Proof that whites mog ethnics

They discovered it themselves, and then they used it and they taught it to others, who used it again, that is how knowledge spreads.

They used to make theorems, and they did make statements, definitions, axioms.

The concept of zero was a big deal, and they proved the theorem, the Pythagorean theorem.

They were far ahead in mathematics, and they were more interested in learning it than any other kind of study.
show me the evidence that they did have such axiomatic idea of mathematics. at least a google article. and indian contributions to math and science were really insignificant beside that of whites.
 
I’m not really insulted. I’m annoyed at the stupidity and how you said it. I’m also British, not Indian.
British immigrant still an indian
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 27939 and pfl
I'm telling you again. the rieman hypothesis was already relevant before ramanujan
No it was not, it was made by one mathematician only, and it was not being cared about. Many would have heard about it, but nobody bothered about proving it or making it relevant. It was just any other piece of math out of many.

But then Ramanujan and his notes made it relevant again.

He was the reason why the Riemann hypotheses became relevant, he made it relevant and everybody took a look at it.

He made the mathematicians all over the world turn their attention to it, and that led to the Riemann-Siegel problem.
 
No it was not, it was made by one mathematician only, and it was not being cared about. Many would have heard about it, but nobody bothered about proving it or making it relevant. It was just any other piece of math out of many.

But then Ramanujan and his notes made it relevant again.

He was the reason why the Riemann hypotheses became relevant, he made it relevant and everybody took a look at it.

He made the mathematicians all over the world turn their attention to it, and that led to the Riemann-Siegel problem.
Yes it was revelant even before cope
 
No it was not, it was made by one mathematician only, and it was not being cared about. Many would have heard about it, but nobody bothered about proving it or making it relevant. It was just any other piece of math out of many.

But then Ramanujan and his notes made it relevant again.

He was the reason why the Riemann hypotheses became relevant, he made it relevant and everybody took a look at it.

He made the mathematicians all over the world turn their attention to it, and that led to the Riemann-Siegel problem.
Coping again, Even Landau knew the problem and remarked it in his publications. it was already well known before ramanujan
 
You literally said that was an insult lying again JFL
It's true that some whites were dominant. That's no different than the KKK saying that they're better than everyone else because their white.

You're basically saying that some people are better than others.
 
It's true that some whites were dominant. That's no different than the KKK saying that they're better than everyone else because their white.

You're basically saying that some people are better than others.
It is a fact that the latins and anglo saxons were dominant and most influential over the history
 
Yes it was revelant even before cope
It was not that relevant, it was just another piece of mathematics in the mountain that exists.

He made the most important mathematics by just predicting about the primes and also by solving questions that nobody thought about it for a 100 years.

He revolutionized almost every branch of mathematics, just by himself.
 
Coping again, Even Landau knew the problem and remarked it in his publications. it was already well known before ramanujan
But the interest in it grew 10 times after it, and we know a lot more than before.

Also, they did not just care enough until Ramanujan's notes were discovered, because he showed there is a lot more to this.
 
It was not that relevant, it was just another piece of mathematics in the mountain that exists.

He made the most important mathematics by just predicting about the primes and also by solving questions that nobody thought about it for a 100 years.

He revolutionized almost every branch of mathematics, just by himself.
Cope
 
It was not that relevant, it was just another piece of mathematics in the mountain that exists.

He made the most important mathematics by just predicting about the primes and also by solving questions that nobody thought about it for a 100 years.

He revolutionized almost every branch of mathematics, just by himself.
"He revolutionized almost every branch of mathematics, just by himself." No he did not. Stop coping
 
But the interest in it grew 10 times after it, and we know a lot more than before.

Also, they did not just care enough until Ramanujan's notes were discovered, because he showed there is a lot more to this.
No it didn't no one even realized that ramanujan was referencing to the rieman hypothesis except hardy.
 
"He revolutionized almost every branch of mathematics, just by himself." No he did not. Stop coping
Yes he did, without him our understanding of any mathematics would not be nearly as high as it is today.

We would have to wait at least another 50 years to find the things he was looking at.

His work makes us take a much more advanced and deep look, than if we would have taken if he had not been born.

He also increased our understanding of the Riemann Hypotheses by 100%.

Ramanujan made that contribution, and we are still trying to answer whether he was right or not.
 
