Proportions vs Features ''debate'': my personal friend's example showed to me not only features (isolated) dont matter, there isnt even a real debate.

[hairenjoyercel]

let me give you a picture of what im trying to really say: my friend is well over 6ft+, has a square, defined, robust jaw, is lean and, on top of all that, is white as snow.

there's just one single problem: HE IS STILL A KHHV INCEL WHO IS UGLY AS BRICKS. WHY?! CAUSE HIS PROPORTIONS ARE ALL FUCKED UP.

his face is weird and nerdy like, his skin complexion is below avg, he is too skinny, his frame/body in general doesnt match his face robustness, and his voice is of an 11 yrs old kid, which makes it even harder to take him seriously and as an equal.

now obviously i cant show his face in here, but you just have to take my word for his existence.

so, anyways, its all about how your features work with the rest of your body, NOT how those features are perceived in isolation!!!! you can have everything right in isolation and still look like a heinous monster, or give an uncanny valley syndrome vibe.

 

[Klasik616]

He's just a cutecel

 

[stufftodo]

depends on broadly you classify features. if you get into the specifics like a square chin, sharp nose tip, high nose bridge, high canthal tilt. there's more room for there to be errors right? but if you say a guy has hella pretty eyes he probably mogs in eye area overall. though proportions is king

 

[HandsomeOrDeath]

Ideal proportion should create excellent features. Just look at super models, they nearly all have the same proportions AND features. Just the hair and skin colour changes.