prominent cheekbones > everything

[IwillRope2024]

prominent cheekbones is the most important feature everything comes after it.

high-medium set wide prominent cheekbones= mogger

 

[greycel]

High set, anteriorly projected, small vertical height, flanged zygos

 

[IwillRope2024]

High set, anteriorly projected, small vertical height, flanged zygos

it’s like a halo tbh whenever someone has good cheebones they almost look angelic and their face looks very striking. even a ”good looking” person with bad cheekbones will not stand out like that.

 

[greycel]

it’s like a halo tbh whenever someone has good cheebones they almost look angelic and their face looks very striking. even a ”good looking” person with bad cheekbones will not stand out like that.

I have a theory towards this I was planning on writing
I feel it has to do with idea of support like you say.. but also yk when you see somebody with vertically small zygos that show through:

As opposed to this:

The above (Sean O'pry) looks higher class, because I think it has something to do with how valuable our subconscious perceives the zygos to be.
If a vertically short zygo is enough to hold up the entire face, then we assume innately that it has more worth for the amount of mass

So people with smaller zygos tend to look better, because we assume them to be of higher value... i.e. they don't need much compared to others

What do you guys think?

Spoiler: Tags

@thecel @pfl @chrishell @Orc @Tai Lung @chadisbeingmade

 

[JeanneDArcAlter]

I have extremely prominent cheekboens but im truecel

 

[Gamerspyy786]

Mirin everyone with high set cheekbones

 

[Orc]

I have a theory towards this I was planning on writing
I feel it has to do with idea of support like you say.. but also yk when you see somebody with vertically small zygos that show through:
View attachment 3732667

As opposed to this:
View attachment 3732670

The above (Sean O'pry) looks higher class, because I think it has something to do with how valuable our subconscious perceives the zygos to be.
If a vertically short zygo is enough to hold up the entire face, then we assume innately that it has more worth for the amount of mass

So people with smaller zygos tend to look better, because we assume them to be of higher value... i.e. they don't need much compared to others

What do you guys think?

Spoiler: Tags

@thecel @pfl @chrishell @Orc @Tai Lung @chadisbeingmade

if your cheekbones are too big they draw attention away from your face but this doesn't have to be a bad thing if your face isn't that remarkable

 

[greycel]

if your cheekbones are too big they draw attention away from your face but this doesn't have to be a bad thing if your face isn't that remarkable

What do you think about the theory of value/mass
If you look at the images for a while, it makes sense that that's what your subconscious was thinking

At least it did for me, but I might be wrong. Do you think it's cope or not?

 

[pfl]

I have a theory towards this I was planning on writing
I feel it has to do with idea of support like you say.. but also yk when you see somebody with vertically small zygos that show through:
View attachment 3732667

As opposed to this:
View attachment 3732670

The above (Sean O'pry) looks higher class, because I think it has something to do with how valuable our subconscious perceives the zygos to be.
If a vertically short zygo is enough to hold up the entire face, then we assume innately that it has more worth for the amount of mass

So people with smaller zygos tend to look better, because we assume them to be of higher value... i.e. they don't need much compared to others

What do you guys think?

Spoiler: Tags

@thecel @pfl @chrishell @Orc @Tai Lung @chadisbeingmade

I think oprys are better cause theyre just more masculine

 

[thecel]

The above (Sean O'pry) looks higher class, because I think it has something to do with how valuable our subconscious perceives the zygos to be.
If a vertically short zygo is enough to hold up the entire face, then we assume innately that it has more worth for the amount of mass

So people with smaller zygos tend to look better, because we assume them to be of higher value... i.e. they don't need much compared to others

What do you guys think?

So a smaller jaw is better than a larger jaw because the fact that the small jaw is able to chew means that it's made of stronger and denser, less breakable bone

 

[IwillRope2024]

I have a theory towards this I was planning on writing
I feel it has to do with idea of support like you say.. but also yk when you see somebody with vertically small zygos that show through:
View attachment 3732667

As opposed to this:
View attachment 3732670

The above (Sean O'pry) looks higher class, because I think it has something to do with how valuable our subconscious perceives the zygos to be.
If a vertically short zygo is enough to hold up the entire face, then we assume innately that it has more worth for the amount of mass

So people with smaller zygos tend to look better, because we assume them to be of higher value... i.e. they don't need much compared to others

What do you guys think?

Spoiler: Tags

@thecel @pfl @chrishell @Orc @Tai Lung @chadisbeingmade

i agree


In my opinion width is more important than anterior projection that’s what makes someones cheekbones prominent.

 

[greycel]

So a smaller jaw is better than a larger jaw because the fact that the small jaw is able to chew means that it's made of stronger and denser, less breakable bone

Jaw is different to zygos
Jaw it's good to be larger, zygo it's more about the pulling up effect for the face.. where if you can achieve the effect with less = higher worth

Ideal would be if Pitt had slightly more anterior projection + his current jaw width:

 

[first snow]

I have a theory towards this I was planning on writing
I feel it has to do with idea of support like you say.. but also yk when you see somebody with vertically small zygos that show through:
View attachment 3732667

As opposed to this:
View attachment 3732670

The above (Sean O'pry) looks higher class, because I think it has something to do with how valuable our subconscious perceives the zygos to be.
If a vertically short zygo is enough to hold up the entire face, then we assume innately that it has more worth for the amount of mass

So people with smaller zygos tend to look better, because we assume them to be of higher value... i.e. they don't need much compared to others

What do you guys think?

