 45% is deformed tier.

View attachment 3729325

40% front/back ratio

agreed

 

[thecel]

bump

 

[Beniceandkind]

irrelevant

 

[obscuredusk]

55.5

 

[thecel]

55.5

the woman in your avi has 10/10 eyes

 

[thecel]

 

[Lookologist003]

Head depth should be like 40% of facial depth.