Prime Ben Affleck was such a Chad

Renaissance.Chad

Renaissance.Chad

Silver
Joined
Sep 7, 2020
Posts
715
Reputation
1,241
  • 6ft 4
  • celebrity status
  • tall, dark and handsome
  • has dated J Lo, Jennifer Garner, Ana de Armas
While facially, he was never Gigachad in terms of aesthetics, he had just enough that combined with his height and frame and harmony to be considered a Chad.

He is 48 now, the agepill is getting him. He hasn't aged badly, but you can see more water retention in his face and more bloat. He could fix that if he wanted.
But still, at 47 he dated a 32 year old (Ana de Armas).

rs_600x600-180628163243-600-Ben-Armageddon.jpg

ben-affleck-liv-tyler-armageddon-1998-T03R0C.jpg

ben-affleck.jpg
 
  • +1
  • Love it
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Zeusus, Deleted member 1140, untouchable_coper and 10 others
ben asslick
 
He's 6'2'', google lies.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Slob, Brazitard, OOGABOOGA and 4 others
He's 6'2'', google lies.
Was about to say. Still tall but not that tall

also affleck is very generic handsome look. Nobody can say he’s ugly but he doesn’t have a unique look that anyone really could crush on. I’m not saying he’s too perfect, just that he’s really average looking just with a very strong chin and above average eyes. He’s one of the less attractive “hot leading men” in Hollywood. Despite being 5’9ish, Matt Damon is much better looking overall and most women would pick Damon.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 1140, Brazitard, Hey dont talk to me and 5 others
Was about to say. Still tall but not that tall

also affleck is very generic handsome look. Nobody can say he’s ugly but he doesn’t have a unique look that anyone really could crush on. I’m not saying he’s too perfect, just that he’s really average looking just with a very strong chin and above average eyes. He’s one of the less attractive “hot leading men” in Hollywood. Despite being 5’9ish, Matt Damon is much better looking overall and most women would pick Damon.
You have it kinda backwards
generic handsome look is the ideal for maximum mass appeal, and generic =\= average, the average man is ugly as shit
I think the confusion comes from the fact that it generally takes a ridiculous male model alien look to make a straight man acknowledge that a guy is attractive, whereas for girls they go crazy for that generic handsome irl chad every day of their lives
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: horizontallytall, EthnicelAscension, FrenchChad and 7 others
You have it kinda backwards
generic handsome look is the ideal for maximum mass appeal, and generic =\= average, the average man is ugly as shit
I think the confusion comes from the fact that it generally takes a ridiculous male model alien look to make a straight man acknowledge that a guy is attractive, whereas for girls they go crazy for that generic handsome irl chad every day of their lives
Sure, but he’s not generic handsome enough. In a crowd of normies he stands out as very handsome but so do most people PSL 5 or above. In Hollywood he’s actually one of the less good looking men. There are not many women I’ve ever heard pining after Ben Affleck. Matt Damon has ridiculously good eyes and a sharp boyish look which is a niche many girls like. Ben Affleck is definitely very good looking but by Hollywood standards he’s a low tier leading man. IRL he’s chad.

so I’ll walk backwards a bit and say he’s IRL chad and HTN for hollywood. Matt Damon is IRL chad and Hollywood chadlite. The big thing is if Matt Damon was 6’2” he would be gigachad. If Ben Affleck was 5’9” he wouldn’t be chad.
 
Sure, but he’s not generic handsome enough. In a crowd of normies he stands out as very handsome but so do most people PSL 5 or above. In Hollywood he’s actually one of the less good looking men. There are not many women I’ve ever heard pining after Ben Affleck. Matt Damon has ridiculously good eyes and a sharp boyish look which is a niche many girls like. Ben Affleck is definitely very good looking but by Hollywood standards he’s a low tier leading man. IRL he’s chad.

so I’ll walk backwards a bit and say he’s IRL chad and HTN for hollywood
yeah, as far as hollywood goes he's pretty low
life on easy mode irl even without fame, though
 
yeah, as far as hollywood goes he's pretty low
life on easy mode irl even without fame, though
but a lot of that is just that he’s 6’2” and has a big chin. Yeah he’s chad but if you took away the gigantic chin or the height he would descend really hard to HTN territory. He’s an unstable chad. Remove one of his halos and he’s average. Like the uranium atom being unstable. Chad chemistry is a burgeoning field and Ben Affleck is the new nuclear age of Chad Chem
 
