PSL for women is the stupidest thing

[ChadL1te]

I think at this point lots of us would agree PSL is a flawed system and not always applicable. However for women, its even more of a pointless system. Let me explain.

The whole system is based on proportions, and distinct features being attractive with no room for nuance. But when judging girls 'regularly' when does a single fucking guy think like this? There should be an entirely different system for women. Men statistically have longer and thinner eyes, sharper and more defined bone structure, thicker eyebrows etc. So why in the fuck are girls put on the same standard? Especially when they're put in different standards for everything else?

Sydney Sweeny vs Bella Hadid:
Bella's PSL mogs Sydney's to oblivion right? Maybe, but who in the fuck would rather make out/fuck Hadid over Sweeny? Not a single person on this forum if people we're being honest. You might say 'water' or "people can distinguish PSL from a 'regular scale.'" Thats true... but there are dozens of threads on here trashing Sweeny or other 'low PSL' models knowing damn well if they came up to them IRL they would nut before they could say hello, many users have spent to much time here, and actually think in terms of PSL when judging a girl's attractiveness.

Conclusion: Sure, you can rate women based on PSL. But wtf is the point? It doesn't apply to them and there should be a new system/ not used at all for women.

 

[esoterik]

dnrd, too much text but you prob said sum about psl vs appeal with examples. this also applies to men. psl was never a good system

also bella's midface is too long to be high psl lmao

 

[ChadL1te]

dnrd, too much text but you prob said sum about psl vs appeal with examples. this also applies to men. psl was never a good system

also bella's midface is too long to be high psl lmao

I didnt bring up the word appeal once actually bc its overused but your takeaway is accurate

 

[ChadL1te]

tagging good users @ylrven @NorwoodAscender @5.5 @dragomaxxer @pneumocystosis @TechnoBoss @Verline

 

[TechnoBoss]

Very true. I was about to say in general PSL should be used to rate "objective beauty" but as I was saying that, I realized how stupid it was. What is objective beauty if in your example Hadid has higher PSL (theoretically objective beauty) but i'd rather fuck Sweeney? Completely pointless. This applies to men too. Some of the most lusted after men aren't men who have the highest PSL or even highest status.

Maybe there's something to beauty that isn't quantifiable. B-but m-muh ratios. My gonial angle.

Can you give another example of women who have objectively higher PSL than another women, but still get fogged?

 

[ChadL1te]

Very true. I was about to say in general PSL should be used to rate "objective beauty" but as I was saying that, I realized how stupid it was. What is objective beauty if in your example Hadid has higher PSL (theoretically objective beauty) but i'd rather fuck Sweeney? Completely pointless. This applies to men too. Some of the most lusted after men aren't men who have the highest PSL or even highest status.

Maybe there's something to beauty that isn't quantifiable. B-but m-muh ratios. My gonial angle.

Can you give another example of women who have objectively higher PSL than another women, but still get fogged?

Sure. Also, I agree in a sense its pointless for men.

Jung Hoyeon vs Jennifer Lawrence

Jung has the much higher PSL but I don't know a single straight guy that would chose her over JLaw

 

[Ultimate SUbhuman]

Sure. Also, I agree in a sense its pointless for men.

View attachment 2762476View attachment 2762480
Jung Hoyeon vs Jennifer Lawrence

Jung has the much higher PSL but I don't know a single straight guy that would chose her over JLaw

Horrible pics for each of them

 

[ElTruecel]

Nah it works fine greycel.

 

[TechnoBoss]

Sure. Also, I agree in a sense its pointless for men.

View attachment 2762476View attachment 2762480
Jung Hoyeon vs Jennifer Lawrence

Jung has the much higher PSL but I don't know a single straight guy that would chose her over JLaw

This one is a bit more subjective. I can think of a few Asian worshippers who would choose Jung over Jlaw.

Overall though, it's interesting how we need to learn to identify PSL attractiveness, and people choose to use that learned metric as opposed to our natural sense of what beauty is, and isn't. I don't know if I agree 100% on this theory though, because once you look at what PSL is, you can easily identify the parts of a person that are attractive, and the parts that aren't. So PSL is obviously legit, but it doesn't account 100% for what a person will like more/what they find beautiful (even if they know PSL themselves and can breakdown peoples faces objectively)

Horrible pics for each of them

I do agree.

