LXR
I ask you to judge me by the enemies I have made
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2025
- Posts
- 3,502
- Reputation
- 6,753
R9 is the better Ronaldo to me by eye test. One of the greatest strikers to ever grace this planet
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
JFL Van Basten was better than R9R9 is the better Ronaldo to me by eye test. One of the greatest strikers to ever grace this planet
All of them.Which years of cristiano did you watch to say some stupidity like this?
Comparing Van Basten to R9 is like comparing Emperor Augustus to a street hawkerJFL Van Basten was better than R9
If youve watched him while he was young youd know that is dumb statement and i can tell you haventAll of them.
Yes and Van basten is the former.Comparing Van Basten to R9 is like comparing Emperor Augustus to a street hawker
Ronaldo in his prime was the best 9 in the history of the sport.If youve watched him while he was young youd know that is dumb statement and i can tell you havent
Yes and Van basten is the latter
Yes true, but he doesnt have better eye test than cristianoRonaldo in his prime was the best 9 in the history of the sport.
yeah bro R9 also mogsR9 is the better Ronaldo to me by eye test. One of the greatest strikers to ever grace this planet
R9 competed in one of the best defensive eras in the most competitive league at the time. Serie A had 8 stacked teams all fighting for the title. That alone makes him greater. Ronaldo wouldnt even pass 25 if he played in that era. His knee would be broken into 10 piecesYes true, but he doesnt have better eye test than cristiano
Watch his dribbling/skills/passing from years 04/05 to 10/11
In terms of pure football yesR9 is the better Ronaldo to me by eye test. One of the greatest strikers to ever grace this planet
Ronaldo was playing in prime barclays prem and was facing worse tackles every weekR9 competed in one of the best defensive eras in the most competitive league at the time. Serie A had 8 stacked teams all fighting for the title. That alone makes him greater. Ronaldo wouldnt even pass 25 if he played in that era. His knee would be broken into 10 pieces
YesR9 is the better Ronaldo to me by eye test. One of the greatest strikers to ever grace this planet
R9 played in a world cup winning in 2002 after he suffered severe injuries. Even a reduced R9 was the best player in the world. He was the best in 2002 WCIn terms of pure football yes
R9 had more magic and skills to his game
Cr7 still dominates in records and goal scoring
R9 played in a world cup winning in 2002 after he suffered severe injuries. Even a reduced R9 was the best player in the world. He was the best in 2002 WC
Ronaldo was playing in prime barclays prem and was facing worse tackles every week
True but cristiano played against maldini and ac milan in 04/05 and was a pretty even battle. Maldini locked him up half the time and the other half cristiano was juggle running against him and got past him a few timesAnd it doesnt even compare to Serie A of 90s. None of those defenders are the caliber that were in Italy in that time. This is like comparing MJ era defense with 2000s defense