alurmo
In de underworld playing san andreas
- Joined
- May 5, 2024
- Posts
- 30,516
- Reputation
- 51,434
the only thing thats real is differing cultures
if we look at the origins of european ancestry, its likely a mix of western hunter gatherers, anatolian farmers and western steppe herders
a mix of cultures can create something beautiful, like the nords from a mix of hunter gatherer and early european farmer dna
and whatnot
race nationalism is retarded when ur base ancestry was never pure
and then people countering this is gonna pull up our instinct towards differenciation, which has been so morphed and warped in society, these people will think we had this innate instinct when dinosaurs were still around, which is obv wrong
the innate instinct that makes u distinguish people from ur culture to another is built on survivalistic drives, its origin was prob why some cultures lived in prehistorical ages, all u need is basic knowledge of how instincts develop and humans to know where this instinct prob comes from
my idea of this is that in prehistoric ages, when distuingishing tribes could save ur life, they bred this instinct into their kids, who naturally kept it for its survival nature,in ancient germania, tribes had similar physical appearances but at once were differenciated by how they dressed and styling of hair and superficial diferences
and then into the agricultural ages where the focus shifted to land ownership and this instinct shifted to being able to differenciate people from different areas, similar to the previous one, in ancient greece spartans/romans were differing from athenians due to their attitude towards life, in honesty, a spartan could prob integrate himself into athena and vice versa, but at once what differnciated u in this period was law, custom and ethos
now ultimately where the degeneration of this instinct comes from is the portugese in the 15th century, bc the people the portugese saw in guinea was likely so shocking to them, theyre perception of what was human changed, bc this instinct wasnt used to seeing such a drastic difference, i think since im mixed due to rapebabying happening during colonial ages, i can prob construct how natives wouldve seen the colonizers in the beginning, obv purely subjective but imagine seeing big ships coming towards u in the distance, that would be supernatural for native standards, and then also men dressed in otherwordly fabric carrying a sort of arrogance on ur soil, it would be perfect for deification, now, ive read enough of colinzer notebooks and diaries to assume that the natives humanized their pale brethrens over time, later accounts would prob see white people as materialistic strange merchants, when the foreigners start hoarding up ur lands resources claiming it has meaning when all ur life and ancestry knew was ritual and spiritual metaphysics, u would see them as insane, i mean thats how the mind works, and then their reliance on books and physical fraigility, i know this otherness was overwhelming for natives in the south africa region whos trad beliefs were based on nomadic ideas of land and community, when teh settlers moved inland
but away from that era, more modernly, the thoeries of race, the post colonial ideas and into the enligthenment ideas, humans were turned into animals metaphorically, just look at how tehy were classified into classes and categories by carl linnaeus, his works on non humans is fine for me but his mistake was putting humans into categories, how can u look at a person and not see a same specie simply adapted to another way, his categories was basically homo erectus x4 different continents, this is a blasphemous simplification of things
to think this scientific idea of carl was treated with the upmost respect is so stupid to me
since then these enlightenment ideas shouldve been abolished since modern biology evolved to know that humans innate qualities are same(not to say everything is the same or equal value in peoples btw)
obv religous ideas also united the peoples, the common idea of other peoples needing to work for the ones chosen by god and such, atleast the spanish didnt fully lean into slavery like the western europeans, who thank their stupidity and overindulgance in slavery, coming back for redemption, like poetry the lighter race is being replaced by the ones they ough to conquer
the modernistic man doesnt assosiate himself with local tribes and such anymore, its movements and ideologies, obv some of those involve race, its inevitible, but now its not a single germanic race or baltic race its the whole white race, which is really stupid considering some white races are fucking cucks
looking at modern europe, like i mentioned in the beginning, is from a diverse origin, thus the obsession they have with purity of blood like the national socialists of 20th century germany, is a phhysiological misunderstanding, but again its almos like they knew theyre backgrounds constituted of such a differing culture, my stance on nationalism is that its a fools ideology, this obsession for pure blood as if we are still in dangerous tribes living in the deserts and jungles, think a bit abt the future of humanity for a second
my opposition for this retarded ideology is a uber mixed society, i mean america is prob that along with some european states but they are dishonest with themselves or dont know where to channel their diversity and cultivate a greater society, but there comes the contradiction, they dug themselves that mess, and now have to dig themselves out
on the argument FOR mixed cultures, is bc of the possibility for a higher unity of culture, a one like the ancient greeks when the dorics mixed with orientals, i mean not every culture has the style of the greeks but that possibility for a greater culture alone makes me advocate for a mixed society
@Aox Ofwar @patrikos.psl
no tldr bc u people need to read!
