PSLgodBlackPerson
Trolling Greys, Makes you Cum everyday
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2025
- Posts
- 809
- Reputation
- 446
Name a punjabi who doesn't mog the living shit out of you on this forum
"Well.... heres my friend lol" - Responses are going to be 99% jokes because
THEY ARE COPING
-----Wealth-------
----------------------
"Muh SMV mog", what do you think Dimo and Attraction all proxy off of, Yes its strength, but what did
strength get you paleolithic era? Ohh whispers.... Power. WHAT DOES WEALTH PROXY? POWER!
This why jeff bezo's will SMV mogged you to oblivion despite being less appealing or dimorphic
The 9/10 average to higher average income will always get mogged by the 3/10 wealthy counterpart.
Wealth is so important as an SMV mog that all of our ancestory ties back to a few WEALTHY rich men because they
populated the most. 10 BILLION PEOPLE DESCEND FROM THE MOST WEALTHIEST PEOPLE, NOT THE MOST
ATTRACTIVE.
-----IQ Mogged-------
----------------------
"We are far superior to ethnics just look at our IQ"
Yes lets look at IQ and what predicts it and why we still
dominate even by white supremacist logic
"Higher IQ people are ALMOST always more wealthier"
according to a Swedish study this is true.
N = 3 Million
Correlation = 81%
"But muh Cold Winter Hypothesis"
Cold winter Hypothesis has almost no correlation with IQ according to PGS, instead higher lattitude countries
have higher selection for autistic traits, which supported divergent thinking in environments which selected for it
which would explain great philosophers and inventors in europe/asia (multi factoral though) being autistic. Sorry
I rather prefer genetic studies over people implying racial differences based on very multifactoral population statistics. You don't
even have to look at gene prevalence to see this to be true, ethnic groups who evolved in winter climates guess what...
What selected for IQ instead? How early a civilization reached the neolithic period.
"Well.... heres my friend lol" - Responses are going to be 99% jokes because
THEY ARE COPING
-----Wealth-------
----------------------
"Muh SMV mog", what do you think Dimo and Attraction all proxy off of, Yes its strength, but what did
strength get you paleolithic era? Ohh whispers.... Power. WHAT DOES WEALTH PROXY? POWER!
This why jeff bezo's will SMV mogged you to oblivion despite being less appealing or dimorphic
The 9/10 average to higher average income will always get mogged by the 3/10 wealthy counterpart.
Wealth is so important as an SMV mog that all of our ancestory ties back to a few WEALTHY rich men because they
populated the most. 10 BILLION PEOPLE DESCEND FROM THE MOST WEALTHIEST PEOPLE, NOT THE MOST
ATTRACTIVE.
-----IQ Mogged-------
----------------------
"We are far superior to ethnics just look at our IQ"
Yes lets look at IQ and what predicts it and why we still
dominate even by white supremacist logic
"Higher IQ people are ALMOST always more wealthier"
according to a Swedish study this is true.
N = 3 Million
Correlation = 81%
"But muh Cold Winter Hypothesis"
Cold winter Hypothesis has almost no correlation with IQ according to PGS, instead higher lattitude countries
have higher selection for autistic traits, which supported divergent thinking in environments which selected for it
which would explain great philosophers and inventors in europe/asia (multi factoral though) being autistic. Sorry
I rather prefer genetic studies over people implying racial differences based on very multifactoral population statistics. You don't
even have to look at gene prevalence to see this to be true, ethnic groups who evolved in winter climates guess what...
What selected for IQ instead? How early a civilization reached the neolithic period.
Guess whos the earliest? Oh indians/Middle easterners?
"But muh Richard Lynn"
He is widely disregarded in most IQ studies who are actually investigating IQ differences between populations.
Most studies have to formulate or redo IQ testings on populations due to the severely terrible practices he used in efforts
to create his book and hypothesis exhibit A would be GWAS lmfao. He tested "...mentally retarded and disabled kids in Senegal so we had to exclude Senegalese IQ results" - A quote from a study conducting racial differences in IQ, he also tested a small group of Somalian children who were malnourished to represent country differences. If you think this doesn't show obvious incline for bias which most researchers don't even reference studies conducted in such a manner, then YOU ARE COPING
He also never adjusted for the Flynn effect, SES, Wilson effect (IQ is becomes very variable, it can up shoot or decrease alot depending on intellectual exposure
which obviously neo colonized nations have the shit end of the stick, while danish people benefit from it being children exposed to the best education at ages 1, which he tested teens without controlling for this, this is why the IQ of german immigrants were so low, being 85), Parental education, Birth conditions, etc, etc. When you make a claim like intellectually superior groups in this manner, its not a claim, its not a fact, its not a theory, its a fucking hypothesis. Further disproving the cold winter hypothesis
You know what a study did do when reanalzying IQ differences using Adoption, they corrected for only one factor, Attrition; and then
disproved Jesens point of the "IQ gap widening through age", a whole point based on a factor he didn't care less to control for.
91 IQ was the end result when controlling for this, the average of many developed
developed nations in Europe and around the world. Not the classic 60-80 IQ narrative.