 

[Ultimate SUbhuman]

This one is a bit more subjective. I can think of a few Asian worshippers who would choose Jung over Jlaw.

Overall though, it's interesting how we need to learn to identify PSL attractiveness, and people choose to use that learned metric as opposed to our natural sense of what beauty is, and isn't. I don't know if I agree 100% on this theory though, because once you look at what PSL is, you can easily identify the parts of a person that are attractive, and the parts that aren't. So PSL is obviously legit, but it doesn't account 100% for what a person will like more/what they find beautiful (even if they know PSL themselves and can breakdown peoples faces objectively)


I do agree.

Good pics in my opinion

 

[Swarthy Knight]

Imagine taking effort to rate foids jfl. Either you would, or you wouldn't. It's that simple

 

[BasedCanadian]

I think at this point lots of us would agree PSL is a flawed system and not always applicable. However for women, its even more of a pointless system. Let me explain.

The whole system is based on proportions, and distinct features being attractive with no room for nuance. But when judging girls 'regularly' when does a single fucking guy think like this? There should be an entirely different system for women. Men statistically have longer and thinner eyes, sharper and more defined bone structure, thicker eyebrows etc. So why in the fuck are girls put on the same standard? Especially when they're put in different standards for everything else?
View attachment 2762455View attachment 2762456
Sydney Sweeny vs Bella Hadid:
Bella's PSL mogs Sydney's to oblivion right? Maybe, but who in the fuck would rather make out/fuck Hadid over Sweeny? Not a single person on this forum if people we're being honest. You might say 'water' or "people can distinguish PSL from a 'regular scale.'" Thats true... but there are dozens of threads on here trashing Sweeny or other 'low PSL' models knowing damn well if they came up to them IRL they would nut before they could say hello, many users have spent to much time here, and actually think in terms of PSL when judging a girl's attractiveness.

Conclusion: Sure, you can rate women based on PSL. But wtf is the point? It doesn't apply to them and there should be a new system/ not used at all for women.

Yes this is very very true. Most women celebrities who people call "mid" would instantly become crushes if they were to be women in our lives.

 

[tristanbongo]

but who in the fuck would rather make out/fuck Hadid over Sweeny?

me af

 

[esoterik]

I didnt bring up the word appeal once actually bc its overused but your takeaway is accurate

human attraction or appeal is a multifaceted interplay of psychological and physiological determinants driving aesthetic and emotional appeal

appeal is relevant and is exactly what your describing

 

[esoterik]

Yes this is very very true. Most women celebrities who people call "mid" would instantly become crushes if they were to be women in our lives.

nah

 

[BasedCanadian]

nah

View attachment 2762495

Ok so why aren't the random girls you find models then lol.

 

[esoterik]

Ok so why aren't the random girls you find models then lol.

are you retarded nigga? appeal is a wide range of fruit, not every girl you find attractive can be a model, most the 'appeal' both male and female models have is range, not facial aesthetic appeal

 

[foidshateme]

Sure. Also, I agree in a sense its pointless for men.

View attachment 2762476View attachment 2762480
Jung Hoyeon vs Jennifer Lawrence

Jung has the much higher PSL but I don't know a single straight guy that would chose her over JLaw

Jung looks cuter imo, I would fuck her, due to the collagen on her skin and plump lips, Jlaw is a used up roastie, would not go near

 

[wishIwasSalludon]

tagging good users @ylrven @NorwoodAscender @5.5 @dragomaxxer @pneumocystosis @TechnoBoss @Verline

why no me tagged?

 

[spark]

I think at this point lots of us would agree PSL is a flawed system and not always applicable. However for women, its even more of a pointless system. Let me explain.

