Pretty boys look better in motion because of harmony.

OneTwoThree

OneTwoThree

Everyone will be ugly sooner or later.
Joined
Mar 3, 2022
Posts
1,315
Reputation
1,727
Masculine guys may look better in photos but they rely on heavily on lighting and good angle. IRL harmony is a key to look great no matter if someone sees your front, face profile, 3/4, bad head tilt etc.

Masculine guys have big jaws but they lack compact midface, also they often have avarege eyes area.

Pretty boys might not having huge bones but they look great independently from angles.



O' Pry has ideal male model look to be photographed but IRL he does not look as stunning as we see him on magazine covers.

On the other hand Lachowski has ideal maxilla, midface, jaw, profile etc. Barrett, Gandy may be looking better and more unique in modeling shots but when it comes to ,,ordinary day'' every person in bus, office , tram, street would claim Chico must be a male model if they saw him and did not know who he is. Look at this movie where he is surrounded by girls. You see him in shit lightning, from many angles and he absolutely stands out from the crowd.


 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: lightskinbengali, Deleted member 27472, Looks234 and 4 others
ehhh, this one

 
  • JFL
Reactions: Zikel_Nut, Deleted member 48903, ๕ඞChick3ncu1ry and 3 others
thats simply not true, and this is coming from someone who is partial to chico, always.

o'pry and Barrett would fucking MOG in terms model recognition when just chilling in the train or at the gym.

thats not saying they look better. but their features strike and dazzle so much more than chico.

also, its just perception in that video. hes taller than everyone and they're all making him the center/surrounding him. no shit hes gonna stand out.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Zikel_Nut, SurgeryEnjoyer, Allornothing and 1 other person
3E5C005C 77F9 4ED1 ADCF D7B6746E6FF4


This pic alone disproved ur whole post
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Zikel_Nut, Av0nr and (deleted member)
You've got it the wrong way around. Harmony matters a lot for the frontal angle. In real life people rarely look at your face perfectly straight on as it is motion a lot of the time. Harmony matters more for frontal stills than anything else. In motion people can't get a perfect look at your ratios etc.
 
You've got it the wrong way around. Harmony matters a lot for the frontal angle. In real life people rarely look at your face perfectly straight on as it is motion a lot of the time. Harmony matters more for frontal stills than anything else. In motion people can't get a perfect look at your ratios etc.
I meant you can be very good looking but only doing one pose in certian tilt and certain angle depending on great lighting. This manuevers can hide your falios and underline your strong advantages but IRL people see you from many angles.

Pretty boys have great harmony that is why they look great no matter whether they turn and tilt theirs head up, down, left, right.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Blackgymmax and Xangsane
This is the dumbest take I've ever heard. Mike Thurston looks amazing in motion and has great harmony and appeal mogs these retarded pretty boy femboys
 
  • +1
Reactions: Zikel_Nut, Supreme, Av0nr and 1 other person
Masculine guys may look better in photos but they rely on heavily on lighting and good angle. IRL harmony is a key to look great no matter if someone sees your front, face profile, 3/4, bad head tilt etc.

Masculine guys have big jaws but they lack compact midface, also they often have avarege eyes area.

Pretty boys might not having huge bones but they look great independently from angles.



O' Pry has ideal male model look to be photographed but IRL he does not look as stunning as we see him on magazine covers.

On the other hand Lachowski has ideal maxilla, midface, jaw, profile etc. Barrett, Gandy may be looking better and more unique in modeling shots but when it comes to ,,ordinary day'' every person in bus, office , tram, street would claim Chico must be a male model if they saw him and did not know who he is. Look at this movie where he is surrounded by girls. You see him in shit lightning, from many angles and he absolutely stands out from the crowd.



he looks like larsanova and rodeblur had a baby together
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Xangsane
you're saying that masc men have lower psl when that's not the case
Pretty boys are lower psl. Thats why they dont look as masculine. Psl Is a measure of dimorphism.
2 you need to go into the real world lol even a mediocre masc high htn clobbers these pretty boys irl
 
  • +1
Reactions: temporomandibular32, Looks234 and Xangsane
Fuckng crisck looks better than this guy 500x in motion retard
 
You've got it the wrong way around. Harmony matters a lot for the frontal angle. In real life people rarely look at your face perfectly straight on as it is motion a lot of the time. Harmony matters more for frontal stills than anything else. In motion people can't get a perfect look at your ratios etc.
Women still get your frontal bruh. Once you talk to them they'll judge your frontal and if it's not good it's gg.
 
Pretty boys are lower psl. Thats why they dont look as masculine. Psl Is a measure of dimorphism.
2 you need to go into the real world lol even a mediocre masc high htn clobbers these pretty boys irl
That’s why I think Chico is overrated
 
  • +1
Reactions: Xangsane and Blackgymmax
Women still get your frontal bruh. Once you talk to them they'll judge your frontal and if it's not good it's gg.
so you think side profile doesnt matter?
 
Women still get your frontal bruh. Once you talk to them they'll judge your frontal and if it's not good it's gg.
I know I just mean you can get away with minor ratio flaws in motion which are exposed more obviously on a passport pic or frontal pic.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Blackgymmax
I know I just mean you can get away with minor ratio flaws in motion which are exposed more obviously on a passport pic or frontal pic.
No you can't lol. I can tell you from my own experience when I got repulsed by a girl with a jaw slightly too big for her temples but in her 3 4ths and side she looks good
 
No you can't lol. I can tell you from my own experience when I got repulsed by a girl with a jaw slightly too big for her temples but in her 3 4ths and side she looks good
That's because BP has rotted your brain.