A PGS study also proved that the FST of cognitive Alleles vs africans is only 0.11,Normal variation, and this contributed to a 8 IQ gap (not controlling for PGS measurement errors which will be common and major when measuring group differences). This is also factoring in Groups which are just as divergent from west africans and other african groupsas they are european groups, which can significantly increase error rate and also widen the gapas some groups are distant hunter gatherer groups which hunter gatherer groups typically havealleles negatively associated with IQ.Further disproving the cold winter hypothesis
"Mayo's when you reference nuance in any race study"
"Mayo's when you use there own logic against them"
"Whites dominate in economics and power, while ethnics don't, we
must practive horrible scientific method and say Correlation = Causation and we are smarter!"
"Indians dominate whites in economics in countries they migrated to as the minority (despite whites being the majority in most contexts and having more power and stealing 46 trillion from indian inhabitants), and soon to be powerful in all populations they inhabit
with an environment more racist to them than there homeland (don't use our homeland against us, being born into a society which values nepotism, exploitation of the poor, isn't a internal IQ problem rather a rigid and hard to fix system which plagues or will plague all socities the longer they progress"
Indian architecture
(Many pieces were made thousands of years before Europeans knew to stop
having sex with there siblings and hiding in caves)
People who created the basis of math and complex mathematical concepts which cum skins tried to claim
they did first (only 2 thousand years later when they started industerializing
)
"But we raped your kids and women and conquered you"
Yes, so your neanderthal ancestor impulses wanted you to conquere and rape kids/women how "Civilized" and "intelligent", lets compare your thought processing to actual civilized and intelligent civilizations.. Many chinese emperors had the chance to colonize and explore but focused on domestic conflict and maintaining peace as which they did for the sake of there peoples better wellbeing and did so with high success maintaining majority peace for about a thousand years until the parasite neanderthals came in.
"But we mog you, in dating statistics
"Jarvis pull up dating statistics, GOT EMM"
"Jarvis pull up nuance which whites always hate due to it always breaking or minimizing
their racist theories created to cope for their Autistic Virgin life non accomplishing life"
Dates on dating apps are 20% long term, rest short term. Dimorphism is also a factor, not attraction. When females assess short term relationships they go by dimorphism, due to cultural influences and unfortunetly some facial attonomy, Asians are precieved as more feminine, which is negatively correlated with short term success. Dating apps are composed mostly composed of white women (for females),
People obviously do it with there own race the majority of the time. This factor inflates this, populations with less people where these dating apps
are most composed of will be underperformers most of the time, Asians for example. This is also why Blacks typically have more sexual success than
whites despite dating statistics showing otherwise. These are also inflated by the positive exposure to whites that media typically inclines towards while
ethnics, guess what, show the least developed area of africa and asia, look at these shit flingers and eaters, look at these spearchuckers.
This is like pulling up to rural white america and recording meth addicts and incest babies and exclusively showing this
and saying "look at these incest creatures, poor, uncivilized, retards"
Why do race copers cling towards racist ideology and come with a certain phenotype?
Most of the time they are losers, Autistic and are ugly due to factors I'll explain. They typically like to show achievement from their race. Nothing
wrong with it, this post did the same thing, however uniquely base their whole identity, friend group, and superiority on this factor:
Whole digital identity based on his race (mostly slavic person btw)
Notice how most normal people don't do this, even racists blending into society don't even care to much about it to make it their whole idenitity. This is because they have pride in their personal success, and are more socially advantagous. People who are social rejects, are typically autistic which is also why when you point out nuance in there arguments they rage or spam ad hominems because they logically can't grasp or consider a different and altering factor into there belief system thats set in stone which is common behavior in autists, they also self admittedly state they are ND or on the spectrum in this forum. They are also more ugly (major contributor to social rejection), and for this being true they lack social expertise to understand or empathize with differing cultures than there own as of why they are typically seen as social rejects.
Not a mayo but I added this in since its the FIRST RESPONSE TO MY POST, doing the same thing, blaming internal failures, on external
causes, this is coping, which is what mayo's do with there so called "superiority". He doesn't even represent the average of the indian population and removes the diversity of it, hes instead projects his own failures whether that be determined or not onto a population which he doesn't even majorily represent. Worst of the worst, he even says "I am above average for my race" no ethnic group has an FWHR of 1, a malformed mandible, like yours @Resonance .
"But muh Richard Lynn"
He is widely disregarded in most IQ studies who are actually investigating IQ differences between populations.
Most studies have to formulate or redo IQ testings on populations due to the severely terrible practices he used in efforts
to create his book and hypothesis exhibit A would be GWAS lmfao. He tested "...mentally retarded and disabled kids in Senegal so we had to exclude Senegalese IQ results" - A quote from a study conducting racial differences in IQ, he also tested a small group of Somalian children who were malnourished to represent country differences. If you think this doesn't show obvious incline for bias which most researchers don't even reference studies conducted in such a manner, then YOU ARE COPING
He also never adjusted for the Flynn effect, SES, Wilson effect (IQ is becomes very variable, it can up shoot or decrease alot depending on intellectual exposure
which obviously neo colonized nations have the shit end of the stick, while danish people benefit from it being children exposed to the best education at ages 1, which he tested teens without controlling for this, this is why the IQ of german immigrants were so low, being 85), Parental education, Birth conditions, etc, etc. When you make a claim like intellectually superior groups in this manner, its not a claim, its not a fact, its not a theory, its a fucking hypothesis. Further disproving the cold winter hypothesis
You know what a study did do when reanalzying IQ differences using Adoption, they corrected for only one factor, Attrition; and then
disproved Jesens point of the "IQ gap widening through age", a whole point based on a factor he didn't care less to control for.