idc abt the messiness of the thread, something i saw on here made me enraged enough to write this thread
if we look at the origins of european ancestry, its likely a mix of western hunter gatherers, anatolian farmers and western steppe herders
a mix of cultures can create something beautiful, like the nords from a mix of hunter gatherer and early european farmer dna
and whatnot
race nationalism is retarded when ur base ancestry was never pure
and then people countering this is gonna pull up our instinct towards differenciation, which has been so morphed and warped in society, these people will think we had this innate instinct when dinosaurs were still around, which is obv wrong
the innate instinct that makes u distinguish people from ur culture to another is built on survivalistic drives, its origin was prob why some cultures lived in prehistorical ages, all u need is basic knowledge of how instincts develop and humans to know where this instinct prob comes from
my idea of this is that in prehistoric ages, when distuingishing tribes could save ur life, they bred this instinct into their kids, who naturally kept it for its survival nature,in ancient germania, tribes had similar physical appearances but at once were differenciated by how they dressed and styling of hair and superficial diferences
and then into the agricultural ages where the focus shifted to land ownership and this instinct shifted to being able to differenciate people from different areas, similar to the previous one, in ancient greece spartans/romans were differing from athenians due to their attitude towards life, in honesty, a spartan could prob integrate himself into athena and vice versa, but at once what differnciated u in this period was law, custom and ethos
now ultimately where the degeneration of this instinct comes from is the portugese in the 15th century, bc the people the portugese saw in guinea was likely so shocking to them, theyre perception of what was human changed, bc this instinct wasnt used to seeing such a drastic difference, i think since im mixed due to rapebabying happening during colonial ages, i can prob construct how natives wouldve seen the colonizers in the beginning, obv purely subjective but imagine seeing big ships coming towards u in the distance, that would be supernatural for native standards, and then also men dressed in otherwordly fabric carrying a sort of arrogance on ur soil, it would be perfect for deification, now, ive read enough of colinzer notebooks and diaries to assume that the natives humanized their pale brethrens over time, later accounts would prob see white people as materialistic strange merchants, when the foreigners start hoarding up ur lands resources claiming it has meaning when all ur life and ancestry knew was ritual and spiritual metaphysics, u would see them as insane, i mean thats how the mind works, and then their reliance on books and physical fraigility, i know this otherness was overwhelming for natives in the south africa region whos trad beliefs were based on nomadic ideas of land and community, when teh settlers moved inland
but away from that era, more modernly, the thoeries of race, the post colonial ideas and into the enligthenment ideas, humans were turned into animals metaphorically, just look at how tehy were classified into classes and categories by carl linnaeus, his works on non humans is fine for me but his mistake was putting humans into categories, how can u look at a person and not see a same specie simply adapted to another way, his categories was basically homo erectus x4 different continents, this is a blasphemous simplification of things
to think this scientific idea of carl was treated with the upmost respect is so stupid to me
since then these enlightenment ideas shouldve been abolished since modern biology evolved to know that humans innate qualities are same(not to say everything is the same or equal value in peoples btw)
obv religous ideas also united the peoples, the common idea of other peoples needing to work for the ones chosen by god and such, atleast the spanish didnt fully lean into slavery like the western europeans, who thank their stupidity and overindulgance in slavery, coming back for redemption, like poetry the lighter race is being replaced by the ones they ough to conquer
the modernistic man doesnt assosiate himself with local tribes and such anymore, its movements and ideologies, obv some of those involve race, its inevitible, but now its not a single germanic race or baltic race its the whole white race, which is really stupid considering some white races are fucking cucks
looking at modern europe, like i mentioned in the beginning, is from a diverse origin, thus the obsession they have with purity of blood like the national socialists of 20th century germany, is a phhysiological misunderstanding, but again its almos like they knew theyre backgrounds constituted of such a differing culture, my stance on nationalism is that its a fools ideology, this obsession for pure blood as if we are still in dangerous tribes living in the deserts and jungles, think a bit abt the future of humanity for a second
my opposition for this retarded ideology is a uber mixed society, i mean america is prob that along with some european states but they are dishonest with themselves or dont know where to channel their diversity and cultivate a greater society, but there comes the contradiction, they dug themselves that mess, and now have to dig themselves out
on the argument FOR mixed cultures, is bc of the possibility for a higher unity of culture, a one like the ancient greeks when the dorics mixed with orientals, i mean not every culture has the style of the greeks but that possibility for a greater culture alone makes me advocate for a mixed society
@Aox Ofwar @patrikos.psl
no tldr bc u people need to read!
idc abt the messiness of the thread, something i saw on here made me enraged enough to write this thread
