
Vantablack
No Light Escapes
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2025
- Posts
- 989
- Reputation
- 2,040
Mogger race, no other pajeet even comes close
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
thanks for the history lesson bhai. im looking more into south asian genetics and its pretty fascinating.Khatris originated in Pakistan, more specifically in northern Punjab. They migrated, along with Aroras, to India after partition in 1947. There were Khatris in my village too, since they packed their bags and migrated to India (not forcibly). Khatris, along with Rors and Jats (both originated in Pakistan as well, btw) and Kamboh/Kamboj (originated in eastern Afghanistan or eastern Iran but mixed with locals) have the lowest SAHG among South Asians, so to say they're blessed makes sense.
No problem, I didn't know about these things until I got into South Asian genetics. No, Jats are not the same as Punjabi Jatts. Jats live in Haryana and western Uttar Pradesh. They migrated there from Sindh, Pakistan. Rors and Jats (especially Rors) have the highest Steppe ancestry. Aside from high Steppe, they also have low SAHG for South Asian standards. That's why they cluster away from other South Asians, who have high SAHG and low Steppe in general.thanks for the history lesson bhai. im looking more into south asian genetics and its pretty fascinating.
Jats are the same as @Jatt ? Havent heard of kamboh but it sounds interesting
Imo mogger punjabi races should have their own country tbh
View attachment 3924055
Us Punjabi kangz have been tryna make our own countrythanks for the history lesson bhai. im looking more into south asian genetics and its pretty fascinating.
Jats are the same as @Jatt ? Havent heard of kamboh but it sounds interesting
Imo mogger punjabi races should have their own country tbh
View attachment 3924055
No problem, I didn't know about these things until I got into South Asian genetics. No, Jats are not the same as Punjabi Jatts. Jats live in Haryana and western Uttar Pradesh. They migrated there from Sindh, Pakistan. Rors and Jats (especially Rors) have the highest Steppe ancestry. Aside from high Steppe, they also have low SAHG for South Asian standards. That's why they cluster away from other South Asians, who have high SAHG and low Steppe in general.
Never gonna happen bhaiUs Punjabi kangz have been tryna make our own country
2 possible scenarios
A united state of punjab
Combing both Pakistan and India’s Punjab
Or Khalistan a Sikh state
IIRC, Jats and Rors actually fall outside of the caste system, they were originally never a part of it. They were later added in, and their origins as pastoralists may have been the contributing factor as to why they're considered low caste, although to be honest I don't think they're considered low caste, they have even more Steppe than the high castes aka Brahmins.View attachment 3924075
i found this graphic. if the rors and jats have highest steppe why are they still considered low caste? i thought steppe ancestry was proportionate to caste?
We can only dream
For now…
Bengalis have a lot of East Asian ancestry (from a Tibetan source), so they are actually mogger as a result (maybe not phenotypically, but definitely genetically).Over for Bangalis. Even our models and movie stars look like subhumans.
Like a seaBengalis have a lot of East Asian ancestry (from a Tibetan source), so they are actually mogger as a result (maybe not phenotypically, but definitely genetically).
damn didnt know that. makes sense, indian caste system is pretty interesting tooIIRC, Jats and Rors actually fall outside of the caste system, they were originally never a part of it. They were later added in, and their origins as pastoralists may have been the contributing factor as to why they're considered low caste, although to be honest I don't think they're considered low caste, they have even more Steppe than the high castes aka Brahmins.
Ah yes, that's their subhumanity trait, they mainly eat fish.Like a sea
i had a bengali friend once, chill guy but he was a manlet and smelled like shitOver for Bangalis. Even our models and movie stars look like subhumans.
