Question about natty muscle potential

audimax

audimax

Adidasmaxxed Chad
Joined
Dec 8, 2018
Posts
3,358
Reputation
3,807
Lets say you are near your natty potential but you have some deficient muscles, like calfes. If you train them, is it as easy so put on muscle on them if the rest of your body was proportionally skinny or is it harder because youve almost reached your natty FFMI?
 
interesting question, if your body has an X limitation of muscle that it can add on itself, is investing in X better than Y because it takes up the ''limit'' space? interesting ngl. the answer will probably be no, it does not matter. otherwise you could not train your legs at all and get much more results in the upper body (theoretically) beyond the matter of recovery, etc..and that shit doesn't happen.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: audimax and EasternRightWinger15
interesting question, if your body has an X limitation of muscle that it can add on itself, is investing in X better than Y because it takes up the ''limit'' space? interesting ngl. the answer will probably be no, it does not matter. otherwise you could not train your legs at all and get much more results in the upper body (theoretically) beyond the matter of recovery, etc..and that shit doesn't happen.
Im asking because lets say youre a natty gymcel but you have a low T pencil neck. If you started training neck, would you still make the same progress as a skinny guy?
 
Im asking because lets say youre a natty gymcel but you have a low T pencil neck. If you started training neck, would you still make the same progress as a skinny guy?

I answered that quite clearly, the answer is yes.
 
  • +1
Reactions: audimax and EasternRightWinger15

Similar threads

Chef227
Replies
2
Views
137
Chef227
Chef227
Part-Time Chad
Replies
24
Views
243
Part-Time Chad
Part-Time Chad
Brisy
Replies
7
Views
289
Brisy
Brisy
lilsub1
Replies
17
Views
642
lilsub1
lilsub1

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top