Pressing questions that blackpill hasn't been able to answer? (looks-dating wise)

[enchanted_elixir]

Does anyone have any of them?

 

[Deleted member 25938]

Is the bluepill legit?

 

[Deleted member 18544]

Why do niggers exist?

 

[ElBastardo]

Is the bluepill legit?

Yeah, you're right. It's pretty funny.

 

[Broly]

why hasnt india been nuked yet

 

[Deleted member 17791]

Oofy doofy pill

 

[Prettyboy]

A few out of my head

- Male gaze paradox - too much male dimorphism is detrimental to SMV

to this, an other one is related, the

- Black male SMV paradox - their SMV is out of sync with their PSL

- Roastie paradox - women’s standards toward men increase as they age while their SMV simultanously drops, leaving roasties with exponentially worse price value ratio compared to young virgins

related to the Roastie paradox, the

- Female settling paradox - although women know their SMV decreases with every year following their puberty, instead of giving birth to a chads offsprings early on, they instead wait until they can only secure a beta male’s seed. This doesn’t make sense from game theory perspective

- Steroid abuse paradox - the guys with naturally low androgen levels would benefit the most from using steroids but because of their natural hormone levels they lack the risk taking drive

 

[enchanted_elixir]

Roastie paradox - women’s standards toward men increase as they age while their SMV simultanously drops, leaving roasties with exponentially worse price value ratio compared to young virgins

I can answer this with what I believe to be true. Women with more experience are more selective. Their SMV decline doesn't change their standards. They're just forced (sooner or later) to sacrifice their standards to get a partner.

 

[enchanted_elixir]

- Female settling paradox - although women know their SMV decreases with every year following their puberty, instead of giving birth to a chads offsprings early on, they instead wait until they can only secure a beta male’s seed. This doesn’t make sense from game theory perspective

They don't want to be single mothers. At least with a beta male, you aren't a single mother and you have an income and a father for your child.

 

[enchanted_elixir]

- Steroid abuse paradox - the guys with naturally low androgen levels would benefit the most from using steroids but because of their natural hormone levels they lack the risk taking drive

Testosterone is a hormone that signals the production of dopamine.
Dopamine drives motivation.
Low baseline dopamine levels lead to low motivation.

A study on rats showed that when they genetically engineered rats incapable of making dopamine, they weren't motivated to do anything. They weren't motivated to move, eat, drink water, etc.

The scientists had to feed them with substances containing dopamine precursors to do anything. They died after three weeks due to dopamine-deficiency-induced hyper-laziness. (Mark S. Szczypka, Mark A. Rainey, Douglas S. Kim, William A. Alaynick, Brett T. Marck, Alvin M. Matsumoto, Richard D. Palmiter, 1999)

Study: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC18425/

 

[enchanted_elixir]

Male gaze paradox - too much male dimorphism is detrimental to SMV

My theory is that too much dimorphism looks abnormal, or it destroys your hair and skin, leading you to lose SMV.

 

[enchanted_elixir]

Black male SMV paradox - their SMV is out of sync with their PSL

This is the only one that I don't have definitive theory or answer for.

 

[Prettyboy]

They don't want to be single mothers. At least with a beta male, you aren't a single mother and you have an income and a father for your child.

This is based on the assumption the chad would leave them, which isn’t necessarily the case. They have sky high SMV at that time (let’s say 18 yo) thus many guys would be happy to give them children and stick around to estabilish a family (both guys their age and older, more experimented men)

Even if this isn’t the case and the guy leaves, as a 18 year old single mother she still has very high SMV and could easily get a beta male just like she could if she stayed childless until 33 yo

This way she would have chad’s kid and a beta male, which is preferable to no mogger offspring and still ending up with the beta male in the end

 

[Acne Victim]

- Steroid abuse paradox - the guys with naturally low androgen levels would benefit the most from using steroids but because of their natural hormone levels they lack the risk taking drive

Roids aren't worth it though regardless of the risk. It is just a multiplier, if you are a subhuman to begin with nothing will change

 

[enchanted_elixir]

This is based on the assumption the chad would leave them, which isn’t necessarily the case. They have sky high SMV at that time (let’s say 18 yo) thus many guys would be happy to give them children and stick around to estabilish a family (both guys their age and older, more experimented men)

Even if this isn’t the case and the guy leaves, as a 18 year old single mother she still has very high SMV and could easily get a beta male just like she could if she stayed childless until 33 yo

A woman's thoughts influence a woman's behavior. If she assumes Chad will leave her, she'll won't risk being a single mother, regardless if this is the case or not.

