Post examples of caucasoid skull features vs others

0hMan

0hMan

germano-gaelic gaunche - modführer
Staff
Joined
Dec 29, 2022
Posts
4,213
Reputation
9,588
Title, I see skull anthropology being thrown around so much on this forum but it seems like everyone says different things. Could you guys post examples? So fucking confusing
 
  • +1
Reactions: rand anon and poopoohead
4FD9A0BC 1020 4CD3 8CE9 2D70FFB7C07B
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: rooman, Deleted member 29155, User49 and 7 others
It's forensics terminology that is real but people on this forum like to pass it off as something it isn't. You'll see it brought up most often by Indian and ME ethnics in an attempt to portray themselves as white-adjacent.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: DrKlinefelterPhdMd, Deleted member 27987 and 0hMan
It's forensics terminology that is real but people on this forum like to pass it off as something it isn't. You'll see it brought up most often by Indian and ME ethnics in an attempt to portray themselves as white-adjacent.
That's what I think as well tbh LMFAO it's always brought up by indians or somalis. Partially I brought this up out of curiousity to myself though
 
Yep this is exactly what I fucking expected asking a question on this forum tbh

 
  • JFL
Reactions: rand anon
r
It's forensics terminology that is real but people on this forum like to pass it off as something it isn't. You'll see it brought up most often by Indian and ME ethnics in an attempt to portray themselves as white-adjacent.
CD798805 092E 4AA1 8538 EDD40FDE5FEB

indians are caucasians though.
 
  • +1
Reactions: 5'7 currychad, AscendingHero, Deleted member 21700 and 3 others
r

View attachment 2202457
indians are caucasians though.
Classifications that include 1/3rd of the entire human population mean nothing. It means nothing in day to day life and is just a sad attempt by ethnics to revive phrenology so they can LARP as almost-white on rotter forums.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Deleted member 29155, rooman, DrKlinefelterPhdMd and 4 others
Classifications that include 1/3rd of the entire human population mean nothing. It means nothing in day to day life and is just a sad attempt by ethnics to revive phrenology so they can LARP as almost-white on rotter forums.
Excellently said. How are you such a greycel? Easily best post I've seen in a long time.
 
  • +1
Reactions: DrKlinefelterPhdMd
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 21700, rand anon and Deleted member 24586
Caucasoid is narrow nose with high bridge
Negroid is flat and wide
Gook in betweem
 
Classifications that include 1/3rd of the entire human population mean nothing. It means nothing in day to day life and is just a sad attempt by ethnics to revive phrenology so they can LARP as almost-white on rotter forums.
They aren’t fully white, they are mixed. But they are definitely caucasians, And denying that is just very delusional and ignorant.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 21700 and rand anon
They aren’t fully white, they are mixed. But they are definitely caucasians, And denying that is just very delusional and ignorant.

Again, means literally nothing when your definition of 'Caucasian' includes the people of three separate continents who all look radically different within these categories to begin with. Somalis can pass more easily as Nigerians or Ugandans than they can as Norwegians, denying that is ACTUAL delusion.
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: DrKlinefelterPhdMd, 0hMan, STAMPEDE and 1 other person
Again, means literally nothing when your definition of 'Caucasian' includes the people of three separate continents who all look radically different within these categories to begin with. Somalis can pass more easily as Nigerians or Ugandans than they can as Norwegians, denying that is ACTUAL delusion.

You have no clue what you're talking about.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: rooman, Deleted member 21700, rand anon and 3 others
05267521 C79F 4730 AAB2 104EE9751AC6
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: rooman, AscendingHero, Deleted member 29155 and 2 others
Title, I see skull anthropology being thrown around so much on this forum but it seems like everyone says different things. Could you guys post examples? So fucking confusing
 

Attachments

  • 34F03C2A-1FDD-4A6E-9BB2-CAEBD4D387AC.png
    34F03C2A-1FDD-4A6E-9BB2-CAEBD4D387AC.png
    1.8 MB · Views: 0
  • +1
Reactions: 0hMan
You have no clue what you're talking about.
The entire Caucasoid classification is cope. There's a reason why every respectable institution and journal rejects that nonsense and says it's unscientific lmao
 
  • +1
Reactions: DrKlinefelterPhdMd and 0hMan
K
 

Attachments

  • B96C3EEA-7A23-4D6D-B4D1-611223220834.jpeg
    B96C3EEA-7A23-4D6D-B4D1-611223220834.jpeg
    224.2 KB · Views: 0
  • +1
Reactions: ElBastardo
The entire Caucasoid classification is cope. There's a reason why every respectable institution and journal rejects that nonsense and says it's unscientific lmao

They fucking don't. It's been used in anthropology since forever and it's extremely relevant and useful.