91 IQ was the end result when controlling for this, the average of many developed
developed nations in Europe and around the world. Not the classic 60-80 IQ narrative.
A PGS study also proved that the FST of cognitive Alleles vs africans is only 0.11,Normal variation, and this contributed to a 8 IQ gap (not controlling for PGS measurement errors which will be common and major when measuring group differences). This is also factoring in Groups which are just as divergent from west africans and other african groupsas they are european groups, which can significantly increase error rate and also widen the gapas some groups are distant hunter gatherer groups which hunter gatherer groups typically havealleles negatively associated with IQ.Further disproving the cold winter hypothesis
"Mayo's when you reference nuance in any race study"
"Mayo's when you use there own logic against them"
"Whites dominate in economics and power, while ethnics don't, we
must practive horrible scientific method and say Correlation = Causation and we are smarter!"
"Indians dominate whites in economics in countries they migrated to as the minority (despite whites being the majority in most contexts and having more power and stealing 46 trillion from indian inhabitants), and soon to be powerful in all populations they inhabit
with an environment more racist to them than there homeland (don't use our homeland against us, being born into a society which values nepotism, exploitation of the poor, isn't a internal IQ problem rather a rigid and hard to fix system which plagues or will plague all socities the longer they progress"
Indian architecture
(Many pieces were made thousands of years before Europeans knew to stop
having sex with there siblings and hiding in caves)
People who created the basis of math and complex mathematical concepts which cum skins tried to claim
they did first (only 2 thousand years later when they started industerializing
)
"But we raped your kids and women and conquered you
"Yes, so your neanderthal ancestor impulses wanted you to conquere and rape kids/women how "Civilized" and "intelligent", lets compare your thought processing to actual civilized and intelligent civilizations.. Many chinese emperors had the chance to colonize and explore but focused on domestic conflict and maintaining peace as which they did for the sake of there peoples better wellbeing and did so with high success maintaining majority peace for about a thousand years until the parasite neanderthals came in.
"But we mog you, in dating statistics
"Jarvis pull up dating statistics, GOT EMM
""Jarvis pull up nuance which whites always hate due to it always breaking or minimizing
their racist theories created to cope for their Autistic Virgin life non accomplishing life"
Dates on dating apps are 20% long term, rest short term. Dimorphism is also a factor, not attraction. When females assess short term relationships they go by dimorphism, due to cultural influences and unfortunetly some facial attonomy, Asians are precieved as more feminine, which is negatively correlated with short term success. Dating apps are composed mostly composed of white women (for females),
People obviously do it with there own race the majority of the time. This factor inflates this, populations with less people where these dating apps
are most composed of will be underperformers most of the time, Asians for example. This is also why Blacks typically have more sexual success than
whites despite dating statistics showing otherwise. These are also inflated by the positive exposure to whites that media typically inclines towards while
ethnics, guess what, show the least developed area of africa and asia, look at these shit flingers and eaters, look at these spearchuckers.
This is like pulling up to rural white america and recording meth addicts and incest babies and exclusively showing this
and saying "look at these incest creatures, poor, uncivilized, retards"
Why do race copers cling towards racist ideology and come with a certain phenotype?
Most of the time they are losers, Autistic and are ugly due to factors I'll explain. They typically like to show achievement from their race. Nothing
wrong with it, this post did the same thing, however uniquely base their whole identity, friend group, and superiority on this factor:
Whole digital identity based on his race (mostly slavic person btw)
Notice how most normal people don't do this, even racists blending into society don't even care to much about it to make it their whole idenitity. This is because they have pride in their personal success, and are more socially advantagous. People who are social rejects, are typically autistic which is also why when you point out nuance in there arguments they rage or spam ad hominems because they logically can't grasp or consider a different and altering factor into there belief system thats set in stone which is common behavior in autists, they also self admittedly state they are ND or on the spectrum in this forum. They are also more ugly (major contributor to social rejection), and for this being true they lack social expertise to understand or empathize with differing cultures than there own as of why they are typically seen as social rejects.
Not a mayo but I added this in since its the FIRST RESPONSE TO MY POST, doing the same thing, blaming internal failures, on external
causes, this is coping, which is what mayo's do with there so called "superiority". He doesn't even represent the average of the indian population and removes the diversity of it, hes instead projects his own failures whether that be determined or not onto a population which he doesn't even majorily represent. Worst of the worst, he even says "I am above average for my race" no ethnic group has an FWHR of 1, a malformed mandible, like yours @Resonance .
Attachments
Last edited:
