PSL =/= SMV

no I’m not telling you that psl and objective statistics do not correlate with smv due to confounding variables, u just completely strawmanned me but I’ll clarify

I’m saying that to make such an over extrapolated claim (psl =/= smv) you would have to see it applied consistently universally, I never did say it was impossible for culture to influence smv, I just said it’s an exception to the rule(and I don’t think two groups of distinct people with niche preferences disproves it)
In other words this thread is extremely water(to an extent)
 
no I’m not telling you that psl and objective statistics do not correlate with smv due to confounding variables(although it’s part of it), u just completely strawmanned me but I’ll clarify

I’m saying that to make such an over extrapolated claim (psl =/= smv) you would have to see it applied consistently universally, I never did say it was impossible for culture to influence smv, I just said it’s an exception to the rule(and I don’t think two groups of distinct people with niche preferences disproves it)
2/7 major groups disprove it

A outlier must occur 5% of the time or less for it to be deemed statistically insignificant

You're objectively wrong.
 
Water thread for anyone with above a double digit IQ

But midwits like @pajjeetslayer are under the assumption these two values are EXACTLY the same

They are not.

There are no races with lower PSL than blacks, and asians.

Blacks, monkey pheno, genuinely look like prehistoric animals, im not even trying to be disrespectful or exaggerate, but I've literally seen black women who look EXACTLY like apes. It's uncanny and kind of disturbing

Same goes for Asians,

You might say the Korean SMV is largely a result of pop stars and the best looking Koreans in media

Even kpop idols, the highest tier of asians, still have extremely bad ratios,

These individuals should be immensely less attractive as rated by females, but they are not.

View attachment 4141141View attachment 4141142
 
2/7 major groups disprove it

A outlier must occur 5% of the time or less for it to be deemed statistically insignificant

You're objectively wrong.
Okay so now you want to get into numbers? Let’s take into account population sizes then,

JFL

IMG 0196


So yes, these are still niches groups that don’t explain the rule for the majority of 90% of people….

Why are you trying to bring up statistical significance? I never said that these cofactors were underpowered or underrepresented, do you know what statistical significance is?
 
i say uhh i love everyon in here > smv/psl/appeal/looks/tiktok/
 
@Gaygymmaxx ban this low iq junky

It was sarcasm you fucking idiot
Join date: Jun 16th, 2024

I see this take on TikTok all the time, so I thought u were just another low iq TikTokcel
 
I’m just guessing
You haven’t sent your full face but from what I saw you’re not touching chadlite
Idk you guys call me narcy but it’s really you guys who look like shit and are terrified to expose your full face because deep down you know you’re nothing. I have no fears like that because I know I’m better than you. Like you’re too arrogant for someone who looks so retarded lol. Thinking your accutane will turn you into a chadlite. Get real dumb ass. If you want reality to hit post your full face right now. It’s genuinely hilarious that yo say blacks cap at htn but that YOU can look as retarded and weird looking as you do and think you can look better than all blacks. People would laugh at you if you thought you could mog Keith powers in a side by side w your harmony and features you dagger nosed deathnic
He’s larping he doesn’t actually believe that he’s baiting probably
 

Similar threads

D
Replies
6
Views
263
Deleted member 168554
D
Sloppyseconds
Replies
16
Views
3K
lightswinning
lightswinning
got.daim
Replies
70
Views
4K
IraniancelV2
IraniancelV2
TheBlackpilledOne
Replies
6
Views
584
DirtyBlonde
DirtyBlonde
Ctrozo
Replies
119
Views
6K
pinkmenarefeminine
pinkmenarefeminine

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top