are u pakistani bhai?Jinnah said to Sikhs, "Come join us, you'll get all the rights you want" and Sikhs were like "no saar ve vant dindu domination," otherwise all of Punjab would have fallen under one country at least.![]()
It's definitely interesting, but it's also flawed. For example, Brahmins are the highest caste, followed by Kshatriyas, Vaishyas and then Shudras at the bottom with Dalits being seen as so low that that they're simply considered Untouchables. But it was the Kshatriyas that defended the soil from foreign invaders, oftentimes successfully and other times not. Wouldn't it be logical to put the warriors at the top as they are defending the system to begin with? I would argue that these warriors should have been at the top, but alas... don't expect it to make sense, a lot of the mythology makes no sense either so it is what it is.damn didnt know that. makes sense, indian caste system is pretty interesting too
Sounds about right, don't think I've ever seen a tall Bengali.i had a bengali friend once, chill guy but he was a manlet and smelled like shit
Brahmins are so overrated and useless faggotsIt's definitely interesting, but it's also flawed. For example, Brahmins are the highest caste, followed by Kshatriyas, Vaishyas and then Shudras at the bottom with Dalits being seen as so low that that they're simply considered Untouchables. But it was the Kshatriyas that defended the soil from foreign invaders, oftentimes successfully and other times not. Wouldn't it be logical to put the warriors at the top as they are defending the system to begin with? I would argue that these warriors should have been at the top, but alas... don't expect it to make sense, a lot of the mythology makes no sense either so it is what it is.
Bhai my family migrated from Bangladesh to Bengal. We wuzz kangzz and shit during 12th to 15th century.Bengalis have a lot of East Asian ancestry (from a Tibetan source), so they are actually mogger as a result (maybe not phenotypically, but definitely genetically).
Yes they max out at 5'7 and tall and fair ones have weird looking faces and narrow shoulders.i had a bengali friend once, chill guy but he was a manlet and smelled like shit
I think it depends on the type of Kshatriya though? For example the Kings etc would generally have a lot more privelages than the common soldier, even though both are Kshatriya?It's definitely interesting, but it's also flawed. For example, Brahmins are the highest caste, followed by Kshatriyas, Vaishyas and then Shudras at the bottom with Dalits being seen as so low that that they're simply considered Untouchables. But it was the Kshatriyas that defended the soil from foreign invaders, oftentimes successfully and other times not. Wouldn't it be logical to put the warriors at the top as they are defending the system to begin with? I would argue that these warriors should have been at the top, but alas... don't expect it to make sense, a lot of the mythology makes no sense either so it is what it is.
Yes, I'm Pakistani. Punjabi (culturally). I took a DNA test last year and with my raw data file I was able to compare myself to others (autosomally) through Vahaduo (website with genetic calculators). As you can see, I have a genetic distance of 2.72 to Khatris. I included Aroras too, which are considered a sister group to Khatris. A genetic distance between 0 and 3 is generally considered to be a "good match" but realistically speaking, it's still distant and not as close as it seems. To put it into perspective, it's the same genetic distance between Croatians (Balkans or Southeastern Europe) and Hungarians (Central Europe).are u pakistani bhai?
Not necessarily, some Kshatriyas have higher Steppe than Brahmins (typically the Gangetic Kshatriyas). And like I said, Rors and Jats have the highest Steppe in South Asia, akin to northern Europeans.I think it depends on the type of Kshatriya though? For example the Kings etc would generally have a lot more privelages than the common soldier, even though both are Kshatriya?
Also im guesding the brahims have higher steppe genetics?
South Asia is very diverse genetically, only second to Africa. For this reason, it's called a subcontinent even though it's part of the Eurasian continent. Pakistanis do not have a caste system since the caste system is the result of a religion and Pakistanis do not have those religious beliefs, especially after we became Islamic. In Pakistan, caste just refers to what kind of specific Punjabi you are. For instance, you have Jatts, Gujjars, Awans, etc. So, when someone asks you what your caste is, they just mean "Are you Jatt or are you Gujjar or are you Awan?"also @Gengar i am curious, considering pakis and indians were the same ppl, do pakis have castes as well? i have never actually spoken to a paki before so this is interesting
mogged by us trve gangetic aryan brahman kangsAlright, here's the genetic map of "South Asia" (this actually includes ancient, Central Asian and West Asian populations, so I took the liberty to remove those).