Spoiler: Tags

@thecel @pfl @chrishell @Orc @Tai Lung @chadisbeingmade

second guy has worse orbits thats the reason imo

 

[greycel]

second guy has worse orbits thats the reason imo

I think oprys are better cause theyre just more masculine

I might make a thread with multiple examples, so other factors have less of an influence
Briefly, Tyson Ballou is another good example of what I'm talking about:

Vs Vito Basso (better orbits than Ballou):

If you zoom into the Ballou pic, I think you'll see what I'm talking about. They are vertically short relative to the height of his skull

 

[Eltrē]

I have a theory towards this I was planning on writing
I feel it has to do with idea of support like you say.. but also yk when you see somebody with vertically small zygos that show through:
View attachment 3732667

As opposed to this:
View attachment 3732670

The above (Sean O'pry) looks higher class, because I think it has something to do with how valuable our subconscious perceives the zygos to be.
If a vertically short zygo is enough to hold up the entire face, then we assume innately that it has more worth for the amount of mass

So people with smaller zygos tend to look better, because we assume them to be of higher value... i.e. they don't need much compared to others

What do you guys think?

Spoiler: Tags

@thecel @pfl @chrishell @Orc @Tai Lung @chadisbeingmade

5’3 mogs 6’3 then because they don’t need as much theorem

 

[WELOVELOOKS]

it’s like a halo tbh whenever someone has good cheebones they almost look angelic and their face looks very striking. even a ”good looking” person with bad cheekbones will not stand out like that.

I’ve known people with large cheekbones who look like shit tbh

Cheekbones, but with thin tiny meme white lips, bulbous nose with weird nostrils, no eyebrows

Zygos don’t mean shit if it’s just a standalone feature

 

[first snow]

I might make a thread with multiple examples, so other factors have less of an influence
Briefly, Tyson Ballou is another good example of what I'm talking about:
View attachment 3732756

Vs Vito Basso (better orbits than Ballou):
View attachment 3732765

If you zoom into the Ballou pic, I think you'll see what I'm talking about. They are vertically short relative to the height of his skull

basso mogs that guy no debate imo, 1st guys zygos aren't remarkable
but yeah i see what you mean, just big zygos like mads mikkelsen

aren't ideal
the most important factors imo are height, anterior projection, then forward projection, size doesn't have to be crazy big

pretty much ideal

 

[first snow]

basso mogs that guy no debate imo, 1st guys zygos aren't remarkable
but yeah i see what you mean, just big zygos like mads mikkelsen View attachment 3732775
aren't ideal
the most important factors imo are height, anterior projection, then forward projection, size doesn't have to be crazy big
View attachment 3732785 pretty much ideal

RR has close to ideal zygos

 

[IwillRope2024]

I’ve known people with large cheekbones who look like shit tbh

Cheekbones, but with thin tiny meme white lips, bulbous nose with weird nostrils, no eyebrows

Zygos don’t mean shit if it’s just a standalone feature

it depends on the shape too

they can’t just be huge and protruding the ideal cheekbones are the ones with narrow and flared out zygos and a lil bit anteriorly projected not too projected tho.

 

[greycel]

basso mogs that guy no debate imo, 1st guys zygos aren't remarkable
but yeah i see what you mean, just big zygos like mads mikkelsen View attachment 3732775
aren't ideal
the most important factors imo are height, anterior projection, then forward projection, size doesn't have to be crazy big
View attachment 3732785 pretty much ideal

1st guy has some of the highest PSL zygos- most dimorphic + one of the vertically tallest hollows out of all models in the world:

He's known on org for having some of the best zygos.. so "isn't remarkable" is pretty crazy
I understand your factors, for me I'd say the most important would be:
1. shape
2. vertical height of zygos
3. height of zygos

5’3 mogs 6’3 then because they don’t need as much theorem

lol, you and @thecel mentioned similar things
You cannot generalize everything and extend it to everything being smaller. That's a category error. Or everything in nature would follow 1 trend

It's specific case-to-case, where for the zygos I'm saying it's more about efficiency (to reach a certain point: holding it up).. whereas for other stuff such as jaw/horizontal length of eyes (PFL) - more is favoured, because what's seen as ideal is based on a different distribution of priorities, and has different requisites

 

[first snow]

1st guy has some of the highest PSL zygos- most dimorphic + one of the vertically tallest hollows out of all models in the world:
View attachment 3732796 View attachment 3732797
View attachment 3732799

