Proof that forward growth doesn’t mean shit

[Deleted member 2788]

Thousands of comments from girls being thirsty over this guy on the comments even tho he is recessed, but front view is what Really matters:

 

[Deleted member 8165]

i agree

 

[Copemaxxing]

 

[Gremblo]

His name?

 

[Looks234]

It’s a bad angle. He still has forward growth lmao.

 

[DharkDC]

Thousands of comments from girls being thirsty over this guy on the comments even tho he is recessed, but front view is what Really matters:

View attachment 873654View attachment 873655

he has forward growth lmao. Amount of giga cope on .me these days

 

[Deleted member 399]

Bullshit post.

 

[retard]

1. pics are 2 dimensional, the only time you can actually judge forward growth in a frontal pic are due to lighting effects

2. a good maxilla supports all other features, eye area, zygos, jaw, etc, it is the effect on how forward growth supports your soft tissue, not just how much blunt maxillary growth you have. By that logic all blacks would be gigamoggers, and all ricecels would be supreme incels

and that nigga is angle frauding both his jaw and eye area, which frauds the effect of a good maxilla, in irl non fraudeds he would look like street shit

 

[Deleted member 2788]

1. pics are 2 dimensional, the only time you can actually judge forward growth in a frontal pic are due to lighting effects

2. a good maxilla supports all other features, eye area, zygos, jaw, etc, it is the effect on how forward growth supports your soft tissue, not just how much blunt maxillary growth you have. By that logic all blacks would be gigamoggers, and all ricecels would be supreme incels

and that nigga is angle frauding both his jaw and eye area, which frauds the effect of a good maxilla, in irl non fraudeds he would look like street shit

Hey dude any improvement on under eye with that squinting routine you was doing?

 

[retard]

Hey dude any improvement on under eye with that squinting routine you was doing?

sadly no, it seems there is most likely a limit to how much your lower lid can be supported by muscle, and that limit is likely your bone structure

 

[Deleted member 2788]

sadly no, it seems there is most likely a limit to how much your lower lid can be supported by muscle, and that limit is likely your bone structure

Any other looksmaxx you’re doing rn that you think are worth doing?

i remembered your post talking about MSE. My narrow mouth and palate is something that really failos me i think. It’s sad that there’s no orthodontist where i live that even knows what mse is

 

[retard]

Any other looksmaxx you’re doing rn that you think are worth doing?

i remembered your post talking about MSE. My narrow mouth and palate is something that really failos me i think. It’s sad that there’s no orthodontist where i live that even knows what mse is

nah not atm

starting to think mse is p overrated, if you are a narrowfacecel its good but you also have to diastemamax for a yr, and its combination with facepulling is not very good like I once thought, if its just for palatal gains and not bone structure ones, a regular palatal expander would do the trick which any ortho offers

 

[Deleted member 2788]

nah not atm

starting to think mse is p overrated, if you are a narrowfacecel its good but you also have to diastemamax for a yr, and its combination with facepulling is not very good like I once thought, if its just for palatal gains and not bone structure ones, a regular palatal expander would do the trick which any ortho offers

It is just for palatal gains, to get a better smile. Palate expanders works post puberty? I’m 22 already

 

[Deleted member 6892]

nah not atm

starting to think mse is p overrated, if you are a narrowfacecel its good but you also have to diastemamax for a yr, and its combination with facepulling is not very good like I once thought, if its just for palatal gains and not bone structure ones, a regular palatal expander would do the trick which any ortho offers

is facepulling with mse cope then?

 

[pizza]

this guy is like me,shit side profile

 

[Deleted member 10185]

Thousands of comments from girls being thirsty over this guy on the comments even tho he is recessed, but front view is what Really matters:

View attachment 873654View attachment 873655

He has forward growth. What you are talking about?

This what you look when you have bad forward growth.

https://i.redd.it/phlq4gdv4e561.jpg

 

[Deleted member 10185]

i agree

Bloat.

 

[Deleted member 8165]

Bloat.

im loosing weight ok???

 

[retard]

It is just for palatal gains, to get a better smile. Palate expanders works post puberty? I’m 22 already

ya it'd probably be work, alot more orthos are attempting palate expansion on adults nowadays, given obviously not a 100% success rate

is facepulling with mse cope then?

most likely, there is a fuck ton of false info surrounding mse (not by psl but by actual orthodontists)

the main 2 being mse being considered a bone anchored form of pulling, which is just straight up wrong

and the other being that mse is supposed to open up the circummaxillary sutures, which I never really understood because just from a physics perspective it made no sense why they would be significantly opened, however I also found a study which states palatal expansion hardly does shit for the circummaxillary sutures, in terms of opening (it opened them like .1 mm), as well as a study with regular palate expansion, vs mse expansion, and they did facepulling on both groups, and the group with mse expansion got like .1 mm more forward growth after maxilla protraction (if mse actually opened up the sutures more than a regular palate expander, there would of been significantly higher gains)

 

[Deleted member 6892]

ya it'd probably be work, alot more orthos are attempting palate expansion on adults nowadays, given obviously not a 100% success rate


most likely, there is a fuck ton of false info surrounding mse (not by psl but by actual orthodontists)

the main 2 being mse being considered a bone anchored form of pulling, which is just straight up wrong

and the other being that mse is supposed to open up the circummaxillary sutures, which I never really understood because just from a physics perspective it made no sense why they would be significantly opened, however I also found a study which states palatal expansion hardly does shit for the circummaxillary sutures, in terms of opening (it opened them like .1 mm), as well as a study with regular palate expansion, vs mse expansion, and they did facepulling on both groups, and the group with mse expansion got like .1 mm more forward growth after maxilla protraction (if mse actually opened up the sutures more than a regular palate expander, there would of been significantly higher gains)

sutures barely open...
no ccw i guess then
onto the next cope

 

[thecel]

Can someone draw a maxillary triangle to expose the cope if it isn’t already obvious that he has forward growth?