The whole system is based on proportions, and distinct features being attractive with no room for nuance. But when judging girls 'regularly' when does a single fucking guy think like this? There should be an entirely different system for women. Men statistically have longer and thinner eyes, sharper and more defined bone structure, thicker eyebrows etc. So why in the fuck are girls put on the same standard? Especially when they're put in different standards for everything else?
View attachment 2762455View attachment 2762456
Sydney Sweeny vs Bella Hadid:
Bella's PSL mogs Sydney's to oblivion right? Maybe, but who in the fuck would rather make out/fuck Hadid over Sweeny? Not a single person on this forum if people we're being honest. You might say 'water' or "people can distinguish PSL from a 'regular scale.'" Thats true... but there are dozens of threads on here trashing Sweeny or other 'low PSL' models knowing damn well if they came up to them IRL they would nut before they could say hello, many users have spent to much time here, and actually think in terms of PSL when judging a girl's attractiveness.

Conclusion: Sure, you can rate women based on PSL. But wtf is the point? It doesn't apply to them and there should be a new system/ not used at all for women.

bella doesnt look very good

objectively speaking

 

[FutureSlayer]

Bella doesnt mog shit even in psl scale

 

[BasedCanadian]

are you retarded nigga? appeal is a wide range of fruit, not every girl you find attractive can be a model, most the 'appeal' both male and female models have is range, not facial aesthetic appeal

regardless the meme u sent is completely opinionated and meaningless

 

[arab_chink]

I think at this point lots of us would agree PSL is a flawed system and not always applicable. However for women, its even more of a pointless system. Let me explain.

The whole system is based on proportions, and distinct features being attractive with no room for nuance. But when judging girls 'regularly' when does a single fucking guy think like this? There should be an entirely different system for women. Men statistically have longer and thinner eyes, sharper and more defined bone structure, thicker eyebrows etc. So why in the fuck are girls put on the same standard? Especially when they're put in different standards for everything else?
View attachment 2762455View attachment 2762456
Sydney Sweeny vs Bella Hadid:
Bella's PSL mogs Sydney's to oblivion right? Maybe, but who in the fuck would rather make out/fuck Hadid over Sweeny? Not a single person on this forum if people we're being honest. You might say 'water' or "people can distinguish PSL from a 'regular scale.'" Thats true... but there are dozens of threads on here trashing Sweeny or other 'low PSL' models knowing damn well if they came up to them IRL they would nut before they could say hello, many users have spent to much time here, and actually think in terms of PSL when judging a girl's attractiveness.

Conclusion: Sure, you can rate women based on PSL. But wtf is the point? It doesn't apply to them and there should be a new system/ not used at all for women.

There is a psl for women but we dont know how to measure it since most of our ratios is for males only, the only way we will get close to the most attractive female is use common ratios(example: midface) and ai

 

[Feliezzx]

This applies to men too. Some of the most lusted after men aren't men who have the highest PSL or even highest status.

Maybe there's something to beauty that isn't quantifiable. B-but m-muh ratios. My gonial angle.

Harmony = collagen + ratios
End of discussion
PSL does work, bella would fog sydney at the same bodyfat, same lighting and same expression

 

[Feliezzx]

There is a psl for women but we dont know how to measure it since most of our ratios is for males only, the only way we will get close to the most attractive female is use common ratios(example: midface) and ai

There are ideal ratios for women too yk...

 

[arab_chink]

There are ideal ratios for women too yk..

Yes that is my point, the thing is that ratio is different than males

 

[TechnoBoss]

Harmony = collagen + ratios
End of discussion
PSL does work, bella would fog sydney at the same bodyfat, same lighting and same expression

"b-but Bella would fog if she had more collagen, better lighting, same bodyfat, same expression, same everything!" Blah blah blah cope cope cope.

Semi agree with the first sentence though gj.

 

[Feliezzx]

Yes that is my point, the thing is that ratio is different than males

No, you said we don't know how to measure it and you're wrong because we do

 

[arab_chink]

No, you said we don't know how to measure it and you're wrong because we do

Ok well do you know the gonail to cheekbone width for females

 

[Feliezzx]

"b-but Bella would fog if she had more collagen, better lighting, same bodyfat, same expression, same everything!" Blah blah blah cope cope cope.

