Quick caution for all FGFR-inhibitor users, high risk of deformity

ICL

ICL

hypsicranic
Joined
Nov 9, 2025
Posts
14,059
Reputation
20,601
I've been noticing many threads on taking FGFR(3) inhibitors recently, and I think many of these users have barely done any research;

At first, I felt like there are only studies and case studies for those with fgfr3 over-expression to inhibit it to normal (hence taller height), I'm not sure how making it underexpressed would yield a beneficial effect on height (an "worth it" effect) which is desirable or significant

Besides, FGFR3 is a brake for growth, it exists for a reason as it stops cartilage from becoming into bone. Inhibiting it to lower-than-normal makes me skeptic about possible deformation, or side effects. You'd be growing uncontrollably, unideal to your cells which are not perfect and will easily mess up.


Just look at children who used FGFR3 inhibitors, 42% of them develop SCFE, considered a medical emergency.

Erdafitinib had to be discontinued due to the patient's unusual rapid growth over the 9 months of therapy, severe kyphoscoliosis, and spinal cord compression with cervical myelopathy. The patient grew a total of 14.3 cm, or at an annualized growth of 19.06 cm (normal growth is ∼10 cm per year for a 15-year-old male).
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11152661/#:~:text=e-,rdafitinib had to be,15-year-old male).,-Growth
1781008437330

You may argue that this was a small group size of 7 patients, but, SCFE is an extremely rare condition, 3/7 which means this cannot be coincidence.

Impressively, one individual went from 170cm to 200cm in just 150 weeks, which is notable.

I assume you will not be using these in short cycles, as we've seen 50 weeks resulting in SCFE yet achieving 13cm of height

Another instance, those with congenital FGFR UNDERexpression usually grow tall but have deformities such as kyphosis, permanently bent fingers, etc; this is called CATSHL syndrome which makes you unusually tall while causing loss of function and making bones too long.

Is it really worth the height growth it gives you?

They also look similar to those who are marfanoid;
1781008871401

so i'm not sure how practical it would be inhibiting it and if the stature gained from this is beneficial or desirable.

I'd like to see anyone that makes an FGFR3 thread countering these questions, which I'm looking forward to see if he'll bring something new to the table and address the dilemma's, especially the fact that some users contemplate Pan-FGFR inhibitors which would be egregious (case studies show fgfr1/2/3/4 inhibited yet caused a deformity, what would a pan-fgfr inhibitor do?)

@Vireon @anondude @N1kolai @81xa @chang cypionate
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: heinz_guderian, botchedbytufano, infrainfra and 17 others
Fear-momguering, nothing would actually happen
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: IWILLASCENDD, matin889, ICL and 3 others
I’ve seen so many people talk about them but no results I’m kinda interested in them
 
  • +1
Reactions: zennn, Paul.jnxy, 2s2f and 2 others
B
 
  • +1
Reactions: Masty, 2s2f and Deleted member 159945
THANK YOU FOR MAKING TS:peepoWave:

This was needed so bad because many people here are clueless and just listen "fgfr3 inhibitors grow height = good!!" so this cleared up many concerns


read every molecule btw
 
  • +1
Reactions: IWILLASCENDD, emo-ogre666, Sub5kang and 4 others
No i won't, my growth plates are closed and i'm not using fgfr3 inhibitors :feelshah:
The studies used are about those with open growth plates, hence your comment is 100% useless
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: matin889, PostivityCore, Masty and 2 others
The studies used are about those with open growth plates, hence your comment is 100% useless
Yeah i know
 
  • +1
Reactions: ICL, Deleted member 159945 and 2s2f
This is why you should stick to the mainstream stuff like HGH and AI's

Being a guinea pig for niche theoretical pharmaceutical methods its not a good idea
 
  • +1
Reactions: ICL, anondude, Masty and 1 other person
I've been noticing many threads on taking FGFR3 inhibitors recently, and I think many of these users have barely done any research;

At first, I felt like there are only studies and case studies for those with fgfr3 over-expression to inhibit it to normal (hence taller height), I'm not sure how making it underexpressed would yield a beneficial effect on height (an "worth it" effect) which is desirable or significant

Besides, FGFR3 is a brake for growth, it exists for a reason as it stops cartilage from becoming into bone. Inhibiting it to lower-than-normal makes me skeptic about possible deformation, or side effects. You'd be growing uncontrollably, unideal to your cells which are not perfect and will easily mess up.