Also, I think many chads are only interested in fucking. Many women know this.

 

[enchanted_elixir]

Roids aren't worth it though regardless of the risk. It is just a multiplier, if you are a subhuman to begin with nothing will change

At least you'll be more motivated, a huge plus.

 

[Acne Victim]

At least you'll be more motivated, a huge plus.

I wouldn't be motivated to lose all my beautiful hair and to age quicker...

 

[HarrierDuBois]

My theory is that too much dimorphism looks abnormal, or it destroys your hair and skin, leading you to lose SMV.

Reason women like men with balanced feminine and masculine features is simple. Their children will be attractive both as sons and daughters. Google Brock Lesnar (a very masc man) daughter. Then compare that to the children of Lachowski.

 

[Deleted member 25938]

Another possible paradox:

The line between objective and subjective attractiveness: it is undecided at what point, if there is such a point, that the subjective, niche-based perceptions of attractiveness override the more objective/PSL-based metrics. While there might be a point of diminishing returns (e.g., after chadlite looks become "subjective"), this question itself ends up becoming a manifestation of the objective/subjective axiom in the first place.

 

[enchanted_elixir]

Another possible paradox:

The line between objective and subjective attractiveness: it is undecided at what point, if there is such a point, that the subjective, niche-based perceptions of attractiveness override the more objective/PSL-based metrics. While there might be a point of diminishing returns (e.g., after chadlite looks become "subjective"), this question itself ends up becoming a manifestation of the objective/subjective axiom in the first place.

Definitely a great one, thanks for mentioning!

 

[Deleted member 19453]

why can't I get a girlfriend

 

[enchanted_elixir]

why can't I get a girlfriend

you're ugly or your pheno is undesirable.

 

[Prettyboy]

Also, I think many chads are only interested in fucking. Many women know this.

We only have 1-1 biological goal while living on this planet, for us men its breeding as many women as possible, for women its getting pregnant by the highest value male possible

It doesn’t matter if she becomes a single mother at 18 if she got pregnant by chad, biologically speaking she has done her duty, she won the race. The state will support her financially anyways and she can easily use a beta male for his resources as well

If I was a woman it would be a no brainer for me. If a chad would only want to fuck then leave me, then be it. I could have his seed and my kid would be better of than if I were to wait a decade for a beta male who is willing to stay around

 

[Prettyboy]

Roids aren't worth it though regardless of the risk. It is just a multiplier, if you are a subhuman to begin with nothing will change

There’s certainly a looks level low enough which enables pursuing roids a possibly rational choice over not doing so

Arguably the biggest ascension this site have seen was @loox’s , which fits this above situation well

 

[enchanted_elixir]

There’s certainly a looks level low enough which enables pursuing roids a possibly rational choice over not doing so

Arguably the biggest ascension this site have seen was @loox’s , which fits this above situation well

How many points?

 

[Deleted member 25667]

Why do I have 5.7 inch wrists?

 

[Deleted member 25667]

How important is being NT when it comes to
1) Long term relationships
2) One night stands (slaying)
3) Casual short term flings (fwbs)

 

[Prettyboy]

My theory is that too much dimorphism looks abnormal, or it destroys your hair and skin, leading you to lose SMV.

How do you explain black male SMV then?

They are known to be the most dimorphic group on average, yet dating site’s statistics regularly conclude them having the second highest SMV

If ogreism is severe handicap in other races SMV, why isn’t it in black men’s case?

