Race Is a Social Construct, Scientists Argue

I'm not an alt righter. I am just a realist.

Where are you from? You seem out of touch with what you're talking about. I have been to Europe many times and have plenty of European friends, literally all of them identify as white.
Yes you are, and probably a flat earther aswell.
From Europe, nobody identifies as white here. It dosen't exist in out traditions. It's collonial thing, and yes, very much of a social construct.
 
Imagine thinking sub saharan Africans are the same as Europeans when Europeans have been geographically isolated from Africans for tens of thousands of years in a harsh northern climate and even bred with a different hominid (neanderthals).

You have to be painfully low IQ or willfully ignorant to believe that.

The same retard leftists will of course be the first ones praising the superiority of west african sprinters.
there were still people in europe with dark skin like 5,000 years ago, that's a blink of an eye jfl

if being "isolated" meant anything, which isn't the cause first because europe isn't isolated from africa at all, especially since the sahara is quite recent (like 6-4k years), and 2 europeans come from one the last migrations out of africa, we would expected abos to be the different ones since they left africa first, yet they superficially resemble africans

a lot of dog breeds are no older than 200-100 years, some even less than that yet they look very different, this is how fast you can potentially "change" one population's pheno, actual genetic diversitification that leads to subspeciation takes much more time, hundreds of thousands of years at very least (polar and grizzly bears for instance, have their last common ancestor "only" 500,000 years ago, relatively short period).
 
there were still people in europe with dark skin like 5,000 years ago, that's a blink of an eye jfl

if being "isolated" meant anything, which isn't the cause first because europe isn't isolated from africa at all, especially since the sahara is quite recent (like 6-4k years), and 2 europeans come from one the last migrations out of africa, we would expected abos to be the different ones since they left africa first, yet they superficially resemble africans

a lot of dog breeds are no older than 200-100 years, some even less than that yet they look very different, this is how fast you can potentially "change" one population's pheno, actual genetic diversitification that leads to subspeciation takes much more time, hundreds of thousands of years at very least (polar and grizzly bears for instance, have their last common ancestor "only" 500,000 years ago, relatively short period).
Lol at this cope

People spread into Europe 42,000 years ago and were certainly isolated from subsaharan africans for that entire time. They also bred with neanderthals.

To think evolving in a harsh northern latitude for over 40,000 years and breeding with a separate hominid didn’t produce a different race is pure retardation.
 
  • +1
Reactions: PubertyMaxxer, Deleted member 1507 and Deleted member 17430
If race is real, will someone explain to me are Anatolian Greeks "white" and anatolian Turks "non-white"?
Do Anatonial Greeks, or Cypriots, belong to the same race as Norwegians, and distant from the Turks?
If you can't explain this, then you can't really prove "race".
It's just as retarded as saying that since orange is neither yellow nor red, then colours don't exist
 
  • +1
Reactions: PubertyMaxxer
you just cant handle fact that romanians aren't as white as nordics, slavs or anglos. Cope
Romania is a whiter country than Swedistan in 2022.

Cope more. I know plenty of Romanians with blue eyes and brown hair.
 

Similar threads

emirtbp
Replies
16
Views
1K
htb_gooner
htb_gooner
Nodesbitch
Replies
30
Views
2K
aabb123
aabb123
Nodesbitch
Replies
28
Views
2K
Clav's Baseball Cup
C
omnis
Replies
98
Views
8K
omnis
omnis

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top