Yes he did, without him our understanding of any mathematics would not be nearly as high as it is today.

We would have to wait at least another 50 years to find the things he was looking at.

His work makes us take a much more advanced and deep look, than if we would have taken if he had not been born.

He also increased our understanding of the Riemann Hypotheses by 100%.

Ramanujan made that contribution, and we are still trying to answer whether he was right or not.
Yeah then tell me the works of ramanujan that is so influential. i can tell you tons of it that were done by whites.
 
Yeah then tell me the works of ramanujan that is so influential. i can tell you tons of it that were done by whites.
Number theory was not as strong before that, it was not even that respected before that.

After he made it relevant, it's significance increased by a lot.

His work on pi, has revolutionized the way we view it.
 
Number theory was not as strong before that, it was not even that respected before that.

After he made it relevant, it's significance increased by a lot.

His work on pi, has revolutionized the way we view it.
Newton's calculus alone solos the whole influence of indians
 
  • Woah
Reactions: SheafCohomology
Number theory was not as strong before that, it was not even that respected before that.

After he made it relevant, it's significance increased by a lot.

His work on pi, has revolutionized the way we view it.
"Number theory was not as strong before that, it was not even that respected before that." a complete lie you are coping curry. "His work on pi, has revolutionized the way we view it." What works?
 
Newton's calculus alone solos the whole influence of indians
No it did not, Newton only created one concept and then people improved upon it.

If you are saying that he is better than everyone else because of that, then you are doing the same thing what white historians did, by hyping up the British.

Most of what Newton was built on what the Egyptians and Greeks had already begun.

If you are calling that impressive then I am telling you that ramanujan showed the same thing in every area of math.
 
No it did not, Newton only created one concept and then people improved upon it.

If you are saying that he is better than everyone else because of that, then you are doing the same thing what white historians did, by hyping up the British.

Most of what Newton was built on what the Egyptians and Greeks had already begun.

If you are calling that impressive then I am telling you that ramanujan showed the same thing in every area of math.
Yes he did Newton's calculus = Foundation of electricity
 
No it did not, Newton only created one concept and then people improved upon it.

If you are saying that he is better than everyone else because of that, then you are doing the same thing what white historians did, by hyping up the British.

Most of what Newton was built on what the Egyptians and Greeks had already begun.

If you are calling that impressive then I am telling you that ramanujan showed the same thing in every area of math.
Not only calculus but he established Newton's law

literally the foundation fire and electricity of Phyisics
 
"Number theory was not as strong before that, it was not even that respected before that." a complete lie you are coping curry.
I am not lying, before him, number theory was not as much of a concern as any other part of mathematics.

Most people were doing basic stuff like calculating equations or finding areas.
"His work on pi, has revolutionized the way we view it." What works?
The Ramanujan summation is one of the main and most important one, which made the summation of 1 - 1/2 + 1/9 - 1/36 + 1/49... go from -pi/12 to the sum - pi^2 /12

This was the most influential one
 
I am not lying, before him, number theory was not as much of a concern as any other part of mathematics.

Most people were doing basic stuff like calculating equations or finding areas.

The Ramanujan summation is one of the main and most important one, which made the summation of 1 - 1/2 + 1/9 - 1/36 + 1/49... go from -pi/12 to the sum - pi^2 /12

This was the most influential one
Nowhere influence of newton's calculus and newton's law
 
Newton's calculus = Foundation of electricity
What is the relation between the two?

Newton invented calculus, and calculus in itself has no application with electricity.

Later on, people used calculus to make new things, like electric field theory, electric charges, laws etc.

Newton's was the first to use calculus for some other purpose.

So he is not the greatest, he was the first white man to do it. Others are more advanced than him too.
 
What is the relation between the two?

Newton invented calculus, and calculus in itself has no application with electricity.

Later on, people used calculus to make new things, like electric field theory, electric charges, laws etc.

Newton's was the first to use calculus for some other purpose.

So he is not the greatest, he was the first white man to do it. Others are more advanced than him too.
What i am saying it has the impact as foundation of fire and electricitiy
 
I am not lying, before him, number theory was not as much of a concern as any other part of mathematics.

Most people were doing basic stuff like calculating equations or finding areas.