 

[letsdoit]

There’s certainly a looks level low enough which enables pursuing roids a possibly rational choice over not doing so

Arguably the biggest ascension this site have seen was @loox’s , which fits this above situation well

How did he keep his hair and everything fine? Any idea what he ran? I’m in a similair boat to his before

 

[letsdoit]

A few out of my head

- Male gaze paradox - too much male dimorphism is detrimental to SMV

to this, an other one is related, the

- Black male SMV paradox - their SMV is out of sync with their PSL

- Roastie paradox - women’s standards toward men increase as they age while their SMV simultanously drops, leaving roasties with exponentially worse price value ratio compared to young virgins

related to the Roastie paradox, the

- Female settling paradox - although women know their SMV decreases with every year following their puberty, instead of giving birth to a chads offsprings early on, they instead wait until they can only secure a beta male’s seed. This doesn’t make sense from game theory perspective

- Steroid abuse paradox - the guys with naturally low androgen levels would benefit the most from using steroids but because of their natural hormone levels they lack the risk taking drive

For the Steroid abuse paradox, What is considered a low androgen levels for a 20 yr old male, I struggle with the drive 100% and just got my bloodwork checked
If you can pm me i’d be willing to pay you to help me go over it

 

[p0lishsubhuman]

We only have 1-1 biological goal while living on this planet, for us men its breeding as many women as possible, for women its getting pregnant by the highest value male possible

It doesn’t matter if she becomes a single mother at 18 if she got pregnant by chad, biologically speaking she has done her duty, she won the race. The state will support her financially anyways and she can easily use a beta male for his resources as well

If I was a woman it would be a no brainer for me. If a chad would only want to fuck then leave me, then be it. I could have his seed and my kid would be better of than if I were to wait a decade for a beta male who is willing to stay around

Ive always thought that the goal for women is locking up a chad, which means getting impregnated by chad AND having him raise the kids

Thats why they often settle for getting impregnated by a beta and the beta raising the kids

 

[Lawton88]

Ive always thought that the goal for women is locking up a chad, which means getting impregnated by chad AND having him raise the kids

Thats why they often settle for getting impregnated by a beta and the beta raising the kids

Many want to party and do career thing until 30 while screwing Chads and then lock one down for LTR and child at 30+ and find out the few Chads left at that age want younger females for LTR. It's why you see many of the career ones either settle for a Beta nearing 30 years old or they eventually become the old cat lady crying about Chadlites not committing to them.

 

[Deleted member 15674]

A few out of my head

- Male gaze paradox - too much male dimorphism is detrimental to SMV

to this, an other one is related, the

- Black male SMV paradox - their SMV is out of sync with their PSL

- Roastie paradox - women’s standards toward men increase as they age while their SMV simultanously drops, leaving roasties with exponentially worse price value ratio compared to young virgins

related to the Roastie paradox, the

- Female settling paradox - although women know their SMV decreases with every year following their puberty, instead of giving birth to a chads offsprings early on, they instead wait until they can only secure a beta male’s seed. This doesn’t make sense from game theory perspective

- Steroid abuse paradox - the guys with naturally low androgen levels would benefit the most from using steroids but because of their natural hormone levels they lack the risk taking drive

MGP :- Humans select for norms, not extreme. A good example of this being in other animals. I forgot the species, but there is a bird which has v colourful feathers. Females will select for the more colour birds, however because they're more colourful they're more easily spotted and therefore die. Whereas the less colourful birds are unattractive -> they aren't spotted but aren't desired. So the selection is to the norm in this case. Male dimorphism is test based, too much test and you will have health issues, hence women select for a healthy avg.

BBc paradox - media halo tbh. I can't say much for that.

RP:- Women are solipsistic, at that point they're not looking for hookups but lifepartners. Their drop in value has no bearing in what they select for.

FSP:- It's due to the advent of BC. If BC/contraceptives weren't a thing, women would not be able to be as "sneaky" with their mate selection.

SAP:- The effects of test are dependent on androgen receptor sensitivity too, if your sensitiivity is shit, injecting test won't do much.

 

[Skywalker]

Oofy doofy pill

deleted member= roped