Proof of ideal IPD measurment?

[NuclearGeo20]

Koinophilia and dimorphism are what makes someone attractive.

I see a lot of different studies on average IPD. Some come out to 62, others 64, others 65.

RSM said on tiktok that the ideal measurment is 65 to 67 mm.

Can you share your reasoning for this measurement plzzzzzz. Is 65mm average and dimorphic?

@RealSurgerymax

 

[vision_n]

Beauty is subjective. There is no perfect meausurement, everyone is somehow attractive

 

[HighIQ ubermensch]

depends on skull size
what a retarded thread lmao

 

[NuclearGeo20]

depends on skull size

not really

 

[vincentzygo]

Beauty is subjective. There is no perfect meausurement, everyone is somehow attractive

Gtfo

 

[Djimo]

not really

why not?

 

[NuclearGeo20]

why not?

koinophilic, dimorphic features are attractive on their own.

There is no such thing as a bad feature "harmonizing" with another bad feature.

Just because you have a big skull, doesn't mean that you should wreck the IPD so you can have a .46 ratio or whatever, JFL at this logic

 

[Djimo]

koinophilic, dimorphic features are attractive on their own.

There is no such thing as a bad feature "harmonizing" with another bad feature.

Just because you have a big skull, doesn't mean that you should wreck the IPD so you can have a .46 ratio or whatever, JFL at this logic

with your logic it would be ideal to have a 65mm ipd while having a 12cm skull or 15cm skull thats just wrong.

thats the reason that metric measurements dont really work.

and for some people a t2 or t3 feature might align better with their overall face than a t1 feature.

Ratios mog

 

[Djimo]

Just because you have a big skull, doesn't mean that you should wreck the IPD so you can have a .46 ratio or whatever, JFL at this logic

i havent seen anything this stupid in ages.

 

[Djimo]

Just because you have a big skull, doesn't mean that you should wreck the IPD so you can have a .46 ratio or whatever, JFL at this logic

let me show you something.

For my example i will use a wide skulled person.

his skull is approximately 16.2cm BUT his ipd is around 64mm which is very close to ideal.
you can clearly see that his ipd is too narrow in comparison to his skull.


altough his ipd is near ideal doesnt mean that its perfect for him.
Take a look at his esr; its about 39% which means its way too narrow although his ipd is considered ideal.

---

Conclusion; ideal ipd doesnt lead to ideal esr, making ipd pretty much useless.

 

[Djimo]

OP fuck you for jfling while having an iq of 90, you dumb fuck

 

[Djimo]

learn to be open minded and learn from other users

 

[Djimo]

let me show you something.

For my example i will use a wide skulled person.

his skull is approximately 16.2cm BUT his ipd is around 64mm which is very close to ideal.
you can clearly see that his ipd is too narrow in comparison to his skull.
View attachment 4001827

altough his ipd is near ideal doesnt mean that its perfect for him.
Take a look at his esr; its about 39% which means its way too narrow although his ipd is considered ideal.
View attachment 4001817

---

Conclusion; ideal ipd doesnt lead to ideal esr, making ipd pretty much useless.

@idkmanimao i saw you repping this thread so heres the answer

 

[NuclearGeo20]

learn to be open minded and learn from other users

the actual distance between the eyes is what makes eyes appear close or far set, not the ESR.

Read this comment from thecel on my stupid ass post

Is IPD/bizygomatic (ESR) a bad ratio? A new ratio for eye spacing?

But does it or does it not look more masculine? Here's that morph, but ICD/IPD is preserved I'd say yes although his eye aspect is completely fucked now jfl (I know you didn't care abt that)

looksmax.org

 

[Djimo]

the actual distance between the eyes is what makes eyes appear close or far set, not the ESR.

i know, icd is the deciding factor put once your esr is good it basicly automatically means your icd is good aswell and vice versa.

ofc exceptions exist.

 

[Djimo]

the thing is that we could continue ramblin about CA but we will probably never know what the ideals are for each person sadly.

its so interesting but ropefuel at the same time

 

[NuclearGeo20]

the thing is that we could continue ramblin about CA but we will probably never know what the ideals are for each person sadly.

its so interesting but ropefuel at the same time

i will tag you in my new post.