Deleted member 11370
Equinox
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2020
- Posts
- 2,744
- Reputation
- 3,820
@MaxillaIsEverything i saw his thread and it was really good stuff.
looksmax.org
check it out
--------------------------
Anyways
found this, they morphed the same guys face to get different values (High facial attractiveness, high values, high narcissism)
basically physiognomy and how it effects the face.
Highest male attractiveness (based on the face they got)
Lowest facial attractiveness (based on the face)
--
Highest long term mating % of success face.
----------------
Now point of this thread now mix the long term mating face and the highest facial attractiveness face you basically get the face that @MaxillaIsEverything proposed.
now for all the people citing studies on how wider faces are actually better.
This right here is the highest short term mating success for males (based on the face)
and look how you are getting different emotions from the faces (psychopathic, angelic )
this is physiognomy.
if you get really good u can tell what kind person the person is without even saying a word to him.
I got a HUGEEE folder of faces.
point of this thread is @MaxillaIsEverything is right.
also try to remember that guy in the pic is in a generic white T-shirt and running 0 facial expressions.
that looksmins hard.
imagine that guy given the treatment of male models.
PSL debunked - This is the face white women consider ideal and by far the most attractive IRL - Keep coping with your compact midface, wide face
(Skip to characteristics if TLDR) A lot of PSL understanding of what constitutes an attractive face is still heavily flawed. A lot of people still place way too much importance on characteristics such as a wide, square jaw or a wide face in general when in reality people do not consider them...
--------------------------
Anyways
found this, they morphed the same guys face to get different values (High facial attractiveness, high values, high narcissism)
basically physiognomy and how it effects the face.
Highest male attractiveness (based on the face they got)
Lowest facial attractiveness (based on the face)
--
Highest long term mating % of success face.
----------------
Now point of this thread now mix the long term mating face and the highest facial attractiveness face you basically get the face that @MaxillaIsEverything proposed.
now for all the people citing studies on how wider faces are actually better.
and look how you are getting different emotions from the faces (psychopathic, angelic )
this is physiognomy.
if you get really good u can tell what kind person the person is without even saying a word to him.
I got a HUGEEE folder of faces.
point of this thread is @MaxillaIsEverything is right.
also try to remember that guy in the pic is in a generic white T-shirt and running 0 facial expressions.
that looksmins hard.
imagine that guy given the treatment of male models.