In fact they use mongoloid and caucasoid in this study i read recently:


"...reveal genealogical admixture between Caucasoid and Mongoloid ethnic groups, despite a Mongoloid physical appearance."

So yeah, you're clueless.
 
  • +1
Reactions: rooman, Deleted member 29155, rand anon and 4 others
Armenoid
 

Attachments

  • 52513B8C-41EB-4A9C-B85D-B6F824DF1DE1.jpeg
    52513B8C-41EB-4A9C-B85D-B6F824DF1DE1.jpeg
    144.9 KB · Views: 0
Again, means literally nothing when your definition of 'Caucasian' includes the people of three separate continents who all look radically different within these categories to begin with. Somalis can pass more easily as Nigerians or Ugandans than they can as Norwegians, denying that is ACTUAL delusion.
315F1659 66E0 4E4D 844A 06363C41B577

Bruh, indians are caucasoid, they have caucasoid skull, face, hair, nose, mouth, and dna, etc. You’re ignorant
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 29155 and Deleted member 21766
They fucking don't. It's been used in anthropology since forever and it's extremely relevant and useful.

In fact they use mongoloid and caucasoid in this study i read recently:


"...reveal genealogical admixture between Caucasoid and Mongoloid ethnic groups, despite a Mongoloid physical appearance."

So yeah, you're clueless.

Plos is a shit tier journal that has a reputation to match lmao.


'Caucasoid' is an arbitrary designation that is meaningless. It's valid only in forensics and even then the entire field of forensic anthropology isn't exactly 100% rock solid itself. Imagine unironically thinking Frenchmen and Indians are the same race.
 
  • +1
Reactions: DrKlinefelterPhdMd and 0hMan
"the mammal class is COPE! You have so many different animals under that label, from blue whales to humans, to mole rats!"

Me when i have no clue what taxonomy is.
 
  • +1
Reactions: STAMPEDE
Again, means literally nothing when your definition of 'Caucasian' includes the people of three separate continents who all look radically different within these categories to begin with. Somalis can pass more easily as Nigerians or Ugandans than they can as Norwegians, denying that is ACTUAL delusion.
E31AAEB5 6168 47D3 AD39 0DCBB74F4B14

They’re caucasians bro, their skull is caucasian and so is their dna. Stop being ignorant
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 24586 and rand anon
View attachment 2202506
Bruh, indians are caucasoid, they have caucasoid skull, face, hair, nose, mouth, and dna, etc. You’re ignorant

Steppe ancestry in Indians, the only ancestry that you could conceivably call 'white' present in Indians is 30% at the very most in extremely steppe-rich Brahmins. This is the same levels of 'white' ancestry present in African-Americans. Are African-Americans also white? Caucasoid features and 'hair texture' mean nothing btw. Straight hair is not unique to Indo-Europeans and neither is hirsuteness.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: DrKlinefelterPhdMd, 0hMan, Sub0 and 1 other person
p
Steppe ancestry in Indians, the only ancestry that you could conceivably call 'white' present in Indians is 30% at the very most in extremely steppe-rich Brahmins. This is the same levels of 'white' ancestry present in African-Americans. Are African-Americans also white? Caucasoid features and 'hair texture' mean nothing btw. Straight hair is not unique to Indo-Europeans and neither is hirsuteness.
E7A8D441 B6BB 40E0 AF64 F306B9E70A3C
78FA71BC 4075 4D00 9652 BDFC97BEC1AE

Bruh, the more you talk the more you expose yourself. Just stop being so ignorant and do some research before being so ignorant biased and delusional.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 24586
"the mammal class is COPE! You have so many different animals under that label, from blue whales to humans, to mole rats!"

Me when i have no clue what taxonomy is.

You can divide human phenotypical variation into dozens and dozens of different assortments. There's nothing suggesting that 'Caucasoid' is any more inherently correct than any other random potential grouping. Especially when the variation is something you need to use calipers to discern.
 
  • +1
Reactions: DrKlinefelterPhdMd, 0hMan and Sub0
Steppe ancestry in Indians, the only ancestry that you could conceivably call 'white' present in Indians is 30% at the very most in extremely steppe-rich Brahmins. This is the same levels of 'white' ancestry present in African-Americans. Are African-Americans also white? Caucasoid features and 'hair texture' mean nothing btw. Straight hair is not unique to Indo-Europeans and neither is hirsuteness.

Indians are like 75% west eurasian lmfao. Steppe ancestry isnt the only caucasoid ancestry they have. You're forgetting that veddoid features are halfway caucasoid aswell, not as distant as negroid ones. In no world are african americans morphologically as "non white" as indians...
 
