PSL scale is garbage

D

Deleted member 2381

It’s so over for the average schmuck
Joined
Jul 14, 2019
Posts
14,865
Reputation
85,963
Back in 2016 when I joined lookism, PSL 8 was the highest and it was reserved for the elite of the elite

PSL 7 would be the best looking guy in a university/club/any venue

PSL 6 was Chadlite tier

Now people are calling top tier male models and best looking men on earth PSL 6s do you retards think this is any better than the scale normies use? :lul:
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: the next o'pry, RAMU KAKA, hardestmfintheroom and 21 others
What is psl scare
 
  • JFL
Reactions: RAMU KAKA, Deleted member 16275, ascension and 4 others
Exactly, we need to use the 1-10 scale
 
  • +1
Reactions: RAMU KAKA, Deleted member 22918, Patient A and 4 others
Exactly, we need to use the 1-10 scale
Legit, but 10 should always be left blank tbh

There's no such thing as a perfect face irl, you can always improve little things
 
  • +1
Reactions: RAMU KAKA, hardestmfintheroom, Patient A and 1 other person
I am PSL 2.5
8ABAF6F0 D7AF 457B B32E AE29E5FCD9DB
 
  • Love it
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 25591 and Corleone
Maher is 6.75 PSL
 
  • Love it
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Dystopian and Blackgymmax
Yeah

2 pages on my rate and I didn't get a single PSL. Or any worthwhile advice for that matter even if I am a Uruk-Hai.

Never agreed on 10 being some muted fantasy on a scale for anything when that rating technically is as objective as can be.

You would never view your most beloved, prized things whether you own them or not, as a 9 when you can't find any flaws. From Tyler Maher to Mona Lisa to Tutankhamun's grave to Cara Delevingne to Notorious BIG's Ready To Die.
 
Last edited:
If you look at PSL rating threads from 2+ years ago, the standard was way different.

What is now seen has 5–5.5 PSL was often rated above 6.5 back then
 
  • +1
Reactions: fukmylyf
the rating system is retarted.

They abolished 9 and 10 "cause no one is perfect"

But also 8 PSL doesn't exist cause no one is perfect.

So now a 7 is perfect?

Shit doesn't make sense

Should have just used 1-10, then they wouldn't have to you use decimal numbers like they constantly do now
 
  • +1
Reactions: nevermind2 and Patient A
PSL is peak incel autism. The normie 1-10 rating will always be superior.
 
  • +1
Reactions: chawaje, User49, Prince88 and 10 others
the rating system is retarted.

They abolished 9 and 10 "cause no one is perfect"

But also 8 PSL doesn't exist cause no one is perfect.

So now a 7 is perfect?

Shit doesn't make sense

Should have just used 1-10, then they wouldn't have to you use decimal numbers like they constantly do now
Tbh, who was the autist who invented psl scale 1-8
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 14693
it's idiotic lmao normie scale mogs and makes more sense
MTN=5, HTN=6, Chadlite+ = 7+, etc etc
makes more sense than retarded muh 4 psl 4.5 psl etc
 
  • +1
Reactions: zerotohero
PSL is peak incel autism. The normie 1-10 rating will always be superior.
or just use tier system

S for gigachads like Gandy
A+ for top tier chads/models
A- for low chads
B+ for chadlites
B- for High tier normies
C for above average guys
D for normies
E for below average and LTN
F for truecel
 
  • +1
Reactions: Zylk
People here retarded, when u are rated HTN here, u are like 9 IRL

HTN here = ultrachad irl
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 21700 and jflsnowdzz
People here retarded, when u are rated HTN here, u are like 9 IRL

HTN here = ultrachad irl
ppl cant rate. they rate me HTN here while I am invisible to women IRL

Everyone over-rates by like ~1PSL
 
People who rate in general appeal on the 1-10 scale are much more consistent than whoever is using this so called objective PSL scale.
 
ppl cant rate. they rate me HTN here while I am invisible to women IRL

Everyone over-rates by like ~1PSL
Yet i saw movie stars chads who was casted to roles becasue of their looks rated HTN here on daily basis

Then they rate some local incel poster as HTN too

Rating here is much much mroe deluded than normie one - normies are better at rating
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 21700, Prince88, Overthinker and 5 others
I miss lookism.net
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: Sens
or just use tier system

S for gigachads like Gandy
A+ for top tier chads/models
A- for low chads
B+ for chadlites
B- for High tier normies
C for above average guys
D for normies
E for below average and LTN
F for truecel
or just use PSL
way easier
 
Yet i saw movie stars chads who was casted to roles becasue of their looks rated HTN here on daily basis

Then they rate some local incel poster as HTN too

Rating here is much much mroe deluded than normie one - normies are better at rating
The problem is also that you have people that live in the west and people that live in the slums of mumbai on the same forum.

What is commonly rated as 'HTN' here would be considered just an average young dude where I live, MTN. While it's a chadlite in mumbai. Etc
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: User49, jflsnowdzz, ROTTING and 3 others
or just use PSL
way easier
Then they would say muh 8 PSL doesn't exist muh 7 PSL doesn't exist. Plus we then don't have to use decimals which is way better
 
  • JFL
Reactions: StrangerDanger
Then they would say muh 8 PSL doesn't exist muh 7 PSL doesn't exist. Plus we then don't have to use decimals which is way better
PSL is just TRM rate * (8/10) its pretty standardized
letters is shit
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 17872
Literally how?
More unnecessary increments leading to people overrating themselves, all the tiers you need are subhuman, LTN, MTN, HTN, Chadlite and Chad+, the PSL scale fits perfectly that

PSL
7 Striking Attractive People
6 Attractive Everyday People
5 Semi-Attractive Everyday People (certain mild to moderate shortcomings)
4 Plain/Unremarkable Appearing Everyday People /or/ Mixed Features People <---
3 Moderately-Unattractive Everyday People (and actually the average of the adult world population) <---
2 Unattractive Everyday People
1 The Strikingly Ugly
 
Legit, but 10 should always be left blank tbh

There's no such thing as a perfect face irl, you can always improve little things
that is literally the exact logic that creates the lower ratings that you're actively complaining about

to my knowledge that was the same logic that decided it was capped at 8 because "nobody is perfect" etc
so what's happening here is that people keep deciding that that highest number is unattainable to any human being, so probably what happened is that people have decided that 8 is now unattainable (even though it was set at 8 because 9 was unattainable or whatever) and so now in their heads the new max is 7, thus why everyone rates the top guys at 6.x now.

Eventually if we keep doing this "muh it's unattainable" shit 6 will become the new max lmao
I think the clue that this is what's happening is that psl is at 8 meaning this fucking "max is unattainable" shit HAD to have happened to the 9 before it, and obviously the original 10 lmfao

how about instead of this "x is unattainable" nonsense we just decide that 10 does NOT mean PERFECTION, it just means the best looking that a human being can ever be. This will probably stop the lowering of the ratings, I would imagine.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 25339 and Deleted member 19174
More unnecessary increments leading to people overrating themselves, all the tiers you need are subhuman, LTN, MTN, HTN, Chadlite and Chad+, the PSL scale fits perfectly that

PSL
7 Striking Attractive People
6 Attractive Everyday People
5 Semi-Attractive Everyday People (certain mild to moderate shortcomings)
4 Plain/Unremarkable Appearing Everyday People /or/ Mixed Features People <---
3 Moderately-Unattractive Everyday People (and actually the average of the adult world population) <---
2 Unattractive Everyday People
1 The Strikingly Ugly
Here is how the rating system should go

10 Ascended being
9 Giga Chad
8 Chad
7 Chadlite
6 HTN
5 MTN
4 LTN
3 Subhuman
2 Deformed
1 It’s Over

Boom, end of debate.
 
Jfl PSL /8 was taken off lookism /10. It has nothing to do with TRM.

Writing A+ is easier than wirting 6.75 PSL
You are reading between the lines and finding something that was never said how you can even misinterpret it
PSL is already a standardized system and anyone with an iq above temp can figure it out in an hour
TRM too also has a standardized system and if you times it with 0.8 you will find out that they correspond
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 17872
More unnecessary increments leading to people overrating themselves, all the tiers you need are subhuman, LTN, MTN, HTN, Chadlite and Chad+, the PSL scale fits perfectly that

PSL
7 Striking Attractive People
6 Attractive Everyday People
5 Semi-Attractive Everyday People (certain mild to moderate shortcomings)
4 Plain/Unremarkable Appearing Everyday People /or/ Mixed Features People <---
3 Moderately-Unattractive Everyday People (and actually the average of the adult world population) <---
2 Unattractive Everyday People
1 The Strikingly Ugly
how about all of you stop this completely retarded discussion of assigning arbitrary numbers to a human and like go based on the said human's dating life and success?
Wouldn't that be like way easier?
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: jflsnowdzz
how about all of you stop this completely retarded discussion of assigning arbitrary numbers to a human and like go based on the said human's dating life and success?
Wouldn't that be like way easier?
No, cuz looks is not the only variant that affects dating success.
 
Here is how the rating system should go
Are you regularly able to hook up and/or date the girls you are heavily attracted to? Yes or No

Boom, end of debate.
Fixed it for you
 
No, cuz looks is not the only variant that affects dating success.
Obviously but assigning numbers to a persons face doesn't do shit for you especially when you can't even collectively agree on something as a group
 
I'm around psl 3
 
Back in 2016 when I joined lookism, PSL 8 was the highest and it was reserved for the elite of the elite

PSL 7 would be the best looking guy in a university/club/any venue

PSL 6 was Chadlite tier

Now people are calling top tier male models and best looking men on earth PSL 6s do you retards think this is any better than the scale normies use? :lul:
should just rate SMV 1-10. I'm sick of all the Ramirez obsessed non-NT teens that see some bones in a face and think it automatically correlates with sex appeal.
 
iirc it originates from how everyone is so picky on psl forums that it was impossible to get over an 8. like if u were 10 irl u were 8 in psl max. ppl rated 5/10 normalfags as 3/10 so you would be a 3 in the psl forums
 

Similar threads

eternalcoper
Replies
15
Views
719
eternalcoper
eternalcoper
I
Replies
19
Views
876
Restitutor Orbis
Restitutor Orbis
itsherlossNVM
Replies
72
Views
1K
roadtochang123
roadtochang123
xnj
Replies
105
Views
2K
got.daim
got.daim
6ft4
Replies
63
Views
2K
sub5niggermonkey
sub5niggermonkey

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top