Hector
Ultraesthetics
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2019
- Posts
- 2,216
- Reputation
- 4,527
Listen carefully brahs:
The current trend in PSL is wrong focused on single features making it a method of rating with a lot of flaws.
People tend to isolate facial features give them a rating (sometimes based on broscience from here) and then take that rate with the other features rate making a weird mix of rates that gives a total rate, that sometimes is far away from real SMV of the person.
Whats the point of PSL if you can't objectively valuate someone SMV (looks part only of course, the L of LMS)?
You see people here giving low PSL rates to people that in real life they are proven slayers and extremly attractive to women. This is flaw of the current PSL system.
Example: Alain Delon is low PSL rated, because some of his features arent top tier, yet he is considered by women one of the most handsome man ever. Or some tik tok boy who has a lot of UEE yet he is very attractive to girls. Okey you now can cope, but thats a flaw in the aspie system.
THE SOLUTION?
The strong skull theory + good devolopement theory + halos - falios
PSL system
(This is what I use for rate people actually since I noticed IRL that the people I rated using the convetional method didn't match its appeal to women).
Thats all, 4 things. Not 63829728 facial features isolated and then joined in a global where you arent secure about which one is more important.
You neen, of course, to know what makes a strong skull, is not just dismorphism, because women can have a strong skull too (attractives one do, they just look femenine). And to spot a well devoloped face (aka facial growth, palate...)
I will talk about this in a new thread I will make soon. I hope it didnt sounded autistic but I bet it did.
I am aware that this would be insulted and all because some people like to cope to feel better a out themselves trying to convince others and themselves about how some features are higher valuated in attractiveness than other (because they have this feature better than the rest).
Inb4: OP is a fag, didn read and this kind of things.
The current trend in PSL is wrong focused on single features making it a method of rating with a lot of flaws.
People tend to isolate facial features give them a rating (sometimes based on broscience from here) and then take that rate with the other features rate making a weird mix of rates that gives a total rate, that sometimes is far away from real SMV of the person.
Whats the point of PSL if you can't objectively valuate someone SMV (looks part only of course, the L of LMS)?
You see people here giving low PSL rates to people that in real life they are proven slayers and extremly attractive to women. This is flaw of the current PSL system.
Example: Alain Delon is low PSL rated, because some of his features arent top tier, yet he is considered by women one of the most handsome man ever. Or some tik tok boy who has a lot of UEE yet he is very attractive to girls. Okey you now can cope, but thats a flaw in the aspie system.
THE SOLUTION?
The strong skull theory + good devolopement theory + halos - falios
PSL system
(This is what I use for rate people actually since I noticed IRL that the people I rated using the convetional method didn't match its appeal to women).
Thats all, 4 things. Not 63829728 facial features isolated and then joined in a global where you arent secure about which one is more important.
You neen, of course, to know what makes a strong skull, is not just dismorphism, because women can have a strong skull too (attractives one do, they just look femenine). And to spot a well devoloped face (aka facial growth, palate...)
I will talk about this in a new thread I will make soon. I hope it didnt sounded autistic but I bet it did.
I am aware that this would be insulted and all because some people like to cope to feel better a out themselves trying to convince others and themselves about how some features are higher valuated in attractiveness than other (because they have this feature better than the rest).
Inb4: OP is a fag, didn read and this kind of things.
