PSL doesn’t always correlate with smv, why psl is a flawed system

FinallyAscended

FinallyAscended

The next Rothschild
Joined
Jan 6, 2020
Posts
343
Reputation
427
Past a certain psl 6.5~ You reach diminishing returns and even smv starts to decline in the eyes of women

Just like with physique there’s a certain point in facial bone structure where things start to become too much and become uncanny

This is why chico lachowski smv mogs Jordan barret to the moon although arguably Jordan barret has a higher psl.


1644845109079

1644845170563


Just like in bodybuilding you reach a point where facial aesthetics are perfect like Arnold Schwarzenegger(Chico) but the more you go past this point the facial aesthetics become overly strong large, monstrous, gruesome and uncanny and appeal drops hard (barret)

Chico bodybuilding example
1644845373355


Barret bodybuilding example
1644845526750

So I believe there is a point when it is too much when it comes to facial bone structure and size
Hope you understood what do you think
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: teemowhite, Deleted member 15827 and Bonez
PSL is not an exact science or scale that does not even take into account subjectivity in looks therefore does not correspond to SMV.
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Toth's thot, xanny and Alexanderr
Barrett mogs that little kid to hell
 

Similar threads

G
Replies
51
Views
7K
Yahya
Yahya
Xangsane
Replies
113
Views
7K
Xangsane
Xangsane
majesticincel
Replies
63
Views
10K
Lovecraftscat
Lovecraftscat

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top