poll woud you settle with a promiscuous woman

read thread.

  • I would settle down

  • I will keep searching another one.


Results are only viewable after voting.
Deleted member 11604

Deleted member 11604

Everything ever said here by me was satire only.
Joined
Dec 30, 2020
Posts
2,388
Reputation
5,769
Imagine you're in you're 33 you have a bodycount of 300 different girls. you're a GL chad
you want to settle down and make a family, you find a 21yo girl perfect in everyways possible, your dream girl, she will give you mogger sons, she's feminine and submissive, and very attracted to you. and be an exelent mother, and is a freak in bed.
but she have a body count of 90, she will never cheat on you,
would you settle down with her? or keep searching another girl?
(remember you're a Chad)
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 7076
No
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
No lol
1630059846118
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: fras, gamma, CtrlAltDelete and 1 other person
No
 
  • +1
Reactions: WontStopNorwooding
Yes because she won't tell me anyway.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 15099, 5'8manlet, Basedprincess and 6 others
Settling down before 40 is cope
 
  • +1
Reactions: oldcelloser
Quite easily and anyone who says otherwise is a lying faggot.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 15099, Deleted member 8904, Deleted member 14262 and 2 others
Beggars can't be choosers
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 15099, Elvisandreaa, Deleted and 2 others
what do you think @Wallenberg ?
btw I will stop to insult you now,
I realise that my jokes might had been quite hurtfull, and it wasn't in my purpose, I was just trying to make some jokes ahaa.
I wanted to apologise sincerly, if you felt offended by some of my childfish tellings.:)
 
90 bodies for a woman comes with psychological damage.
 
  • +1
Reactions: AscendingHero, oldcelloser, one job away and 6 others
>feminine and submissive, excellent mother, will never cheat
>90 N-count
pick one
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: AscendingHero, p0lishsubhuman, 5'8manlet and 12 others
absolutely fucking not. i'd rather die alone than lose my dignity settling for anything less than a virgin
 
  • +1
Reactions: p0lishsubhuman and oldcelloser
90x100 would be right

my town is small so she would have fucked at least 80% of the guys

No.
 
Imagine you're in you're 33 you have a bodycount of 300 different girls. you're a GL chad
you want to settle down and make a family, you find a 21yo girl perfect in everyways possible, your dream girl, she will give you mogger sons, she's feminine and submissive, and very attracted to you. and be an exelent mother, and is a freak in bed.
but she have a body count of 90, she will never cheat on you,
would you settle down with her? or keep searching another girl?
(remember you're a Chad)
A true chad would never have that high of a bodycount jfl
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 14262, Deleted member 7076 and thickdickdaddy27
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: oldcelloser, Deleted and Deleted member 7076
as a true stacy wouldn't. they'd have 3 max
attractiveness and morals arent really correlated

a stacy is a stacy (physically) regardless of 1 or 100 bodycount
 
  • +1
Reactions: oldcelloser, mulattomaxxer, Basedprincess and 1 other person
as a true stacy wouldn't. they'd have 3 max
Thing is only reason to have like 20+ bodycount is using it as a cope for ur insecurity. If its for the sex the logical thing is to get a very very attractive fwb instead of some mediocre girls that chad can pull daily
 
  • +1
Reactions: mulattomaxxer, one job away, thickdickdaddy27 and 1 other person
attractiveness and morals arent really correlated

a stacy is a stacy (physically) regardless of 1 or 100 bodycount
A flawless person wouldnt be insecure. Read post above
 
  • +1
Reactions: one job away and Deleted member 7076
90 bodycount = mental illness as a woman. There is nothing in the hypo that says she won't do something absolutely more damaging than cheating on you. There are a million other ways she could fuck your life up.
 
  • +1
Reactions: AscendingHero, mulattomaxxer and thickdickdaddy27
attractiveness and morals arent really correlated

a stacy is a stacy (physically) regardless of 1 or 100 bodycount
true stacies more often than not are a lot less promescious than true chads, who also don't sleep around much before they settle and start a family
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: AscendingHero, gamma and Deleted member 7076
true stacies more often than not are a lot less promescious than true chads, who also don't sleep around much before they settle and start a family
so 'true' just means a girl with good values

would u rather a true becky or a slutty stacy to wife?

becky for sure for me ngl
 
No i can get better
 
I was talking flawless in apperance
how do u explain some supermodels feeling insecure? they are clear 10/10's, yet something in their life still makes them insecure, perhaps shit parents
 
Imagine you're in you're 33 you have a bodycount of 300 different girls. you're a GL chad
you want to settle down and make a family, you find a 21yo girl perfect in everyways possible, your dream girl, she will give you mogger sons, she's feminine and submissive, and very attracted to you. and be an exelent mother, and is a freak in bed.
but she have a body count of 90, she will never cheat on you,
would you settle down with her? or keep searching another girl?
(remember you're a Chad)
What kind of question? No
 
  • +1
Reactions: oldcelloser
so 'true' just means a girl with good values

would u rather a true becky or a slutty stacy to wife?

becky for sure for me ngl
nope i mean true stacy in physical appearance. the more attractive she is, the less likely she's going to sleep around. like @ArvidGustavsson said having a high body count stems from physical insecurity
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 7076
how do u explain some supermodels feeling insecure? they are clear 10/10's, yet something in their life still makes them insecure, perhaps shit parents
Theyre not perfect just very good looking. Its impossible to be insecure about looks If ur flawless
 
  • +1
Reactions: mulattomaxxer and Deleted member 7076
Not really. The psychological damage comes from not having sex as a man.
A man who’ve slept with that amount of women comes from insecurity and wanting to prove himself he can do it.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: oldcelloser and thickdickdaddy27
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: AscendingHero, oldcelloser, mulattomaxxer and 1 other person
Theyre all very ugly… proving my point
Ugly or not, men are designed to spread their seed as much as possible.