Semi agree with the first sentence though gj.

Her hair is stuck to her head with fucking elmers glue, she's looking sickly pale and malnourished and has a thousand yard blank expression

 

[ChadL1te]

Jung looks cuter imo, I would fuck her, due to the collagen on her skin and plump lips, Jlaw is a used up roastie, would not go near

Tf are you talking about used up bro would be lucky to be in a vicinity of her

 

[Feliezzx]

Ok well do you know the gonail to cheekbone width for females

81.5-88.5%

 

[Feliezzx]

Ok well do you know the gonail to cheekbone width for females

And what the fuck is a fucking gonail you retard

 

[arab_chink]

81.5-88.5%

False

 

[arab_chink]

And what the fuck is a fucking gonail you retard

Doesnt matter same shit

 

[Feliezzx]

False

Tf you mean false are you fucking retarded getting your fucking knowledge from tiktok you piece of shit graycel

 

[Feliezzx]

Doesnt matter same shit

Kill yourself

 

[sportsmogger]

Sure. Also, I agree in a sense its pointless for men.

View attachment 2762476View attachment 2762480
Jung Hoyeon vs Jennifer Lawrence

Jung has the much higher PSL but I don't know a single straight guy that would chose her over JLaw

Phenopill

 

[Melly]

W for mads profile picture

 

[Melly]

False appeal is something more than that
This guy has way more female attention than hernan drago and he isnt even widely known tho both of them lost youthfulness and colagen and hernan having heigher PSL so there more too appeal than what u imply

Harmony = collagen + ratios
End of discussion
PSL does work, bella would fog sydney at the same bodyfat, same lighting and same expression

 

[foidshateme]

Tf are you talking about used up bro would be lucky to be in a vicinity of her

you're acting like I'll ever be in the vicinity of Jung kek, if I had to choose between both Jung all the way, she is way more youthful and cute, JLaw has nothing about her that basic bitch on tinder doesn't have.

 

[Deleted member 50511]

False appeal is something more than that
This guy has way more female attention than hernan drago and he isnt even widely known tho both of them lost youthfulness and colagen and hernan having heigher PSL so there more too appeal than what u implyView attachment 2762755View attachment 2762756View attachment 2762757View attachment 2762762View attachment 2762763

mads has more appeal, drago is too hyper masculine and only guys like that

 

[Clavicular]

I think at this point lots of us would agree PSL is a flawed system and not always applicable. However for women, its even more of a pointless system. Let me explain.

The whole system is based on proportions, and distinct features being attractive with no room for nuance. But when judging girls 'regularly' when does a single fucking guy think like this? There should be an entirely different system for women. Men statistically have longer and thinner eyes, sharper and more defined bone structure, thicker eyebrows etc. So why in the fuck are girls put on the same standard? Especially when they're put in different standards for everything else?
View attachment 2762455View attachment 2762456
Sydney Sweeny vs Bella Hadid:
Bella's PSL mogs Sydney's to oblivion right? Maybe, but who in the fuck would rather make out/fuck Hadid over Sweeny? Not a single person on this forum if people we're being honest. You might say 'water' or "people can distinguish PSL from a 'regular scale.'" Thats true... but there are dozens of threads on here trashing Sweeny or other 'low PSL' models knowing damn well if they came up to them IRL they would nut before they could say hello, many users have spent to much time here, and actually think in terms of PSL when judging a girl's attractiveness.

Conclusion: Sure, you can rate women based on PSL. But wtf is the point? It doesn't apply to them and there should be a new system/ not used at all for women.

This is true, but i use it for eugenics, keep ur offspring in mind.

 

[ChadL1te]

W for mads profile picture

Finally, he's getting some recognition. Hes also a great actor watch 'The Hunt' if you haven't.

 

[Melly]

Yeah he perfomance was unmatched in hunt

Finally, he's getting some recognition. Hes also a great actor watch 'The Hunt' if you haven't.

 

[arab_chink]

Tf you mean false are you fucking retarded getting your fucking knowledge from tiktok you piece of shit graycel

Joined Aug 26, 2023, you came from tiktok lol