He's known on org for having some of the best zygos.. so "isn't remarkable" is pretty crazy
I understand your factors, for me I'd say the most important would be:

they still don't look outstanding to me in the first 2 pics, 3rd is insane tho

I understand your factors, for me I'd say the most important would be:
1. shape
2. vertical height of zygos
3. height of zygos

yeah, i forgot about shape, it's the most important for sure

 

[IwillRope2024]

1st guy has some of the highest PSL zygos- most dimorphic + one of the vertically tallest hollows out of all models in the world:
View attachment 3732796 View attachment 3732797
View attachment 3732799

He's known on org for having some of the best zygos.. so "isn't remarkable" is pretty crazy
I understand your factors, for me I'd say the most important would be:
1. shape
2. vertical height of zygos
3. height of zygos


lol, you and @thecel mentioned similar things
You cannot generalize everything and extend it to everything being smaller. That's a category error. Or everything in nature would follow 1 trend

It's specific case-to-case, where for the zygos I'm saying it's more about efficiency (to reach a certain point: holding it up).. whereas for other stuff such as jaw/horizontal length of eyes (PFL) - more is favoured, because what's seen as ideal is based on a different distribution of priorities, and has different requisites

first guys zygos are perfect this is what i mean when i say it halos the face.

they still don't look outstanding to me in the first 2 pics, 3rd is insane tho


yeah, i forgot about shape, it's the most important for sure

brother the 2nd and 3rd pics are in black and white ofc their features will pop out more because of it

 

[first snow]

brother the 2nd and 3rd pics are in black and white ofc their features will pop out more because of it

hard zygomog imo

 

[LTNUser]

True

 

[greycel]

first guys zygos are perfect this is what i mean when i say it halos the face.

exactly
That's where I got the idea from
The fact that something so vertically short relative to the height of his face/skull, is able to stretch out his skin so much to create such large hollows...
Shows how valuable it is

It's insane compared to something on the other end (focusing only on the cheekbones):

 

[It'snotover]

It's specific case-to-case, where for the zygos I'm saying it's more about efficiency (to reach a certain point: holding it up).. whereas for other stuff such as jaw/horizontal length of eyes (PFL) - more is favoured, because what's seen as ideal is based on a different distribution of priorities, and has different requisites

I agree with your conclusion but I think you just used the wrong reasons. Yeah: on males smaller cheekbones are more desirable, it's a fact. But it’s simply because ideally men should have very high cheekbones and the higher the cheekbone the smaller it tends to be. Higher smaller cheekbones are better simply because they are very dimorphic and your subconscius recognise them as superior.

 

[NVM_Ignacio]

prominent cheekbones is the most important feature everything comes after it.

high-medium set wide prominent cheekbones= mogger

 

[first snow]

exactly
That's where I got the idea from
The fact that something so vertically short relative to the height of his face/skull, is able to stretch out his skin so much to create such large hollows...
Shows how valuable it is

It's insane compared to something on the other end (focusing only on the cheekbones):
View attachment 3732890

i think larger zygos mog high class ones

 

[greycel]

I agree with your conclusion but I think you just used the wrong reasons. Yeah: on males smaller cheekbones are more desirable, it's a fact. But it’s simply because ideally men should have very high cheekbones and the higher the cheekbone the smaller it tends to be. Higher smaller cheekbones are better simply because they are very dimorphic and your subconscius recognise them as superior.

For two people with the same height of zygomatic arch + shape, but different vertical heights of the zygos on the frontal plane.. which would you think would be better?
And why?

 

[It'snotover]

For two people with the same height of zygomatic arch + shape, but different vertical heights of the zygos on the frontal plane.. which would you think would be better?
And why?

Different vertical height would make a high cheekbone medium set so I guess some extra mass in that case would be ok. If they happened to be lower set the less mass the better otherwise you would look like permabloated or a tranny

 

[first snow]

I agree with your conclusion but I think you just used the wrong reasons. Yeah: on males smaller cheekbones are more desirable, it's a fact. But it’s simply because ideally men should have very high cheekbones and the higher the cheekbone the smaller it tends to be. Higher smaller cheekbones are better simply because they are very dimorphic and your subconscius recognise them as superior.

higher are better because more protection of eye area

 

[sendhilodashishya]

High set, anteriorly projected, small vertical height, flanged zygos

All high set zygos have small vertical height

 

[shehzadgillani]

I have a theory towards this I was planning on writing
I feel it has to do with idea of support like you say.. but also yk when you see somebody with vertically small zygos that show through:
View attachment 3732667

As opposed to this:
View attachment 3732670

The above (Sean O'pry) looks higher class, because I think it has something to do with how valuable our subconscious perceives the zygos to be.
If a vertically short zygo is enough to hold up the entire face, then we assume innately that it has more worth for the amount of mass

So people with smaller zygos tend to look better, because we assume them to be of higher value... i.e. they don't need much compared to others

What do you guys think?

Spoiler: Tags

@thecel @pfl @chrishell @Orc @Tai Lung @chadisbeingmade

true idk much but sean o pry looks more approchable, and those cheekbones fit his harmony so much, as opposed to jon

 

[Yliaster]

Facts