  • +1
Reactions: rand anon
Plos is a shit tier journal that has a reputation to match lmao.


'Caucasoid' is an arbitrary designation that is meaningless. It's valid only in forensics and even then the entire field of forensic anthropology isn't exactly 100% rock solid itself. Imagine unironically thinking Frenchmen and Indians are the same race.
Bruh, theyre the same race, indians are just far more mixed than the french are
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: 0hMan and Deleted member 24586
This is not how majority of indians look like. This is how some dravidians look like but majority of indians dont look like this. They look dark with caucasian skull and faces. Some of them look light dark. Modern Indians are caucasian mixed with dravidians and mongoloids
 
  • +1
Reactions: rand anon
If the caucasoid label was useless it wouldn't be used after centuries. Its a great way to define the macro races. Beaky features = caucasoid, simple.
 
  • +1
Reactions: User49 and rand anon
This is not how majority of indians look like. This is how some dravidians look like but majority of indians dont look like this. They look dark with caucasian skull and faces. Some of them look light dark. modern Indians are caucasian mixed with dravidians and mongoloids
 102751338 hi048386279


Right.

Migrants 27


I guess the Caucasians must've just been hiding on that day. 100% Medmoggers ( if you ignore the black hair, dark eyes, dark skin, sunken eyes, and basically every other Indian feature )
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: rooman, DrKlinefelterPhdMd and 0hMan
@seleucus how would you define the "white race"? im curious
 
another study that uses the "mongoloid" classification:

 
@seleucus how would you define the "white race"? im curious
The indigenous peoples of Europe. Everyone else is varying shades of ethnic-- at best white passing ethnic.
 
  • +1
Reactions: DrKlinefelterPhdMd and 0hMan
The indigenous peoples of Europe. Everyone else is varying shades of ethnic-- at best white passing ethnic.
Which people do you consider indigenous to europe? WHG, ANF and Steppe mixed people?
 
Which people do you consider indigenous to europe? WHG, ANF and Steppe mixed people?
I don't really care about the proportions since genetic drift and sexual selection over the past few thousand years has turned ancient admixture proportions irrelevant. If your people are native to the European continent, you are white.
 
  • +1
Reactions: 0hMan
  • +1
Reactions: DrKlinefelterPhdMd
I don't really care about the proportions since genetic drift and sexual selection over the past few thousand years has turned ancient admixture proportions irrelevant. If your people are native to the European continent, you are white.
Dont you think some people outside of europe also deserve to be considered white? Ancient people didn't consider our modern day, constructed, european borders whenever they travelled around. You can probably find a ton of them in central asia for example.
 
Dont you think some people outside of europe also deserve to be considered white? Ancient people didn't consider our modern day, constructed, european borders whenever they travelled around. You can probably find a ton of them in central asia for example.

Nah. The vast majority of Central Asians are clearly not white and even the more 'white' looking ones often have visibly ethnic features. White-passing ethnic. Not white.
 
  • +1
Reactions: DrKlinefelterPhdMd and 0hMan
Cope. You will never be white. You are not white adjacent. You're ethnic and you're going to die ethnic.
So you willingly admitted defeat by turning to insults? I guess I won this debate since youre seething hard and insulting and bringing no proof for your statements other than biased opinions and insults. Facts aren’t gonna change because you are mad
 
Nah. The vast majority of Central Asians are clearly not white and even the more 'white' looking ones often have visibly ethnic features. White-passing ethnic. Not white.
At least you consider all euros to be white. Many ppl here call south and east euros non white, both of which exclude me...
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: User49, 0hMan and Deleted member 29710
No progthanism, tall nose Bridge, narrower, faces on average very projected noses
 
View attachment 2202593
Facts do not lie. Continue posting cherry picked pictures like you’re proving something
How come like 3 of the maps you've posted has some countries selected as caucasoid and then none of those in the next lmfao
 
  • JFL
Reactions: DrKlinefelterPhdMd
At least you consider all euros to be white. Many ppl here call south and east euros non white, both of which exclude me...
Only I1 is white, bro
 
Only I1 is white, bro
I1 is not white, it's way less white than R1 and is associated with neolithic farmers and subhuman hunter gatherers
 

Similar threads

_MVP_
Replies
8
Views
156
_MVP_
_MVP_
Third Eye
Replies
110
Views
1K
hopecel
hopecel
theonewhorisesabove
Replies
22
Views
267
DarkTriadBeliever
DarkTriadBeliever
Orc
Replies
87
Views
2K
AverageCurryEnjoyer
AverageCurryEnjoyer
dstivvy
Replies
12
Views
314
imabetanumale
imabetanumale

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top