  • +1
Reactions: wristcel
but a lot of that is just that he’s 6’2” and has a big chin. Yeah he’s chad but if you took away the gigantic chin or the height he would descend really hard to HTN territory. He’s an unstable chad. Remove one of his halos and he’s average. Like the uranium atom being unstable. Chad chemistry is a burgeoning field and Ben Affleck is the new nuclear age of Chad Chem
If you remove sean o’pry’s eyes he’s normie too, that doesn’t really mean anything. Attractiveness is just having good features, and having those features work well together. Every chad is an “unstable chad” if we consider the fact that if any of them became morbidly obese they’d no longer be chads, again, it means nothing.

Let’s say it’s just his chin (i would argue he has good cheekbones, not great but not terrible eyes, and overall good harmony) well that chin is enough to bring him into being attractive, and thus live life on easy mode. The bar to do well with women is MUCH MUCH MUCH lower than any autist here thinks it is, htn is 100% enough

Yes his height contributes, but separating features like that means nothing and does nothing, there’s many different recipes to attractiveness and life is just about meeting the ingredients for one of them. And none of that changes the fact that he has life on easy mode irl without fame
 
  • +1
Reactions: Hey dont talk to me
I
Was about to say. Still tall but not that tall

also affleck is very generic handsome look. Nobody can say he’s ugly but he doesn’t have a unique look that anyone really could crush on. I’m not saying he’s too perfect, just that he’s really average looking just with a very strong chin and above average eyes. He’s one of the less attractive “hot leading men” in Hollywood. Despite being 5’9ish, Matt Damon is much better looking overall and most women would pick Damon.
I guarantee from what you typed yours slay count is <7 and you are rather unsuccessful with women. Facial averageness (which affleck has a lot of ) is number one thing for wide appeal. The results also speak themselves. Your contrived delusional theories of what shoulda woulda don’t hold up to reality
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Hey dont talk to me
I

I guarantee from what you typed yours slay count is <7 and you are rather unsuccessful with women. Facial averageness (which affleck has a lot of ) is number one thing for wide appeal. The results also speak themselves. Your contrived delusional theories of what shoulda woulda don’t hold up to reality
“I disagree with your theory of male attractiveness so you have a low slay count”

fuck that’s a retarded thing to say. I actually do have a good slay count but it has nothing to do with my judgement of how attractive Ben Affleck is. It’s not like women go up to me and ask if I understand facial averageness as it relates to Ben Affleck, refusing to fuck me if I say he’s not good looking. Or are you saying I have a low slay count with men? Because that part is true. Sorry I’m not naturally attracted to men and that I have to guess what women like.

:feelsuhh::feelsuhh::feelsuhh::feelsuhh::feelsuhh::feelsuhh::feelsuhh::feelsuhh:
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: wristcel
If you remove sean o’pry’s eyes he’s normie too, that doesn’t really mean anything. Attractiveness is just having good features, and having those features work well together. Every chad is an “unstable chad” if we consider the fact that if any of them became morbidly obese they’d no longer be chads, again, it means nothing.

Let’s say it’s just his chin (i would argue he has good cheekbones, not great but not terrible eyes, and overall good harmony) well that chin is enough to bring him into being attractive, and thus live life on easy mode. The bar to do well with women is MUCH MUCH MUCH lower than any autist here thinks it is, htn is 100% enough

Yes his height contributes, but separating features like that means nothing and does nothing, there’s many different recipes to attractiveness and life is just about meeting the ingredients for one of them. And none of that changes the fact that he has life on easy mode irl without fame
Well I do agree with that HTN is enough. I probably fall in that range and I do very well. Affleck is probably better looking than me and I’m sure he’d do better than me in his 50s than I do now. But I’ve always though that as a “leading men” he was very mediocre looking. It’s a different standard is all I’m trying to say.