Chad was able to knock up lots of women just by sneaking in villages without ever having to reach a power position.
 
  • +1
Reactions: AscendingHero, oldcelloser and Deleted member 11604
Ugly or not, men are designed to spread their seed as much as possible.

Chad was able to knock up lots of women just by sneaking in villages without ever having to reach a power position.
do you agree with this tho, really attractive people nowadays particularly women have an overwhelming amount of options so they are really picky in who they sleep with, thus a low body count?
 
A man who’ve slept with that amount of women comes from insecurity and wanting to prove himself he can do it.
tbh a man who can achieve this high bodycount is a fucking king slayer not gonna lie, as long as the girls he slept with are above average;
But yeah Sleeping aroound don't act the same way for men as for women,
men are made to fuck the maximum of women possible
meanwhile women are made to chase quality.

If a dude sleep with 100 different girls he won't be as damaged that te girl who slept with 100 different guys;
 
  • +1
Reactions: oldcelloser
do you agree with this tho, really attractive people nowadays particularly women have an overwhelming amount of options so they are really picky in who they sleep with, thus a low body count?
Trying to build a harem as a man is extremely difficult and infeasible most of the time. But if a man actually has easy access to multiple fertile women with little consequence, he's obviously going to have sex with all of them.

The female sex drive is so low it's practically irrelevant. Women get slightly "horny" for good genes around their ovulatory phase, but other than that, women are mostly fucking for survival purposes (attention, resources, etc.).
 
  • +1
Reactions: thickdickdaddy27
tbh a man who can achieve this high bodycount is a fucking king slayer not gonna lie
But did he do it because he wanted to or just to have the psychological validation of being a slayer? I doubt a man without insecurities would need a 100+ bodycount.
 
The female sex drive is so low it's practically irrelevant. Women get slightly "horny" for good genes around their ovulatory phase, but other than that, women are mostly fucking for survival purposes (attention, resources, etc.).
Cope. The female preferences do not change in their ovulatory phase.
 
But did he do it because he wanted to or just to have the psychological validation of being a slayer? I doubt a man without insecurities would need a 100+ bodycount.
tbh you wouldn't be here if yoy didn't had insecurities
If slaying is what you like as a man, you should slay. Even if it is by insecurities because it increase your value.
 
  • +1
Reactions: AlexAP
tbh you wouldn't be here if yoy didn't had insecurities
If slaying is what you like as a man, you should slay. Even if it is by insecurities because it increase your value.
Of course but it proves my point. Slaying is due to insecurities often times, so a high bodycount for men has to with psychological damage too (at least in many cases). A man without insecurities would most likely prefer LTR.
 
  • +1
Reactions: oldcelloser and Deleted member 11604
Of course but it proves my point. Slaying is due to insecurities often times, so a high bodycount for men has to with psychological damage too (at least in many cases). A man without insecurities would most likely prefer LTR.
not false but I don't have insecurities,
but If I was A Chad I would sleep with at least 2-3 hundred of women before to settle down.
and I do thinks most of us would do the same.
Imagine being a Chad and being 50 and only having a body count of 5-10 because you're not insecure and prefer LTR. You can't get more teen pussies except escorts, or sugar babies, or fucking roasties.
Tbh i would have massive regrets to didn't have 20-30 higher slay count.
 
  • +1
Reactions: gamma
90 bodycount = mental illness as a woman. There is nothing in the hypo that says she won't do something absolutely more damaging than cheating on you. There are a million other ways she could fuck your life up.
just about average in the tinder age srs
she have a body count of 90, she will never cheat on you,
Captain America Lol GIF by mtv

boyo your IQ must be 85, im sorry for you
Settling down before 40 is cope
never "settle down" ; it only sets you up for a life of misery and servitude
A true chad would never have that high of a bodycount jfl
where do you get this shit from man? :feelskek: it depends on the Chad, tons of famous actors, musicians, Wilt Chamberlain etc. had 1000 or more, which meant
they enjoyed a lot of chubby 4s from time to time :feelskek:
Of course but it proves my point. Slaying is due to insecurities often times, so a high bodycount for men has to with psychological damage too (at least in many cases). A man without insecurities would most likely prefer LTR.
cope and you dont know how sexes and testosterone works (hint hint men and foids are totally different)
Quite easily and anyone who says otherwise is a lying faggot.
quite easily no, right? you couldnt be this beta if you're here right? :forcedsmile:
Thing is only reason to have like 20+ bodycount is using it as a cope for ur insecurity. If its for the sex the logical thing is to get a very very attractive fwb instead of some mediocre girls that chad can pull daily
cope; FWBs dont last, men want variety all their life unless low T
"very" attractive doesnt want FWb usually, she wants some HTN :bluepill: with money that can fund her desires
absolutely fucking not. i'd rather die alone than lose my dignity settling for anything less than a virgin
(y) only high T man here
Physchological damage for both genders
nah only for foids
 

Similar threads

Xangsane
Replies
192
Views
2K
diditeverbegin
diditeverbegin
Sloppyseconds
Replies
34
Views
2K
WINGLESS ANGEL
WINGLESS ANGEL
Xangsane
Replies
51
Views
5K
curryascenderr
C
D
  • Poll
Replies
10
Views
448
schizowarrior
schizowarrior
D
Replies
8
Views
678
Deleted member 84469
D

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top