In real life people get a composite view of your attractiveness based on frontal, 3/4, side profile and multiple angles (if you are tall then looking down on a girl) etc. So if your midface ratio and ESR aren't perfect etc from a pure frontal non-angle frauded perspective you can mitigate that with the different angles.

If you post one frontal pic on Tinder (which let's face it is what women look for) that's all they go off.
 
  • Ugh..
  • +1
Reactions: OneTwoThree and Blackgymmax
That's because BP has rotted your brain.

In real life people get a composite view of your attractiveness based on frontal, 3/4, side profile and multiple angles (if you are tall then looking down on a girl) etc. So if your midface ratio and ESR aren't perfect etc from a pure non-angle frauded perspective you can mitigate that with the different angles.
No it didn't you fuck face. My gut feeling was "ew"
But I could tell what was doing it because of BP knowledge
 
This is the dumbest take I've ever heard. Mike Thurston looks amazing in motion and has great harmony and appeal mogs these retarded pretty boy femboys
impressive how retarded and out of reality u are
 
That's because BP has rotted your brain.

In real life people get a composite view of your attractiveness based on frontal, 3/4, side profile and multiple angles (if you are tall then looking down on a girl) etc. So if your midface ratio and ESR aren't perfect etc from a pure frontal non-angle frauded perspective you can mitigate that with the different angles.

If you post one frontal pic on Tinder (which let's face it is what women look for) that's all they go off.
All irl slayers have a good frontal
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member
No it didn't you fuck face. My gut feeling was "ew"
But I could tell what was doing it because of BP knowledge
Incorrect. I have become much more aware of flaws even from a gut perspective since discovering BP. I never felt disgusted by mild ESR imperfections until I learned more about it.
 
All irl slayers have a good frontal
You do realize you have 0.51 ESR and long middle third? If you need perfect frontal ratios to slay you're kind of fucked.
 
Incorrect. I have become much more aware of flaws even from a gut perspective since discovering BP. I never felt disgusted by mild ESR imperfections until I learned more about it.
Bruh it wasn't just me retard. A bunch of my normie irls thought the exact same but they couldn't tell what it was. Stop being fucking stupid and take the black pill
 
T. Basement dwelling incel who gets 0 girls
you can have no doubt i attracted way more girls than u, but it doesnt matter, your argument is still of a retarded who keeps posting the entire day
 
You do realize you have 0.51 ESR and long middle third? If you need perfect frontal ratios to slay you're kind of fucked.
It's .5 which is acceptable for my pheno retard. Every nigerian tyrone has an ES between .5 and .48 which includes musaka. I don't have perfect ratios as I'm no chad however OVERALL IM THE WHOLE PACKAGE THAT MOGS. Unfortunately in her case she's fucked with that uncanny wide jaw
 
It's .5 which is acceptable for my pheno retard. I don't have perfect ratios as I'm no chad however OVERALL IM THE WHOLE PACKAGE THAT MOGS. Unfortunately in her case she's fucked with that uncanny wide jaw
0.46 is ideal, If you're black you can go up to 0.47-0.48 and still be ideal. 0.5 is too high stop coping. Then you tell me to swallow the black-pill...
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Blackgymmax
0.46 is standard, If you're black you can go up to 0.47-0.48 and still be ideal. 0.5 is too high stop coping. Then you tell me to swallow the black-pill...
No lol every dark-skinned slayer I've ran had a .48-51 musaka Tyson Beckford various dark male models etc. It's because of the side nose and blacks would need Asian tier zygos to compensate. There is a guy on here with .47 with this exactly but he looks retarded.
 
you can have no doubt i attracted way more girls than u, but it doesnt matter, your argument is still of a retarded who keeps posting the entire day
No u haven't lol. Most of the forum claims this but they're like 3/10s lol
 
0.46 is ideal, If you're black you can go up to 0.47-0.48 and still be ideal. 0.5 is too high stop coping. Then you tell me to swallow the black-pill...
Even obed has a .5 lol
Screenshot 20230811 174821 ImageMeter
 
Selfies increase one es ratio. A true 0.5 es ratio would look like a hammerhead shark
No they don't and no it doesn't on blacks due to 1 eye breadth ratio (more pfl) and nose width.
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Deleted member 43403
thats simply not true, and this is coming from someone who is partial to chico, always.

o'pry and Barrett would fucking MOG in terms model recognition when just chilling in the train or at the gym.

thats not saying they look better. but their features strike and dazzle so much more than chico.

also, its just perception in that video. hes taller than everyone and they're all making him the center/surrounding him. no shit hes gonna stand out.
I agree with you, but @HarrierDuBois begs to differ.
 
  • +1
Reactions: HarrierDuBois
I agree with you, but @HarrierDuBois begs to differ.
I don't beg to differ. Chico is undeniably very boring which is why he is not striking but extremely appealing. Looks main character but won't necissarily stand out in a crowd at first glance.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Zikel_Nut and SurgeryEnjoyer

Similar threads

Xx_gloomy_bison_xX
Replies
4
Views
222
Acne Victim
Acne Victim
androgenic
Replies
70
Views
2K
looksmaxxed
looksmaxxed
h7vy
Replies
16
Views
4K
TheBiggestIncelEver
TheBiggestIncelEver

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top