I can see ur point on the rest
 
  • +1
Reactions: loksr
still chad with long face
 
  • +1
Reactions: Renaissance.Chad and Deleted member 10987
but a lot of that is just that he’s 6’2” and has a big chin. Yeah he’s chad but if you took away the gigantic chin or the height he would descend really hard to HTN territory. He’s an unstable chad. Remove one of his halos and he’s average. Like the uranium atom being unstable. Chad chemistry is a burgeoning field and Ben Affleck is the new nuclear age of Chad Chem
If you remove sean o’pry’s eyes he’s normie too, that doesn’t really mean anything. Attractiveness is just having good features, and having those features work well together. Every chad is an “unstable chad” if we consider the fact that if any of them became morbidly obese they’d no longer be chads, again, it means nothing.

Let’s say it’s just his chin (i would argue he has good cheekbones, not great but not terrible eyes, and overall good harmony) well that chin is enough to bring him into being attractive, and thus live life on easy mode. The bar to do well with women is MUCH MUCH MUCH lower than any autist here thinks it is, htn is 100% enough

Yes his height contributes, but separating features like that means nothing and does nothing, there’s many different recipes to attractiveness and life is just about meeting the ingredients for one of them. And none of that changes the fact that he has life on easy mode irl without fame
"unSTaBLE cHAd"

190084 00ddab583265ef65572ab3043bf54656
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 13409
He is 48 now, the agepill is getting him. He hasn't aged badly, but you can see more water retention in his face and more bloat. He could fix that if he wanted.

ok i agree with that, it could be a cause

but is there any permanent fix ?

(i dont consider taking diuretics a fix)
 
  • 6ft 4
  • celebrity status
  • tall, dark and handsome
  • has dated J Lo, Jennifer Garner, Ana de Armas
While facially, he was never Gigachad in terms of aesthetics, he had just enough that combined with his height and frame and harmony to be considered a Chad.

He is 48 now, the agepill is getting him. He hasn't aged badly, but you can see more water retention in his face and more bloat. He could fix that if he wanted.
But still, at 47 he dated a 32 year old (Ana de Armas).

rs_600x600-180628163243-600-Ben-Armageddon.jpg

ben-affleck-liv-tyler-armageddon-1998-T03R0C.jpg


He was but after he hit his 30's, at least in my opinion, he ran smack into the wall like a down syndrome kid at Chuck E Cheese. Hes low tier normie now, AT BEST. I would say he was about a 7-8/10 back then. Now hes like a 3/10.
 
with status yes,
without it no
 
Sure, but he’s not generic handsome enough. In a crowd of normies he stands out as very handsome but so do most people PSL 5 or above. In Hollywood he’s actually one of the less good looking men. There are not many women I’ve ever heard pining after Ben Affleck. Matt Damon has ridiculously good eyes and a sharp boyish look which is a niche many girls like. Ben Affleck is definitely very good looking but by Hollywood standards he’s a low tier leading man. IRL he’s chad.

so I’ll walk backwards a bit and say he’s IRL chad and HTN for hollywood. Matt Damon is IRL chad and Hollywood chadlite. The big thing is if Matt Damon was 6’2” he would be gigachad. If Ben Affleck was 5’9” he wouldn’t be chad.
Young Matt Damon as Jason Bourne was as Chad as they come...
 
  • 6ft 4
  • celebrity status
  • tall, dark and handsome
  • has dated J Lo, Jennifer Garner, Ana de Armas
While facially, he was never Gigachad in terms of aesthetics, he had just enough that combined with his height and frame and harmony to be considered a Chad.

He is 48 now, the agepill is getting him. He hasn't aged badly, but you can see more water retention in his face and more bloat. He could fix that if he wanted.
But still, at 47 he dated a 32 year old (Ana de Armas).

rs_600x600-180628163243-600-Ben-Armageddon.jpg

ben-affleck-liv-tyler-armageddon-1998-T03R0C.jpg

ben-affleck.jpg
How do u make ur face less bloated?
 
He's been wearing a hair system for more than a decade.
 
Htn facially
 
He has worn a hair system for decades, has had a weight problem, and is nowhere near 6'4.
 

Similar threads

20/04/2008
Replies
61
Views
3K
darodcel
darodcel
D
Replies
19
Views
6K
magdel
magdel
D
Replies
24
Views
8K
Maalik
Maalik
Zenis
Replies
87
Views
11K
crushing sluts@100%
crushing sluts@100%

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top