Proximity and monetized dating are here. Looks are irrelevant.

[TheLastLaugh]

Lately I've been shocked to discover the amount of women on IG who turned off DMs completely, only for friends. @Whatever talked about Tinder and nightclub culture being a temporary fad and that society would return to proximity based dating. Well now it's happening. It doesn't matter how high value someone is, they simply cannot compete with the 0 value subhuman in front of her face.

The dating “market” (non-proximity) is burning out in a similar way. So many people have had such negative experiences with the apps that the overall meta is shifting back to proximity. And this explains both the 2024 “why aren’t I getting any dates” and “why do I see so many mismatched couples”. That dating as a marketplace between strangers is collapsing and the lottery of right time right place is back on.

With both my first and second girl I saw this very up close, guys in a girl’s proximity are her real options. There was a shitload of guys in their DMs but it was easier for them to just have me over after work/class. That’s your real competition, not guys on apps better looking or taller than you. Guys like her coworker she works the same hours as, her housemate’s ex who she heard fucking through the walls, some guy she’s trying to steal off a girl she hates. That’s what goes on in the real world, not just looks.

If you went on a site like Seeking and ran a simple reverse image search you'd be in disbelief at how many women are secretly selling pussy online. Those women you see on Tinder? Yea a bunch of them are also on these sugar baby sites. Recently they implemented a live selfie verification requirement, so you know its them and not a catfish. On top of this, Seeking has a discretion feature similar to Tinder where users can only be seen by people they choose to be seen by, so there is a lot more of this going on than you'll ever know.

The reason Tinder and cold approach are so awful now is women are either fucking a subhuman in their social circle or selling pussy to a stranger. Ask yourself, how does someone fit in there with no proximity and no moneygame? They don't. Looks mean nothing compared to these 2 factors. So many men are broke losers who can't compete so they refuse to acknowledge how money changes everything, but if that's the case then why will every woman you know, including the poorest ones get flown around this summer without a female friend in sight (clearly with a guy)?

If you're stubborn enough to think that you are the exception and you can just make your way into a woman's life without already being in her social circle or running moneygame because you are just that goodlooking, realize this...It is very easy to ghost some stranger they don't even know, in fact they are subconsciously looking for any reason to disqualify strangers but look for any reason to make it work with the guys around them despite having no value. When women are dealing with a guy for financial reasons they've already made it up in their mind that they will make it work, none of this seeing if they actually like the guy or developing an ick for some stupid reason. The flaky, indecisive behavior goes away when money is involved.

@6ft4
@Whatever

 

[StacySexuaI]

I'm both broke and ugly nigga it's over, also dnr who gonna read this shit fr

 

[Chimera]

You date someone you form a deep connection with.

The easiest way to do that is with the direct circle around you.

If you have to use a dating app, you're already losing the game.

 

[incel-at-heart]

TRVTHNVKE

 

[OldRooster]

talked about Tinder and nightclub culture being a temporary fad and that society would return to proximity based dating. Well now it's happening. It doesn't matter how high value someone is,
@Whatever

Nightclubs have been around since at least the 1920s, they and the party girls that are addicted to the validation they get from them are not going anywhere.

It is possible online dating will drop off significantly. Perhaps women are finally wising up to the amount of frauding and height inflation that have been taking place, and the fact that most of the women choose the same 10% of men on the sites. I can imagine an online dating service involving a good deal of authentication, they verify your name, age and height, take realistic pictures of you.

 

[Whatever]

Ya, it's actually money that wins on OLD, not looks and not status. By maybe 21-22 they've already had enough Tinder Chads and there's too much competition for high status guys. But rich older guys are available and have a lot to offer financially and once a girl realizes this, it's a huge shift in her self interest, jfl at anyone who says that money doesn't matter or muh agepill.

This one girl I kinda know (see her around) who is 21, I came across her Hinge profile. And it said "I'll fall for you if buy me a ranch in Montana", which can be over $1 million. And I'm 31 so she is swiping on guys well into their 30s to make this happen, she's only half kidding. What I took from it is that if you see a random HTB+ out there in public, she's probably in the money game.

 

[thereallegend]

The real world is ran by looks, money, status interacting with each other simultaneously. Mods need to sticky this thread.

 

[6.5x5cel]

View attachment 3794631

Lately I've been shocked to discover the amount of women on IG who turned off DMs completely, only for friends. @Whatever talked about Tinder and nightclub culture being a temporary fad and that society would return to proximity based dating. Well now it's happening. It doesn't matter how high value someone is, they simply cannot compete with the 0 value subhuman in front of her face.



View attachment 3794666
View attachment 3794670

If you went on a site like Seeking and ran a simple reverse image search you'd be in disbelief at how many women are secretly selling pussy online. Those women you see on Tinder? Yea a bunch of them are also on these sugar baby sites. Recently they implemented a live selfie verification requirement, so you know its them and not a catfish. On top of this, Seeking has a discretion feature similar to Tinder where users can only be seen by people they choose to be seen by, so there is a lot more of this going on than you'll ever know.

The reason Tinder and cold approach are so awful now is women are either fucking a subhuman in their social circle or selling pussy to a stranger. Ask yourself, how does someone fit in there with no proximity and no moneygame? They don't. Looks mean nothing compared to these 2 factors. So many men are broke losers who can't compete so they refuse to acknowledge how money changes everything, but if that's the case then why will every woman you know, including the poorest ones get flown around this summer without a female friend in sight (clearly with a guy)?

If you're stubborn enough to think that you are the exception and you can just make your way into a woman's life without already being in her social circle or running moneygame because you are just that goodlooking, realize this...It is very easy to ghost some stranger they don't even know, in fact they are subconsciously looking for any reason to disqualify strangers but look for any reason to make it work with the guys around them despite having no value. When women are dealing with a guy for financial reasons they've already made it up in their mind that they will make it work, none of this seeing if they actually like the guy or developing an ick for some stupid reason. The flaky, indecisive behavior goes away when money is involved.

@6ft4
@Whatever

Thoughts @DrTony