Post the ideal male and ideal female body

EnglandBadman

EnglandBadman

Ex Drug Dealer
Joined
Aug 19, 2023
Posts
5,710
Reputation
6,788
Reply with candidates for the best male and female body, most thumbs up wins
 
  • +1
Reactions: nigkook
None brocel
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20231007_162659.jpg
    IMG_20231007_162659.jpg
    196.2 KB · Views: 0
  • +1
Reactions: Rimaxtis
There is no ideal since ppl have preferences

It’s not right to suggest ur specific preference is the single right one and is a huge sign of low IQ

Ironically it’s what most users here do
 
  • +1
Reactions: Joe Rogancel, Deleted member 33711, Deleted member 44486 and 2 others
 
1631305959514
1665939114903914


1674384770851523
1675823605802214


can't wait for the copes.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Deleted member 69862, greywind, Detective and 14 others
IMG 20240107 172105
IMG 20240107 172033
 
  • +1
Reactions: wayme, datboijj and Loveland
dunno if this makes me gay af or straight and high-T, but I can think of at least 10 examples off the top of my head for the perfect male physique (and have a very concrete image of it in my head), but for women I'm just like "whatever so long as she's hot".
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Primalsplit, g0op, Big White Cuck and 1 other person
David Laid & Maxwell Krause
 
If u disagree your retarded
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3204.jpeg
    IMG_3204.jpeg
    286.6 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_3203.jpeg
    IMG_3203.jpeg
    51.2 KB · Views: 0
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: 5.5psl, Rimaxtis, datboijj and 4 others
Female
1699448997987855

1698950606994979


Male

Ideal body
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Av0nr, Gilbert_Durandal, boxface34 and 3 others
There is no ideal since ppl have preferences

It’s not right to suggest ur specific preference is the single right one and is a huge sign of low IQ

Ironically it’s what most users here do
most thumbs up wins
which is why he said the one most people like is ideal, or closest to ideal
 
  • +1
Reactions: EnglandBadman
dunno if this makes me gay af or straight and high-T, but I can think of at least 10 examples off the top of my head for the perfect male physique (and have a very concrete image of it in my head), but for women I'm just like "whatever so long as she's hot".
Its fine. You're an aspie who wants the ideal male body so you know what that looks like to have a concrete goal to strive for. For female bodies theres a variety thats attractive.
 
  • +1
Reactions: kanderior
too skinny lol
pictures make you look way fatter than you actually are so you have to be leaner than what you want to be perceived as on photos.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 69862 and LooksOrDeath
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 30845
If u disagree your retarded
Right is probably accurate, but I consider ideal to me something natty that is achieved only through cardio and calisthenics almost exclusively so I have to disagree with left.
 
  • +1
Reactions: EnglandBadman and LooksOrDeath
  • JFL
Reactions: greywind, datboijj and BrendioEEE
There is no ideal since ppl have preferences

It’s not right to suggest ur specific preference is the single right one and is a huge sign of low IQ

Ironically it’s what most users here do
The ideal is simply what is most wide appealing to most men and women. A fat physique on average will be less attractive than a lean one
 
There is no ideal since ppl have preferences

It’s not right to suggest ur specific preference is the single right one and is a huge sign of low IQ

Ironically it’s what most users here do
Nigga kinda look like a bbc lightskin asian in that avi tbh
 
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: datboijj and SubSigma
Right is probably accurate, but I consider ideal to me something natty that is achieved only through cardio and calisthenics almost exclusively so I have to disagree with left.
Nigga that is achievable natty. He doesn’t even have that much muscle mass, just really nice structure
 
  • JFL
Reactions: BrendioEEE
Nigga that is achievable natty. He doesn’t even have that much muscle mass, just really nice structure
looks like he's hiding wide waist and his legs are short stumps
 
1704639062374
1704639084097
1704639146792


3871937_1674384770851523.gif


If you don't agree you're gay/don't know aesthetics.
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
Reactions: Big White Cuck
Proves you know shit about male aesthetics and how braindead this forum is. There's no beauty standard by which he looks good, just some chunky gymbro with wide waist and small calves.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Big White Cuck
Proves you know shit about male aesthetics and how braindead this forum is. There's no beauty standard by which he looks good, just some chunky gymbro with wide waist and small calves.
Ironic. Trevor Signorino doesn't bodymog Lebron because he's over half a foot shorter.
 
We're talking physique aesthetics retard.
Height is a critical component of physique aesthetics, retard.


Following your logic, there are probably plenty of manlet bodybuilders who bodymog Trevor Signorino.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Mainstream
Height is a critical component of physique aesthetics, retard.

Learn to read the study moron. 180cm guy with good frame was rated higher than 190 with bad frame. Not to mention this study did not compare guys over 2m so we don't know if this trend persists. Over for your reasoning skills.

1704641274011
 
  • +1
Reactions: PolisCommov and Primalsplit
Nigga that is achievable natty. He doesn’t even have that much muscle mass, just really nice structure
Natty in the lockers of SteroidsRus maybe.
 
Height is a critical component of physique aesthetics, retard.


Following your logic, there are probably plenty of manlet bodybuilders who bodymog Trevor Signorino.

1704641645783

Another proof your only argument is shit is the fact that these were used as model jfl. Neither of the guys you and I posted fits these body types. Enough of muh studies.

And by my logic no manlet mogs Trevor because I'm comparing muscle insertions and body proportions. 2:1 swr is not ideal, nor is having ultra lean physiwue etc. Trevor is literally walking mogger unlike statusmaxxed lebron.
 
Last edited:
Learn to read the study moron.
Ironic.

180cm guy with good frame was rated higher than 190 with bad frame.
No, there is no difference between the "small" SHR 180 cm man and the "large" SHR 190 cm man in terms of attractiveness. The 190 cm man is also rated higher in terms of masculinity in that same comparison.
3872212 1704641274011


Not to mention this study did not compare guys over 2m so we don't know if this trend persists.
There is no reason to believe that the positive correlation does not extend past 190 cm.
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
Reactions: Big White Cuck and SlavicGeneral
Ironic.


No, there is no difference between the "small" SHR 180 cm man and the "large" SHR 190 cm man in terms of attractiveness. The 190 cm is also rated higher in terms of masculine in that same comparison.
View attachment 2659645


There is no reason to believe that the positive correlation does not extend past 190 cm.
Proves you are a dummy again. Masculinity is not related with attractiveness, literally what this forum preaches. So once again your argument is flawed. Goes to show, being 190 is no flaw when better physique than 206 guy jfl.

And there is a reason to believe trend doesn't persist idiot, because rate of increase in attractiveness slows down and could platou or possibly decrease. But your statistics skills are obviously shit.
 
Neither of the guys you and I posted fits these body types. Enough of muh studies.
Yes, because both Lebron and Trevor are significantly more dimorphic than the study examples. What's your point?

And by my logic no manlet mogs Trevor because I'm comparing muscle insertions and body proportions. 2:1 swr is not ideal, nor is having ultra lean physiwue etc.
Manlets can still have ideal muscle insertions and horizontal proportions.
 
Lol at thinking either LeBron or Trevor has ideal male body.
 
Proves you are a dummy again.
Ironic.

Masculinity is not related with attractiveness, literally what this forum preaches. So once again your argument is flawed.
No, there is no difference between the "small" SHR 180 cm man and the "large" SHR 190 cm man in terms of attractiveness.

And there is a reason to believe trend doesn't persist idiot, because rate of increase in attractiveness slows down
Even if the trend is logarithmic, a positive correlation would exist.

possibly decrease.
Im Sure Lebron James GIF by Uninterrupted


But your statistics skills are obviously shit.
Ironic.
 
Yes, because both Lebron and Trevor are significantly more dimorphic than the study examples. What's your point?
Point is your study means shit in this conversation and probably means nothing.
Manlets can still have ideal muscle insertions and horizontal proportions.
They can, but my claim is that Trevor literally has the most aesthetic physique on earth. There is no other guy like him. And obviously if 2 guys are same proportions wise the taller one wins, I never denied that. I just say that Lebron if same height as any gym goer is mogged hard and from these pixs we can't know if someone is 206cm or 156cm except giga famous ones such as Bron or Trevor.
 
Even if the trend is logarithmic, a positive correlation would exist.
Trend doesn't have to be logarithmic. It can start going down.

Look at trend of putting on muscle mass depending on number of sets. It reaches peak at 12-15 and starts dropping significantly according to many studies. Same shit here. Guys like shorter girls than them but only up to a point idiot. At some.point the preference decreases dummy. But like I said it is over for your iq and maths/statistics.
 
As far as the girl has small waist I'm good
Idc if she has no ass or tits, caring about these is low t behavior

Men just need big frame, big chest, small pelvis and be tall
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: EnglandBadman

Similar threads

possiblysub2
Replies
1
Views
125
ConfusedBolivian
ConfusedBolivian
Spike2010
Replies
7
Views
142
dnrwarrior11
dnrwarrior11
Rater727
Replies
19
Views
208
alpomer7
alpomer7
alpomer7
Replies
5
Views
370
alpomer7
alpomer7

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top