Just look at children who used FGFR3 inhibitors, 42% of them develop SCFE, considered a medical emergency.

View attachment 5196212
You may argue that this was a small group size of 7 patients, but, SCFE is an extremely rare condition, 3/7 which means this cannot be coincidence.

Impressively, one individual went from 170cm to 200cm in just 150 weeks, which is notable.

I assume you will not be using these in short cycles, as we've seen 50 weeks resulting in SCFE yet achieving 13cm of height

Another instance, those with congenital FGFR UNDERexpression usually grow tall but have deformities such as kyphosis, permanently bent fingers, etc; this is called CATSHL syndrome which makes you unusually tall while causing loss of function and making bones too long.

Is it really worth the height growth it gives you?

They also look similar to those who are marfanoid;
View attachment 5196227
so i'm not sure how practical it would be inhibiting it and if the stature gained from this is beneficial or desirable.

I'd like to see anyone that makes an FGFR3 thread countering these questions, which I'm looking forward to see if he'll bring something new to the table and address the dilemma's, especially the fact that some users contemplate Pan-FGFR inhibitors which would be egregious (case studies show fgfr1/2/3/4 inhibited yet caused a deformity, what would a pan-fgfr inhibitor do?)

@Vireon @anondude @N1kolai @81xa @chang cypionate
I'm 30 years old, i have knee pain everyday do you think my plate are still open?
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: IWILLASCENDD, slaminet, matin889 and 6 others
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: matin889, pslmapper, ICL and 2 others
I'm 30 years old, i have knee pain everyday do you think my plate are still open?
Never over bro start blasting
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: IWILLASCENDD, matin889, pslmapper and 2 others
THANK YOU FOR MAKING TS:peepoWave:

This was needed so bad because many people here are clueless and just listen "fgfr3 inhibitors grow height = good!!" so this cleared up many concerns


read every molecule btw
If you look at "similar threads" section you'll see how there's endless threads on this.

1781010084407


I feel like this should be pinned (if true) since this is regarded as a dangerous compound right now @Gengar’s Ghost @Hernan @Randomized @DildoFaggins thots?
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Paul.jnxy, 2s2f and Deleted member 159945
If you look at "similar threads" section you'll see how there's endless threads on this.

View attachment 5196311

I feel like this should be pinned (if true) since this is regarded as a dangerous compound right now @Gengar’s Ghost @Hernan @Randomized @DildoFaggins thots?
Indeed it should

I support
 
  • +1
Reactions: brootaldood, Paul.jnxy and ICL
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Paul.jnxy, Deleted member 159945, ICL and 2 others
a fgfr3 inhibitors guide is needed, so much confusion on this. I might have to do it
 
  • +1
Reactions: brootaldood, Paul.jnxy, ICL and 1 other person
I've been noticing many threads on taking FGFR3 inhibitors recently, and I think many of these users have barely done any research;

At first, I felt like there are only studies and case studies for those with fgfr3 over-expression to inhibit it to normal (hence taller height), I'm not sure how making it underexpressed would yield a beneficial effect on height (an "worth it" effect) which is desirable or significant

Besides, FGFR3 is a brake for growth, it exists for a reason as it stops cartilage from becoming into bone. Inhibiting it to lower-than-normal makes me skeptic about possible deformation, or side effects. You'd be growing uncontrollably, unideal to your cells which are not perfect and will easily mess up.


Just look at children who used FGFR3 inhibitors, 42% of them develop SCFE, considered a medical emergency.

Erdafitinib had to be discontinued due to the patient's unusual rapid growth over the 9 months of therapy, severe kyphoscoliosis, and spinal cord compression with cervical myelopathy. The patient grew a total of 14.3 cm, or at an annualized growth of 19.06 cm (normal growth is ∼10 cm per year for a 15-year-old male).
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11152661/#:~:text=e-,rdafitinib had to be,15-year-old male).,-Growth
View attachment 5196212
You may argue that this was a small group size of 7 patients, but, SCFE is an extremely rare condition, 3/7 which means this cannot be coincidence.

Impressively, one individual went from 170cm to 200cm in just 150 weeks, which is notable.

I assume you will not be using these in short cycles, as we've seen 50 weeks resulting in SCFE yet achieving 13cm of height

Another instance, those with congenital FGFR UNDERexpression usually grow tall but have deformities such as kyphosis, permanently bent fingers, etc; this is called CATSHL syndrome which makes you unusually tall while causing loss of function and making bones too long.