The Ramanujan summation is one of the main and most important one, which made the summation of 1 - 1/2 + 1/9 - 1/36 + 1/49... go from -pi/12 to the sum - pi^2 /12

This was the most influential one
"Most people were doing basic stuff like calculating equations or finding areas." a complete lie again. by the time the foundations of abstract analysis and algebra was already established, topology was being pioneered rapidly, and the status of number theory had always been the same. ramanujan did not change anything. "
The Ramanujan summation is one of the main and most important one, which made the summation of 1 - 1/2 + 1/9 - 1/36 + 1/49... go from -pi/12 to the sum - pi^2 /12" how important was this? and you do not even know about mathematics including your little curry summation. Ramanujan Sum is not like that:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
 
What i am saying it has the impact as foundation of fire and electricitiy
No, that is not the case tho.

Newton did not really make that much impact in physics, except create some new formulas and laws and make up the basics of motion.

But it was other people who made the most important discoveries like electric field theory, and Einstein's laws for how to work with gravity.
 
"Most people were doing basic stuff like calculating equations or finding areas." a complete lie again. by the time the foundations of abstract analysis and algebra was already established, topology was being pioneered rapidly, and the status of number theory had always been the same. ramanujan did not change anything. "
The Ramanujan summation is one of the main and most important one, which made the summation of 1 - 1/2 + 1/9 - 1/36 + 1/49... go from -pi/12 to the sum - pi^2 /12" how important was this? and you do not even know about mathematics including your little curry summation. Ramanujan Sum is not like that:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
Well it is much more significant to all of mathematics, the whole mathematics changed after he discovered it.

After that, people realized the most extreme limits and limits in general, and the summation of infinite sums made it very important to understand them.

That lead to a lot of other areas being created, and also led to the creation of a lot of other things. It has revolutionized this entire field, without him it would have taken 100s of years to be understood, he did it in just 3 years and it was not even a full time study.
 
zip it up when ur done bjobing the jeet cok @Third Eye
 
  • JFL
Reactions: pfl
Well it is much more significant to all of mathematics, the whole mathematics changed after he discovered it.

After that, people realized the most extreme limits and limits in general, and the summation of infinite sums made it very important to understand them.

That lead to a lot of other areas being created, and also led to the creation of a lot of other things. It has revolutionized this entire field, without him it would have taken 100s of years to be understood, he did it in just 3 years and it was not even a full time study.
You are making things up. explain the works of ramanujan as well as how and why they are important exactly.
 
No, that is not the case tho.

Newton did not really make that much impact in physics, except create some new formulas and laws and make up the basics of motion.

But it was other people who made the most important discoveries like electric field theory, and Einstein's laws for how to work with gravity.
Yes it was foundation of calculus = fire in math

Foundation of newton's law = electricity in physics
 
You are making things up. explain the works of ramanujan as well as how and why they are important exactly.
I can't do that within a short summary, his works are just so vast.

His works are so hard, that only few understand it. I did understand it, but only by using a computer. He did not have a computer.

His works are just so vast. It would take more than a whole book to explain them.

Nobody could understand or explain the Riemann hypotheses, he even made the most important contributions to it, by just using a pen and paper.
 
Yes it was foundation of calculus = fire in math

Foundation of newton's law = electricity in physics
What is the relation between the two?

Newton invented calculus, and calculus in itself has no application with electricity.

Later on, people used calculus to make new things, like electric field theory, electric charges, laws etc.

Newton's was the first to use calculus for some other purpose.

So he is not the greatest, he was the first white man to do it. Others are more advanced than him too.
 
What I was saying is calculus like a foundation of fire and electricity
Calculus was already an established subject for some time, but it was all basic.

Nobody did much research on it, the only thing which was a bit more than basic, was the newton's formula.

But the real deal were the formulas that ramanujan made.
 
Calculus was already an established subject for some time, but it was all basic.

Nobody did much research on it, the only thing which was a bit more than basic, was the newton's formula.

But the real deal were the formulas that ramanujan made.
Cope ramanujans' job were easy

Newton is the pioneer
 

Similar threads

6ft4
Replies
39
Views
641
Deleted member 130915
D
N
Replies
132
Views
2K
JeanneDArcAlter
JeanneDArcAlter
Kirby9784
Replies
9
Views
606
Gus17
Gus17
copercel123
Replies
74
Views
1K
arian-persian
A

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top