View attachment 3924129
On the left side of the map, you have populations that originated in modern-day India, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh, and on the right side you have populations that originated in modern-day Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iran and Tajikistan. As you can see, Kamboj (in green) and Ror (in brown) are on the right side of the genetic map, even though they now live in India. This is because they originate from elsewhere, further west than modern-day India. While you can't see them on this map, the Jat (not Punjabi Jatts) cluster with the Ror as well. Khatris would laos cluster there, close to the Kamboj, Ror and Jats. Again, this is because they originated in modern-day Pakistan (with the exception of the Kamboj, who were historically an eastern Iranian group that later migrated eastwards and mixed with proper South Asians).
@Vantablack
Brahmins are like right in the middle of this map, between Kshatriya and Gujarati, IIRC. Or between Kshatriya and Gujar.mogged by us trve gangetic aryan brahman kangs
mogged by us trve gangetic aryan brahman kangs
I just checked, they fall between Gujaratis and Gujars.Brahmins are like right in the middle of this map, between Kshatriya and Gujarati, IIRC. Or between Kshatriya and Gujar.
if u look "curry" then u r curryWhat's so funny, @Lightskin Ethnic?![]()
This is genetics we're talking about. Science is objective; it has no biases. It just seeks out the truth, and I shared that here. Nothing wrong with that.if u look "curry" then u r curry
muhh ancestry is pure cope now as we all are heavily mixed
This is genetics we're talking about. Science is objective; it has no biases. It just seeks out the truth, and I shared that here. Nothing wrong with that.
Ehh they're mostly all brown, people just like to cherrypick the outliers. But in any case, the reason you don't look as South Asian as other South Asians is because you have lower AASI compared to them. Idk your AASI levels though, can't guess that, but it's probably in the high 20s or low 30s. Needs genetic testing for that. We're already an under-studied group of people, tbh, but that's also because of AASI which is a ghost population (meaning we don't have remains of these AASI people) so that makes it even more difficult.only pashtuns, kalashis and himachalis are non-curry passing curries per capita who have retained their ancestries to an extent
even i am a cherrypicked exampled for any south asian clan
Trve aryans bvlled the AASI, created us and left usEhh they're mostly all brown, people just like to cherrypick the outliers. But in any case, the reason you don't look as South Asian as other South Asians is because you have lower AASI compared to them. Idk your AASI levels though, can't guess that, but it's probably in the high 20s or low 30s. Needs genetic testing for that. We're already an under-studied group of people, tbh, but that's also because of AASI which is a ghost population (meaning we don't have remains of these AASI people) so that makes it even more difficult.
Rors are the most trve Aryans since they have insane Steppe levels, they're akin to northern Europeans when it comes to Steppe levels. Then closely followed by Jats. But then again, I saw a Rajasthani Jat with 44.4% Steppe and this is what he looks like:Trve aryans bvlled the AASI, created us and left us️
OP isn't Indian, anyway what Indian ethnic group were you again?Picking cherries is the second favorite past time of Indians
He might look different with a red tanRors are the most trve Aryans since they have insane Steppe levels, they're akin to northern Europeans when it comes to Steppe levels. Then closely followed by Jats. But then again, I saw a Rajasthani Jat with 44.4% Steppe and this is what he looks like:
View attachment 3924238![]()
Kek, doesn't look that different from the average northern Indian who has half of his Steppe. Goes to show, once again, that genotype =/= phenotype. That ties in with the point you were making, and what I was agreeing with (although you came at it from another angle, kek).
Probably. If you saw this guy, what'd you think he is?He might look different with a red tan
First is gooning to Pakistani foidsPicking cherries is the second favorite past time of Indians
I am pure Steppe Bvll Stallion.OP isn't Indian, anyway what Indian ethnic group were you again?![]()
Average tutor from Madhya Pradesh
Features are jeet but coloring is Iranic
Only those who get to milk a cow are privileged to unlock BVLL genes. Others look like thisRor bhai.![]()
Are you Haryanvi? That means you look like this, right?Only those who get to milk a cow are privileged to unlock BVLL genes. Others look like this
View attachment 3924263
But being on .org would have me believe that most Haryanvis like that guy live this life
View attachment 3924266
I amAre you Haryanvi? That means you look like this, right?
(NVM, I was gonna post a Himachali).