Is it really worth the height growth it gives you?

They also look similar to those who are marfanoid;
View attachment 5196227
so i'm not sure how practical it would be inhibiting it and if the stature gained from this is beneficial or desirable.

I'd like to see anyone that makes an FGFR3 thread countering these questions, which I'm looking forward to see if he'll bring something new to the table and address the dilemma's, especially the fact that some users contemplate Pan-FGFR inhibitors which would be egregious (case studies show fgfr1/2/3/4 inhibited yet caused a deformity, what would a pan-fgfr inhibitor do?)

@Vireon @anondude @N1kolai @81xa @chang cypionate
I will make a thread bout this tonight. Il tag you. I agree with a bunch of your points and will point them out then :feelshah:
 
  • +1
Reactions: brootaldood, Deleted member 159945 and ICL
I've been noticing many threads on taking FGFR3 inhibitors recently, and I think many of these users have barely done any research;

At first, I felt like there are only studies and case studies for those with fgfr3 over-expression to inhibit it to normal (hence taller height), I'm not sure how making it underexpressed would yield a beneficial effect on height (an "worth it" effect) which is desirable or significant

Besides, FGFR3 is a brake for growth, it exists for a reason as it stops cartilage from becoming into bone. Inhibiting it to lower-than-normal makes me skeptic about possible deformation, or side effects. You'd be growing uncontrollably, unideal to your cells which are not perfect and will easily mess up.


Just look at children who used FGFR3 inhibitors, 42% of them develop SCFE, considered a medical emergency.

Erdafitinib had to be discontinued due to the patient's unusual rapid growth over the 9 months of therapy, severe kyphoscoliosis, and spinal cord compression with cervical myelopathy. The patient grew a total of 14.3 cm, or at an annualized growth of 19.06 cm (normal growth is ∼10 cm per year for a 15-year-old male).
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11152661/#:~:text=e-,rdafitinib had to be,15-year-old male).,-Growth
View attachment 5196212
You may argue that this was a small group size of 7 patients, but, SCFE is an extremely rare condition, 3/7 which means this cannot be coincidence.

Impressively, one individual went from 170cm to 200cm in just 150 weeks, which is notable.

I assume you will not be using these in short cycles, as we've seen 50 weeks resulting in SCFE yet achieving 13cm of height

Another instance, those with congenital FGFR UNDERexpression usually grow tall but have deformities such as kyphosis, permanently bent fingers, etc; this is called CATSHL syndrome which makes you unusually tall while causing loss of function and making bones too long.

Is it really worth the height growth it gives you?

They also look similar to those who are marfanoid;
View attachment 5196227
so i'm not sure how practical it would be inhibiting it and if the stature gained from this is beneficial or desirable.

I'd like to see anyone that makes an FGFR3 thread countering these questions, which I'm looking forward to see if he'll bring something new to the table and address the dilemma's, especially the fact that some users contemplate Pan-FGFR inhibitors which would be egregious (case studies show fgfr1/2/3/4 inhibited yet caused a deformity, what would a pan-fgfr inhibitor do?)

@Vireon @anondude @N1kolai @81xa @chang cypionate
True also there are not enough studies showing real growth besodes rats, side effects are too dangerous like blood pressure weaker bone osteoporosis, heart attacks for example from ky,tyra, and all the other knows fgfr3 inhibs, also i think cap ingibs go into the same category also i belive that during development u cant significanrly change you growth outcome by using anthing outside of the body
Mirin
I may be wrong only done research on ky and tyra 300 maybe there are some in wich the side effects are kinda none i dont belive it though bc u dont know how your body will react to it
Grey cell coping = me
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 159945, ICL and Paul.jnxy
I will make a thread bout this tonight. Il tag you. I agree with a bunch of your points and will point them out then :feelshah:
looking forward to it
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 159945, Paul.jnxy and N1kolai
True also there are not enough studies showing real growth besodes rats, side effects are too dangerous like blood pressure weaker bone osteoporosis, heart attacks for example from ky,tyra, and all the other knows fgfr3 inhibs, also i think cap ingibs go into the same category also i belive that during development u cant significanrly change you growth outcome by using anthing outside of the body
Mirin
I may be wrong only done research on ky and tyra 300 maybe there are some in wich the side effects are kinda none i dont belive it though bc u dont know how your body will react to it
Grey cell coping = me
@ICL
 
