prenatal t and digit ratio is cope

Hekt0r

Hekt0r

Bronze
Joined
May 19, 2019
Posts
389
Reputation
350
pics all the same person
 

Attachments

  • 20190219_141654_1.jpg
    20190219_141654_1.jpg
    80.8 KB · Views: 87
  • 20190818_185812.jpg
    20190818_185812.jpg
    65.6 KB · Views: 87
  • Snapchat-431328963-1.jpg
    Snapchat-431328963-1.jpg
    62.4 KB · Views: 85
???? did you fcking inject estro or why did you turn into a fcking female
 
not me, some discord tranny
 
jfl his hand mogs my dick
 
low hairline
low gonial
compact midface
good fwhr

not cope
 
  • +1
Reactions: Nosecel9000 and Deleted member 685
Digit ratio has been debunked as far as androgen exposure in the womb
 
low hairline
low gonial
compact midface
good fwhr

not cope
This
OP is retarded

Also I love how retards here cherrypick trying to disprove stuff when things like these are heavily well researched.

Keep coping, faggot
Digit ratio has been debunked as far as androgen exposure in the womb
No it literally hasn't
 
This
OP is retarded

Also I love how retards here cherrypick trying to disprove stuff when things like these are heavily well researched.

Keep coping, faggot

No it literally hasn't
The only long study done where they actually tested the umbilical cord hormone levels and digit ratio showed it had no correlation
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 685
Is this a girl?
 
The only long study done where they actually tested the umbilical cord hormone levels and digit ratio showed it had no correlation
This is literally RETARDED
 
This is literally RETARDED
I mean it’s fact, yes study’s has shown it’s correlated with high prental T but studies that actually tested the umbilical cord said it’s not. I have a good digit ratio I’m just saying the legitimate studies don’t support it
 
I mean it’s fact, yes study’s has shown it’s correlated with high prental T but studies that actually tested the umbilical cord said it’s not
Please show me the study about the umbilical cord and 2d4d ratio. Also it's too complicated to come up with conclusions like that. It's too complicated to know at which stages androgen exposure impacts which parts of the body. Different stages occur where different parts of the body (and face) develop.
 
Please show me the study about the umbilical cord and 2d4d ratio. Also it's too complicated to come up with conclusions like that. It's too complicated to know at which stages androgen exposure impacts which parts of the body. Different stages occur where different parts of the body (and face) develop.

I know this is just one study and there’s plenty saying it is correlated but when they actually measure it, it doesn’t correlate
 

I know this is just one study and there’s plenty saying it is correlated but when they actually measure it, it doesn’t correlate
Outcome measures
Cord serum samples were collected immediately after delivery. Samples were assayed for androgen (testosterone, Δ4-androstenedione, dehydroepiandrosterone) and estrogen (estrone, estradiol, estriol, estetrol) concentrations using liquid-chromatography mass-spectrometry. Digit ratio measurements were taken from hand photocopies at age 19–22 years.

What they fail to realize is that androgen serum levels AREN'T NECESSARILY THE SAME at the moment of birth. There wouldn't be a reason for this either considering most of the masculinization of the fetus takes place around 14-25 weeks. And that's a far stretch.
I'm sorry, but this is really shitty and short study. The fetus already starts producing testosterone after 10 weeks of pregnancy, so there's no way to simply tell just from cord serum examples.
 
Outcome measures
Cord serum samples were collected immediately after delivery. Samples were assayed for androgen (testosterone, Δ4-androstenedione, dehydroepiandrosterone) and estrogen (estrone, estradiol, estriol, estetrol) concentrations using liquid-chromatography mass-spectrometry. Digit ratio measurements were taken from hand photocopies at age 19–22 years.

What they fail to realize is that androgen serum levels AREN'T NECESSARILY THE SAME at the moment of birth. There wouldn't be a reason for this either considering most of the masculinization of the fetus takes place around 14-25 weeks. And that's a far stretch.
I'm sorry, but this is really shitty and short study. The fetus already starts producing testosterone after 10 weeks of pregnancy, so there's no way to simply tell just from cord serum examples.
Is that true, it’s not the same at birth, I honestly don’t know
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rspb.2015.1351

Another study that used umbilical cord data, showing umbilical cord androgen does have an affect on facial development but digit ratio wasn’t an accurate measurement of androgen exposure
This study took blood samples From 16-20 weeks so not at birth
 
Last edited:
Low pubertal t and high life e can turn people into trannies easily
 

Similar threads

mandiblade
Replies
12
Views
443
übermog
übermog
A
Replies
3
Views
62
Anime Groyper
A
imabetanumale
Replies
10
Views
170
learningstuff
L
looks>books
Replies
3
Views
58
looks>books
looks>books
thedarkoverlord_666
Replies
4
Views
62
thedarkoverlord_666
thedarkoverlord_666

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top