Pretty boys are a mistake in nature

[KT-34]

Attractiveness is supposed to be like a radar for strong genetics for survival, like men are attracted to women's curves because it indicates fertility

Women should in theory be attracted to the most masculine looking men possible, yet somehow wires got crossed and women are attracted to men with very soft features that go against what the purpose of attractiveness is

I don't complain cause I myself have very soft features but it's objectively a glitch in nature that women are attracted to pretty boys

 

[KT-34]

Why is the site so fucking slow today

 

[chadhamed]

This site feels fast

 

[KT-34]

This site feels fast

It was glitching earlier thought we were getting Ddosed

 

[xlimz]

Women are naturally attracted to the most natural men, not necessarily the most masculine

 

[jaaba]

Attractiveness is supposed to be like a radar for strong genetics for survival, like men are attracted to women's curves because it indicates fertility

Women should in theory be attracted to the most masculine looking men possible, yet somehow wires got crossed and women are attracted to men with very soft features that go against what the purpose of attractiveness is

I don't complain cause I myself have very soft features but it's objectively a glitch in nature that women are attracted to pretty boys

Most pretty boys are quite dimorphic they just have good health markers and dress a certain way too

 

[silently_said]

Most pretty boys are white dimorphic they just have good health markers and dress a certain way too

Exactly, Cavill was a prettyboy when young

 

[KT-34]

Exactly, Cavill was a prettyboy when young

That's true but his bone structure as he grew up

 

[KT-34]

Most pretty boys are white dimorphic they just have good health markers and dress a certain way too

I mean yeah you gotta have some level of dimorphism to be attractive, even bjorn who is the peak of pretty boys atleast looks like a guy


But you'd think more dimorphism = more attractiveness but it's not necessarily the case when it should've been from an evolutionary aspect

 

[jaaba]

I mean yeah you gotta have some level of dimorphism to be attractive, even bjorn who is the peak of pretty boys atleast looks like a guy


But you'd think more dimorphism = more attractiveness but it's not necessarily the case when it should've been from an evolutionary aspect

It’s a bell curve with dimorphism level and attraction I think. Form what I’ve heard as women mature their attraction to higher levels of dimorphism increases

 

[ICXCLuvr]

Attractiveness is supposed to be like a radar for strong genetics for survival

well this isn’t the stone age and the industrial revolution happened centuries ago so adapt

 

[KT-34]

It’s a bell curve with dimorphism level and attraction I think. Form what I’ve heard as women mature their attraction to higher levels of dimorphism increases

I assumed it was more because men their age can't look "pretty"

 

[jaaba]

I assumed it was more because men their age can't look "pretty"

Good point

 

[IHATEINDIANS]

Most of them have at least a few masculine features as well as slightly feminine ones. I imagine the main reason is it signals youth, which, generally means fertility peak (although fertility signals matter much less more in men than women), which seems to appeal to other high fertility youthful women (not many roasties are attracted to prettyboys compared to young women). Youthfulness might also signal more energy and strength. Not sure at all though

 

[PrettyLights]

I think you’re mistaking cutecels for pretty boys you absolute fucking donut

 

[KT-34]

I think you’re mistaking cutecels for pretty boys you absolute fucking donut

Cutecel are ugly and lack dimorphism, pretty boys just lack dimorphism or have enough soft features

That's how I see it

 

[GodDeityEyeBro]

I mean yeah you gotta have some level of dimorphism to be attractive, even bjorn who is the peak of pretty boys atleast looks like a guy


But you'd think more dimorphism = more attractiveness but it's not necessarily the case when it should've been from an evolutionary aspect

More dimorphsim means more test which also means more agression + more tendency to abandon your child so you can argue from this aspect as well. The balanced stuff you see with prettyboys + robust prettyboys is like the perfect option tbh. But also, you need to understand that most prettyboys get mistaken for just young youthful chads with long hair (Chico is an example) and that humans if left alone operate off a sexual selection mating system. It's like deer who grow long antlers because does liking them eventually causing death or the feathers of a peacock. Perhaps less advantages overall but in the metagame of dating it will ensure that they can reproduce, winning nature in the end.

Cutecel are ugly and lack dimorphism, pretty boys just lack dimorphism or have enough soft features

That's how I see it

You can analyze beauty as being a metagame system really. A Prettyboy may lack some dimorphsim compared to some ultramasculine attractive guy but they usually have more dimorphism and traits then the redpill copers and the people who are gymcels. Also, beauty has the factor of causing others to not respect you if your a man sure, but it may also let you also be underestimated. Either way though, if we assume that the goal of life is to reproduce, a prettyboy is going to be on the same level as an ultramasculine chad or any really attractive person. It's just that simple. Survival with the idea of fighting to the death or wild animal killing is something that won't really change that much if your ultramasculine, high test, so long as you have good enough test stuff. If this was the case, I would be expecting an ultramasculine guy to be 1v10ing randos, but I haven't seen that irl