"Race" doesn't exist between Western Eurasians.

TheStonerOne

TheStonerOne

Bronze
Joined
Aug 1, 2025
Posts
297
Reputation
306
Even if "race" existed at all, it wouldn't be between Western Eurasians. A Lebanese person and an English person would be part of the "same race". Although Europe is characterised as being "relatively homogenous" this technically applies to all of Western Eurasia. There isn't much genetic distinction between Western Eurasians and the differences between a Saudi and Englishman are dwarfed by the differences between Northern and Southern Indians.

Besides, many Europeans are closer to Southern Caucasians or West Asians than to other Europeans and vice versa. Turks, Azeris, Armenians and Georgians are examples of ethnic groups who are considered 'Southern Caucasian", "European" and "West Asian" at the same time. A Sicilian is genetically closer to an Iraqi Kurd than he is to virtually any Northern European.

If "race" existed, it would be a European-Caucasian-Middle Eastern "race".
 
Not a single word
 
  • +1
Reactions: Debetro, fwhr glazer and vincentzygo
:forcedsmile::forcedsmile::forcedsmile: Race is genes not just how you feel
The genes of all Western Eurasians come from Western Eurasia so yes, they all would constitute "one race". It doesn't matter if the Western Eurasian is X percentage of Steppe or X percentage of Natufian or X percentage of Anatolian or Caucasian Hunter Gatherer or whatever Western Eurasian component. As long as the majority is associated with Western Eurasia, then that would be all that matters.

The "fine details" of specific ancestries only matter when comparing between regions.
 
bunch of gobbeldy gook
 
I'd say that whites and Arabs belong to the same subgroup of humans (Caucasians), but not the same race, as there is a noticeable difference in phenotype, skin-tone, culture, religion, language etc that gives Arabs their own racial identity
 
alr bro we get it
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top