Thecovenant
Verified gang rapist
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2022
- Posts
- 287
- Reputation
- 589
factoids he raised against pretty boys:
-Masculine faces get better rating by women
-Masculine features get better rating by women
-By not being on birth control women seem to prefer more masc faces, by being on birth control they prefer more fem (bull-cuck theory)
-Prettier the women -> more masc men she preferred
-better hip to waist ratio -> more masc she preffered
-better rated by other women -> more masc face she preferred
-being respected by other men and women more
arguements that could counter these
-The not masc faces will be just less attractive in general, meaning they will probably depict two sides, either more fem or more masc, by logic the more masc should be more attractive, longer ,wider chin, better jaw, more lean etc. It would be better to pick the fem and masc traits out and mix them together, like masc lower third fem nose etc, see which one gets the highest.
-Lot of contradicting research on birth control changing preferences or not
-same arguement as the above not counting in the attractiveness of the individual
-probably testing adult females not JBs.
-the last is true even if you are a pretty boi males wil think ur an easy target.
so this is why i think qoves is wrong, he misrepresented a fem face with a faggot who has square jaw , hollow cheeks etc, instead of a full on more feminine guy, also the study above misrepresented masc guys, masc traits include more shallow cheekbones, narrower/thinner lips, more receded hairline, it looks cherry picked.
QUESTION IS , CAN VINNIE HACKER LIKE TYPE MOG A MASC TYPE LIKE NICK BATEMAN? IT SEEMS LIKE IRL HE CAN.
let me know your thoughts niggers
@alriodai @Seth Walsh @Blackgymmax
-Masculine faces get better rating by women
-Masculine features get better rating by women
-By not being on birth control women seem to prefer more masc faces, by being on birth control they prefer more fem (bull-cuck theory)
-Prettier the women -> more masc men she preferred
-better hip to waist ratio -> more masc she preffered
-better rated by other women -> more masc face she preferred
-being respected by other men and women more
arguements that could counter these
-The not masc faces will be just less attractive in general, meaning they will probably depict two sides, either more fem or more masc, by logic the more masc should be more attractive, longer ,wider chin, better jaw, more lean etc. It would be better to pick the fem and masc traits out and mix them together, like masc lower third fem nose etc, see which one gets the highest.
-Lot of contradicting research on birth control changing preferences or not
-same arguement as the above not counting in the attractiveness of the individual
-probably testing adult females not JBs.
-the last is true even if you are a pretty boi males wil think ur an easy target.
so this is why i think qoves is wrong, he misrepresented a fem face with a faggot who has square jaw , hollow cheeks etc, instead of a full on more feminine guy, also the study above misrepresented masc guys, masc traits include more shallow cheekbones, narrower/thinner lips, more receded hairline, it looks cherry picked.
QUESTION IS , CAN VINNIE HACKER LIKE TYPE MOG A MASC TYPE LIKE NICK BATEMAN? IT SEEMS LIKE IRL HE CAN.
let me know your thoughts niggers
@alriodai @Seth Walsh @Blackgymmax