Proof that God does not exist

[brutal_blackpill]

I have come up with a rigorous proof for how god cannot, or atleast is very unlikely, to exist.

Preamble

In order for something to serve as a good explanation for something, it must compress data. What does this mean? By compressing data, what we mean is essentially shortening the description of otherwise disparate phenomena. For example, scientific laws and the equations corresponding to them and the theoretical posits pertaining to them serve as good explanations because a few equations and dispositions generate all of reality, which would otherwise seemingly consist of many, disparate phenomena. So the goal of explanation is to shorten the description of all of reality. That is why science works

Why god is a bad explanation

There is simply no way to compress any amount of reality using god. Try it. You will fail. "But god explains why the universe started". That's not shortening shit. What you're saying is that the universe started and then attaching a "god did it" label to it. You are adding to reality, not compressing it. This is the same reason why "aliens did it", "fairies did it", etc don't work either.

Why does "humans did it" work as an explanation sometimes? Because that explanation does compress reality. Describing a natural process that could potentially create a watch (if even possible) would take much longer of a description and be intrinsically unexplainable than describing a manmade process creating that watch. This is easy because we have evidence of humans not only existing but designing things like watches

In conclusion: god cannot be a good explanation since he doesn't compress any of reality

Inb4 DNR

 

[nobodylovesme]

rigorous proof

stopped here

 

[ICXCLuvr]

stopped here

you are a retard, you have nothing useful to say so you just think of some quick reply fucking idiot delete your account

 

[gonnabehappy]

Good thoughts tbh

 

[RXnd]

 

[nobodylovesme]

you are a retard, you have nothing useful to say so you just think of some quick reply fucking idiot delete your account

Why so emotional? Is this your boyfriend?

 

[ICXCLuvr]

Why so emotional? Is this your boyfriend?

i just don’t like you personally ever consider that? jackass

 

[brutal_blackpill]

Why so emotional? Is this your boyfriend?

maybe he is just annoyed by the surface level stupidity on this forum

 

[nobodylovesme]

maybe he is just annoyed by the surface level stupidity on this forum

I read your argument, it is just an assumption that explanation = compression. How is that an argument at all, it really isn't.

You are just making assumption and coming to the same conclusion, it's circular.

 

[brutal_blackpill]

I read your argument, it is just an assumption that explanation = compression. How is that an argument at all, it really isn't.

You are just making assumption and coming to the same conclusion, it's circular.

because what else is an explanation except to help you understand something? and how can you understand something if that explanation does not shorten reality or make it simpler for you or give a step by step causal chain of the process that allows you to understand?

scientific laws are simpler than the phenomena they explain. Gravity is simpler than the tons of objects that fall down because of it. Thermodynamics is simpler than the gazillions of molecules in the universe that obey it. etc etc

 

[forsearches]

I have come up with a rigorous proof for how god cannot, or atleast is very unlikely, to exist.

Preamble

In order for something to serve as a good explanation for something, it must compress data. What does this mean? By compressing data, what we mean is essentially shortening the description of otherwise disparate phenomena. For example, scientific laws and the equations corresponding to them and the theoretical posits pertaining to them serve as good explanations because a few equations and dispositions generate all of reality, which would otherwise seemingly consist of many, disparate phenomena. So the goal of explanation is to shorten the description of all of reality. That is why science works

Why god is a bad explanation

There is simply no way to compress any amount of reality using god. Try it. You will fail. "But god explains why the universe started". That's not shortening shit. What you're saying is that the universe started and then attaching a "god did it" label to it. You are adding to reality, not compressing it. This is the same reason why "aliens did it", "fairies did it", etc don't work either.

Why does "humans did it" work as an explanation sometimes? Because that explanation does compress reality. Describing a natural process that could potentially create a watch (if even possible) would take much longer of a description and be intrinsically unexplainable than describing a manmade process creating that watch. This is easy because we have evidence of humans not only existing but designing things like watches

In conclusion: god cannot be a good explanation since he doesn't compress any of reality

Inb4 DNR

If god exists he hates all of us

 

[2vi_ls]

I have come up with a rigorous proof for how god cannot, or atleast is very unlikely, to exist.

Preamble

In order for something to serve as a good explanation for something, it must compress data. What does this mean? By compressing data, what we mean is essentially shortening the description of otherwise disparate phenomena. For example, scientific laws and the equations corresponding to them and the theoretical posits pertaining to them serve as good explanations because a few equations and dispositions generate all of reality, which would otherwise seemingly consist of many, disparate phenomena. So the goal of explanation is to shorten the description of all of reality. That is why science works

Why god is a bad explanation

There is simply no way to compress any amount of reality using god. Try it. You will fail. "But god explains why the universe started". That's not shortening shit. What you're saying is that the universe started and then attaching a "god did it" label to it. You are adding to reality, not compressing it. This is the same reason why "aliens did it", "fairies did it", etc don't work either.

Why does "humans did it" work as an explanation sometimes? Because that explanation does compress reality. Describing a natural process that could potentially create a watch (if even possible) would take much longer of a description and be intrinsically unexplainable than describing a manmade process creating that watch. This is easy because we have evidence of humans not only existing but designing things like watches

In conclusion: god cannot be a good explanation since he doesn't compress any of reality

Inb4 DNR

He exists, but not your god. The are the ones.