soyence
Primal diet is beneficial to looksmaxing progress so silence soy boy
“yea I love risking disease for functionally zero nutritional benefit”
one word just destroyed all of soyence
Where do you source your information from? When you cook your meat, you're creating carcinogend and exogenous AGEs, that just risks cancer potential, and bind to your collagen. Eating your meat raw will also be more efficiently digestible, and consume more nutrients (which has been proven in several studies).
I also know several people who consume raw meats, eggs, and milk, who are in a much healthier and happier state, hasn't got ill once.
You're providing no information whatsoever, except for your personal tiktok knowledge.
Most plasma AGEs are produced endogenously. 10% or less of dietary AGEs are even absorbed anyway. (source) Some diets low in AGEs result in high serum AGEs and vice versa (source ) Additionally, fatty meat (even raw) contains significantly more AGEs than most cooked food anyway (source)
Aaand disproven by a quick google search
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
"We found cooking to decrease SDA by 12.7%, grinding to decrease SDA by 12.4%"Most plasma AGEs are produced endogenously. 10% or less of dietary AGEs are even absorbed anyway. (source) Some diets low in AGEs result in high serum AGEs and vice versa (source ) Additionally, fatty meat (even raw) contains significantly more AGEs than most cooked food anyway (source)
Aaand disproven by a quick google search
Cooking and grinding reduces the cost of meat digestion - PubMed
The cooking of food is hypothesized to have played a major role in human evolution partly by providing an increase in net energy gain. For meat, cooking compromises the structural integrity of the tissue by gelatinizing the collagen. Hence, cooked meat should take less effort to digest compared...
"in which the AGE contents of foods were detected with different cooking methods, instead of roasting, grilling and frying, with appropriate culinary techniques including low temperature and high moisture such as stewing, poaching and boiling, low AGE levels can easily be achieved in the foods" so lower temperature achieves lower AGE levels.Most plasma AGEs are produced endogenously. 10% or less of dietary AGEs are even absorbed anyway. (source) Some diets low in AGEs result in high serum AGEs and vice versa (source ) Additionally, fatty meat (even raw) contains significantly more AGEs than most cooked food anyway (source)
Aaand disproven by a quick google search
Cooking and grinding reduces the cost of meat digestion - PubMed
The cooking of food is hypothesized to have played a major role in human evolution partly by providing an increase in net energy gain. For meat, cooking compromises the structural integrity of the tissue by gelatinizing the collagen. Hence, cooked meat should take less effort to digest compared...
Yet cooked food has a worser effect on ages than raw does, so what's your point? You cant get any diseases from raw meat,and like I mentioned before, cooked has an increased risk on cancer because of the carcinogens and ages. Raw meat is simply easier digested, will improve your stool and overall health. There's no denying It
Another thing, it depends on the source. If it's from a supermarket, higher chances it will be infected. Which is why everyome gets their meat from a farmers market.
If you cared about ages you wouldn’t eat red meat. It’s just virtue signaling.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
already disproved with earlier message
Cooking ground beef and pork has been studied to reduce the total free amino acid content https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1983.tb14859.xIf you cared about ages you wouldn’t eat red meat. It’s just virtue signaling.
Obviously this is untrue, cooking meat kills bacteria. Not sure why I even have to disprove thisExposure to Toxoplasma gondii Through Consumption of Raw or Undercooked Meat: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis - PubMed
<span><i>Toxoplasma gondii</i> is a globally distributed protozoan that mainly causes health issues in the fetuses of pregnant women who have never been exposed to this parasite and patients with deficient immune systems. Except in these vulnerable populations, the primary infection generally...
already disproved with earlier message
If you cared about ages you wouldn’t eat red meat. It’s just virtue signaling.
Obviously this is untrue, cooking meat kills bacteria. Not sure why I even have to disprove thisExposure to Toxoplasma gondii Through Consumption of Raw or Undercooked Meat: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis - PubMed
<span><i>Toxoplasma gondii</i> is a globally distributed protozoan that mainly causes health issues in the fetuses of pregnant women who have never been exposed to this parasite and patients with deficient immune systems. Except in these vulnerable populations, the primary infection generally...
already disproved with earlier message
A lower percentage of SDA complicates digestion, which had been proven in the study you linked that cooked meat can lower SDA.If you cared about ages you wouldn’t eat red meat. It’s just virtue signaling.
Obviously this is untrue, cooking meat kills bacteria. Not sure why I even have to disprove thisExposure to Toxoplasma gondii Through Consumption of Raw or Undercooked Meat: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis - PubMed
<span><i>Toxoplasma gondii</i> is a globally distributed protozoan that mainly causes health issues in the fetuses of pregnant women who have never been exposed to this parasite and patients with deficient immune systems. Except in these vulnerable populations, the primary infection generally...
already disproved with earlier message
"Boiling and grilling significantly increased the in vitro protein digestibility of meat."
Fair point on this one, though B12 deficincy is very rare, and beef is low in D and E vs other foods.
Surely you don't think consuming bacteria is beneficial, right? This study focuses on genetically modified bacteria (not primal) in cancer curing anyway. So no, getting a bacterial infection is not just gonna "detox" you since bacteria literally release cytotoxins.
"Cooking at high temperatures or with the food in direct contact with a flame or a hot surface, as in barbecuing or pan-frying, produces more of certain types of carcinogenic chemicals (such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and heterocyclic aromatic amines)" ironic
"Red meat was classified as Group 2A, probably carcinogenic to humans"
Again, if you cared about carcinogenicity, you wouldn't eat red meat.
"Boiling and grilling significantly increased the in vitro protein digestibility of meat."
I think there is conflicting research on this topic since we both have studies that disprove each other.
Fair point on this one, though B12 deficincy is very rare, and beef is low in D and E vs other foods.
Surely you don't think consuming bacteria is beneficial, right? This study focuses on genetically modified bacteria (not primal) in cancer curing anyway. So no, getting a bacterial infection is not just gonna "detox" you since bacteria literally release cytotoxins.
To be clear, I am not advocating for a diet of burnt meat and goyslop. I just think hyperfixating on everything being raw removes the nuance that is necessary for nutrition. Also, I take more issue with other stuff that primal jesters do, like sunbathing without sunscreen or not researching than the acual diet itself.
