QOVES, getting punched in the face has to do with robust bones

[GuyFromSingapore]

Mogged by Nate Diaz

 

[Carlitos1698]

Just have someone constantly kick the shit out of your face to get robust face theory

 

[macdaddy]

well it is much simpler than this..the whole reason people look more and more fucked up is domestication.
just compare non-domesticated animals with domesticated ones:

Why so many domesticated mammals have floppy ears

Why so many domesticated mammals have floppy ears

www.iflscience.com

Although selected only for their temperament, the later generations of silver foxes also had shorter faces, smaller teeth, soft and droopy ears, curly tails and altered colour.

Also it took only 20 generations to create this new fox "species" and not millions of years like evolutionists like to theorize, because genotypes and phenotypes are much more adaptive than people think. Every horse-like creature comes from an ancient horse, every fish from a proto-fish, but not even in a trillion years will bacteria evolve into a human - but that is another story.

 

[GuyFromSingapore]

not millions of years like evolutionists like to theorize, because genotypes and phenotypes are much more adaptive than people think.

Ok creationist.

 

[PURE ARYAN GENETICS]

well it is much simpler than this..the whole reason people look more and more fucked up is domestication.
just compare non-domesticated animals with domesticated ones:

Why so many domesticated mammals have floppy ears

Why so many domesticated mammals have floppy ears

www.iflscience.com

Also it took only 20 generations to create this new fox "species" and not millions of years like evolutionists like to theorize, because genotypes and phenotypes are much more adaptive than people think. Every horse-like creature comes from an ancient horse, every fish from a proto-fish, but not even in a trillion years will bacteria evolve into a human - but that is another story.

behavior, dominance, hormones and looks go hand in hand

 

[macdaddy]

Ok creationist.

I am a realist, you can argue on the basis of logic and hard evidence with me but not with peer pressure.

.) entropy does not allow higher order to form out of chaos (that's just the credo of the freemasons funny enough), so no formation of complex structures out of crap.
.) there is no gain of information through mutation, only loss. (like a book loses information with random deletions of words, letters)
.) there is no gain of bio-diversity through natural selection, but a loss of diversity because one of a kind is disregarded in every selective step, so one species of bacteria would have reigned superior and evolution would have stopped right there.
.) proteins are highly complex in nature and also need fully functioning proteins to catalyze, fold and synthesize them to be even fully functioning - which begs the questions was there already fully functioning protein that helps with creating other fully functioning protein, or what the fuck is the logic here?
.) DNA is highly preserved, taking measures against any kind of mutations as it is not in the favor of the individual.
.) natural selection does not work, because you can not select a gene that is not fully expressed in the phenotype simply because...how could a female select for a gene that she can't even see and that does not even have an advantage yet? every selection must have been made by selecting a fully functioning new formed wing (for example)..but that is impossible because a wing can not just appear out of thin air.
.) and and and and..tried to keep it simple for your understanding, but there is tons of logical errors and anti-scientific interpreting in the evolution theory, all fantasy models and zero hard evidence.

 

[reptiles]

View attachment 2006324

Mogged by Nate Diaz

@Blackgymmax these are the curry looking white guys I was talking about a few weeks ago this picture perfectly encapsulates it round face ethnic beard puffy chin negative orbital vector giga recessed maxilla.

I mean for all intents are purposes this guy is a pale curry and I've seen a lot of anglos that look like this so like are these even ethnic traits at this point or just subhuman traits how can it be an ethnic trait when a lot of white people have the same traits.

 

[reptiles]

View attachment 2006324

Mogged by Nate Diaz

Wait so to sum up everything this vid said the ability to attract women is directly linked to traits which help you survive more in battle fuck it just confirms what I've been saying for a long time whores are literally built to attract males built for war the more I look into this shit the more depressing it becomes.

At this point crashing east might be the best bet forgetting about whores is the best bet

 

[HOLYFUARK]

I am a realist, you can argue on the basis of logic and hard evidence with me but not with peer pressure.

.) entropy does not allow higher order to form out of chaos (that's just the credo of the freemasons funny enough), so no formation of complex structures out of crap.
.) there is no gain of information through mutation, only loss. (like a book loses information with random deletions of words, letters)
.) there is no gain of bio-diversity through natural selection, but a loss of diversity because one of a kind is disregarded in every selective step, so one species of bacteria would have reigned superior and evolution would have stopped right there.
.) proteins are highly complex in nature and also need fully functioning proteins to catalyze, fold and synthesize them to be even fully functioning - which begs the questions was there already fully functioning protein that helps with creating other fully functioning protein, or what the fuck is the logic here?
.) DNA is highly preserved, taking measures against any kind of mutations as it is not in the favor of the individual.
.) natural selection does not work, because you can not select a gene that is not fully expressed in the phenotype simply because...how could a female select for a gene that she can't even see and that does not even have an advantage yet? every selection must have been made by selecting a fully functioning new formed wing (for example)..but that is impossible because a wing can not just appear out of thin air.
.) and and and and..tried to keep it simple for your understanding, but there is tons of logical errors and anti-scientific interpreting in the evolution theory, all fantasy models and zero hard evidence.

High iq post ngl , i also remember reading somewhere the odds for a functional protein randomly forming is 1 in 10^77 , in probability anything beyond 10^50 is considered impossible