Praying Netherlands knock out Morocco

[Gengar’s Ghost]

Opsec saar

Already checked your IP.

 

[Quetila]

Already checked your IP.

HAHAHAHA fine just don’t expose, forgot you were an admin

 

[Gengar’s Ghost]

HAHAHAHA fine just don’t expose, forgot you were an admin

Don’t worry, your secret is safe with me.

 

[miserycel]

They may have had an economic boom but they haven’t advanced either militarily or technologically, unlike China.

Once again because the grounds to prevent an invasion simply were never there.

Arabs were dominating global trade markets whilst the CCP were killing their own people with famines jfl. None of what China did compared to what the Middle East did has any credit to pass to China, end of the day it’s all politics

 

[Gengar’s Ghost]

Once again because the grounds to prevent an invasion simply were never there.

Arabs were dominating global trade markets whilst the CCP were killing their own people with famines jfl. None of what China did compared to what the Middle East did has any credit to pass to China, end of the day it’s all politics

It’s not all politics. It’s about capabilities. Qatar was exposed for trying to improve their image in the west. Now that is politics. But what China has achieved and what Arab nations haven’t isn’t politics. It’s capability.

 

[miserycel]

It’s not all politics. It’s about capabilities. Qatar was exposed for trying to improve their image in the west. Now that is politics. But what China has achieved and what Arab nations haven’t isn’t politics. It’s capability.

China didn’t have a Jewish parasite instilled in Tibet + Every communist nation around China was invaded (Vietnam , Korea) except for China simply because China fundamentally was too hard to invade due to its massive geographical and demographic size

The Middle East on the other hand had an artificial Jewish parasite state instilled with the intention of rapidly expanding, and they also controlled the markets which the west was so dependent on but didn’t have any sort of geographic or demographic leverage to waver on, all they could do was use their economic leverage to remain powerful but any leader who did that (ie. king Faisal al saud) was simply assassinated


History and politics was always pitted against the Arabs, culturally and historically China is irrelevant

 

[Gengar’s Ghost]

China didn’t have a Jewish parasite instilled in Tibet + Every communist nation around China was invaded (Vietnam , Korea) except for China simply because China fundamentally was too hard to invade due to its massive geographical and demographic size

The Middle East on the other hand had an artificial Jewish parasite state instilled with the intention of rapidly expanding, and they also controlled the markets which the west was so dependent on but didn’t have any sort of geographic or demographic leverage to waver on, all they could do was use their economic leverage to remain powerful but any leader who did that (ie. king Faisal al saud) was simply assassinated


History and politics was always pitted against the Arabs, culturally and historically China is irrelevant

China is neither culturally or historically irrelevant. Not sure what your beef is with China, but they are far superior to any Middle Eastern nation. The proof is that China is a superpower and Middle Eastern nations aren’t.

 

[miserycel]

China is neither culturally or historically irrelevant. Not sure what your beef is with China, but they are far superior to any Middle Eastern nation. The proof is that China is a superpower and Middle Eastern nations aren’t.

Throughout history yes they are, obviously they have relevance but what I mean is in the grand schemes of what led to the current geopolitical climate today, their region isn’t anywhere near as relevant as the Middle East. And of course China is superior, I’m not denying that. I’m arguing against your point that gooks > Arabs because “they’re more developed” because it simply is not as simple and shallow as you make it seem

 

[Gengar’s Ghost]

Throughout history yes they are, obviously they have relevance but what I mean is in the grand schemes of what led to the current geopolitical climate today, their region isn’t anywhere near as relevant as the Middle East. And of course China is superior, I’m not denying that. I’m arguing against your point that gooks > Arabs because “they’re more developed” because it simply is not as simple and shallow as you make it seem

Basically just arguing for the sake of arguing then. Anyway, I don’t see how Israel can be used as a scapegoat. That only works for Palestine, but you were arguing for the entirety of the Levant. Part of the Levant, by the way, engages in trade with Israel. Trade worth billions. Not sure if you knew.

 

[miserycel]

Basically just arguing for the sake of arguing then. Anyway, I don’t see how Israel can be used as a scapegoat. That only works for Palestine, but you were arguing for the entirety of the Levant. Part of the Levant, by the way, engages in trade with Israel. Trade worth billions. Not sure if you knew.

Israel already took Golan Heights from Syria, they’ve attacked Yemen, Iran and even invaded Southern Lebanon and even were condemned by Daddy US for it. They’ve already made threats towards Egypt and if you followed geopolitics you’d know that they’re scaling up tensions to start a war with Turkey. They’ve destabilised the entire region, unequivocally.

Once again, it’s just shallow asf, saying Israel’s existence only harms Palestine

 

[Gengar’s Ghost]

Israel already took Golan Heights from Syria, they’ve attacked Yemen, Iran and even invaded Southern Lebanon and even were condemned by Daddy US for it. They’ve already made threats towards Egypt and if you followed geopolitics you’d know that they’re scaling up tensions to start a war with Turkey. They’ve destabilised the entire region, unequivocally.

Once again, it’s just shallow asf, saying Israel’s existence only harms Palestine

What is truly shallow is you putting words in my mouth. In any case, it’s a weak argument to begin with because nations are still able to prosper if they have the capabilities to do so. It’s clear that none of those nations have the capability. Not to mention, throughout the world there are more countries that can’t stand one another, but their development isn’t necessarily stalled by their existences.

 

[miserycel]

What is truly shallow is you putting words in my mouth. In any case, it’s a weak argument to begin with because nations are still able to prosper if they have the capabilities to do so. It’s clear that none of those nations have the capability. Not to mention, throughout the world there are more countries that can’t stand one another, but their development isn’t necessarily stalled by their existences.

“I don’t see how Israel can be used as a scapegoat of Middle Eastern destabilisation, that only works for Palestine”

*Talks about how they have negatively affected the whole area*

“Don’t put words in my mouth” lol

Yes Arab countries can still prosper with the right capabilities, it’s why the Gulf has done amazingly well for themselves with their use of oil whilst still being in the same unstable region. Would you like to explain how none of these Middle Eastern nations have the capabilities to prosper?