  • +1
Reactions: ICL and Deleted member 159945
a fgfr3 inhibitors guide is needed, so much confusion on this. I might have to do it

True also there are not enough studies showing real growth besodes rats, side effects are too dangerous like blood pressure weaker bone osteoporosis, heart attacks for example from ky,tyra, and all the other knows fgfr3 inhibs, also i think cap ingibs go into the same category also i belive that during development u cant significanrly change you growth outcome by using anthing outside of the body
Mirin
I may be wrong only done research on ky and tyra 300 maybe there are some in wich the side effects are kinda none i dont belive it though bc u dont know how your body will react to it
Grey cell coping = me
A lot can be countered. Idk if you know that KY is not a fgfr3 inhib.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 159945, N1kolai and ICL
looking forward to it
If people will like it enough I will make a very in depth thread on FGFR inhibition in general.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 159945, mrpein and ICL
Anything to do with ,,heightmaxxing" is just retarded and dangerous anyway
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: brootaldood, pslmapper, D02 and 3 others
A lot can be countered. Idk if you know that KY is not a fgfr3 inhib.
Oh mb
I mean still i did research on it so yea sorry bhai
 
  • +1
Reactions: ICL, Deleted member 159945 and Paul.jnxy
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: brootaldood, ICL, Deleted member 159945 and 1 other person
  • +1
Reactions: ICL, Deleted member 159945 and N1kolai
  • +1
Reactions: ICL, Deleted member 159945 and Paul.jnxy
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 159945, ICL and mrpein
Anything to do with ,,heightmaxxing" is just retarded and dangerous anyway
There's levels to this

FGFR3 underexpression likely deforms you and HGH likely gives you insulin resistance
If people will like it enough I will make a very in depth thread on FGFR inhibition in general.
Many people keep making FGFR3 threads, it's like a specific surge from today

And tag the guy above as wel
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 159945, Ahmed88 and Paul.jnxy
There's levels to this

FGFR3 underexpression likely deforms you and HGH likely gives you insulin resistance

Many people keep making FGFR3 threads, it's like a specific surge from today

And tag the guy above as wel
The Ahmed one? Insulin resistance can be avoided if you have an iq over 70. i will tag you nighas. Underexpression is more nuanced.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ICL and Deleted member 159945
good thread, there should always be pros and cons presented not just the positives (ive no idea wtf a fgfr3 inhibitor does but still)
 
  • +1
Reactions: ICL, Paul.jnxy and Deleted member 159945
The Ahmed one? Insulin resistance can be avoided if you have an iq over 70. i will tag you nighas. Underexpression is more nuanced.
Tag me too please :peepoWave::peepoWave:
 
  • +1
Reactions: ICL, Paul.jnxy and avgsub5human
good thread, there should always be pros and cons presented not just the positives (ive no idea wtf a fgfr3 inhibitor does but still)
seriously though, people think it's some magic like fgfr3 serves a purpose otherwise it wouldnt exist
 
  • +1
Reactions: avgsub5human and Paul.jnxy
seriously though, people think it's some magic like fgfr3 serves a purpose otherwise it wouldnt exist
No free lunch in biology boyo
 
  • +1
Reactions: ICL
The Ahmed one? Insulin resistance can be avoided if you have an iq over 70. i will tag you nighas. Underexpression is more nuanced.
With the people we've talked with, it's gonna be more than 70iq as certain mfs recommend up to 0.10mg/kg/day, clearly requiring insulin for this
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Paul.jnxy
I take GH+test and hope
 
  • So Sad
  • JFL
Reactions: ICL and Paul.jnxy
For height? It’s over :forcedsmile:
Well originally I was only taking GH and realised it was mainly cope so I added test so now my main goal is a body halo lmao
I love roshidere tho w pfp :ogre:
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Paul.jnxy and ICL
With the people we've talked with, it's gonna be more than 70iq as certain mfs recommend up to 0.10mg/kg/day, clearly requiring insulin for this
Perhaps not. Reta is a safer solution. Shall I explain why?
 
  • +1
Reactions: ICL

Similar threads

--ism
Replies
3
Views
54
rsj
rsj
pbr2088
Replies
11
Views
97
Niebvll
Niebvll
chigga6
Replies
14
Views
189
Certifiedlarp
Certifiedlarp
G
Replies
9
Views
185
greygreygrey123son
G
X
Replies
3
Views
47
xen.
X

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →