D
Deleted member 22886
Zephir
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2022
- Posts
- 415
- Reputation
- 477
Reason 1:
Different threads about PSL ratings contradict each other. There is NO UNIFIED SYSTEM OF MEASURING FACE ATTRACTIVENESS BY USING PSL SCALE.
For example in this thread OP claims that "PSL 5 is equivalent to 84.15%" and PSL 5 =HTN. In another thread by different OP
looksmax.org
It is pointed out that "5PSL = weak chadlite and equivalent to 85-90th percentile".
Reason 2
Absolutely wrong distribution.
Furthemore, this is what OP1 think how HTN (15/100 or 3/20) look like
Typical HTN in Mumbai..........
Besides that, this is what OP2 think how weak Chadlite (10-15/100, or 2-3/20) look like
He also said that " weak chadlites are (15/100 or 3/20), mid level chadlites are 5-10/100 (1-2/20) and strong chadlites (Chalamet/Ronaldo) are 2/100."
So according to this OP, in average class or group of 20 males, would be 3 weak chadlites and 1 mid chadlites. For dumbasses, that's completely wrong.
Reason 3
Nobody can tell differences between examples (not real life attitude) of HTN , Chadlites, Chads in PSL scale.
OP1 said that Timoti is 5 PSL and Ronaldo is 5.5 PSL. WTF, this is PSL, only face analysis not body, status or money.
OP2 said that Timoti and Ronaldo are strong chadlites. JFL....
Reason 4
Doesn't take into account the location
Let's return to this picture
Do you really think, that these asians dudes will be consider chadlites in Sweden or Germany? Most likely no.
However, in Asia they would be Chads.
Nevertheless, you can say that they're chadlites among Asian and etc. But at this point, PSl loses all its relevance because now, you don't compete with males of your own race for pussies, you compete with males of different races.
So, we have to make a new scale to measure attractiveness. PSL is gone.
Different threads about PSL ratings contradict each other. There is NO UNIFIED SYSTEM OF MEASURING FACE ATTRACTIVENESS BY USING PSL SCALE.
For example in this thread OP claims that "PSL 5 is equivalent to 84.15%" and PSL 5 =HTN. In another thread by different OP
Male Attractiveness (Face) is NOT Normally Distributed
Normal Distribution Implies You See Just as Many Ugly People as Good Looking Ones, which I don't agree with tbh. First off, this is my rating scale for PSL. You can agree or disagree with the exactness, but allow me ± .25 in digression. Sub 4 PSL (Normie-ish and Below) 4-4.75 PSL (Normie to...
looksmax.org
Reason 2
Absolutely wrong distribution.
Furthemore, this is what OP1 think how HTN (15/100 or 3/20) look like
Typical HTN in Mumbai..........
Besides that, this is what OP2 think how weak Chadlite (10-15/100, or 2-3/20) look like
He also said that " weak chadlites are (15/100 or 3/20), mid level chadlites are 5-10/100 (1-2/20) and strong chadlites (Chalamet/Ronaldo) are 2/100."
So according to this OP, in average class or group of 20 males, would be 3 weak chadlites and 1 mid chadlites. For dumbasses, that's completely wrong.
Reason 3
Nobody can tell differences between examples (not real life attitude) of HTN , Chadlites, Chads in PSL scale.
OP1 said that Timoti is 5 PSL and Ronaldo is 5.5 PSL. WTF, this is PSL, only face analysis not body, status or money.
OP2 said that Timoti and Ronaldo are strong chadlites. JFL....
Reason 4
Doesn't take into account the location
Let's return to this picture
Do you really think, that these asians dudes will be consider chadlites in Sweden or Germany? Most likely no.
However, in Asia they would be Chads.
Nevertheless, you can say that they're chadlites among Asian and etc. But at this point, PSl loses all its relevance because now, you don't compete with males of your own race for pussies, you compete with males of different races.
So, we have to make a new scale to measure attractiveness. PSL is gone.
@5.5psl @Prettyboy @Dr. Bruh @forevermirin @justshower @pneumocystosis @thecel
